›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 431-438.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.016

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑卸荷作用的底板突水破坏机制研究

张风达1, 2,申宝宏1, 3,康永华2   

  1. 1.中国矿业大学(北京) 资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083;2.天地科技股份有限公司 开采设计事业部,北京 100013; 3.中煤科工集团有限公司,北京 100013
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-17 出版日期:2016-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:张风达,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事承压水体上安全采煤方面研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项资助项目(No. 2011ZX05064);中煤科工集团青年创新基金(No. 2014QN005)。

Water inrush failure mechanism of mining floor under unloading effect

ZHANG Feng-da1, 2, SHEN Bao-hong1, 3, KANG Yong-hua2   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. Department of Coal Mining & Designing, Tiandi Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100013, China; 3. China Coal Technology & Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2014-11-17 Online:2016-02-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2011ZX05064) and the Youth Foundation of China Coal Technology & Engineering Group Co., Ltd., (2014QN005).

摘要: 在依据摩尔图解及断裂力学理论对底板卸荷突水破坏分析的基础上,运用损伤断裂力学并结合统一强度理论,建立了考虑渗透水压作用下分支裂纹端部形成的塑性区范围计算方程与岩体发生贯穿破坏时的损伤阀值。将裂纹扩展过程与岩体损伤耦合起来,确定了裂纹的损伤断裂能量计算公式并分析了其影响因素。结果表明:侧压系数 0.5时,最大主应力完全卸荷状态下裂纹端部应力强度因子比双轴应力状态下大,岩体易发生破坏。考虑了裂纹端部塑性区的影响,裂纹损伤断裂能量相比于不考虑其影响时偏大,增大了煤层底板突水的危险性。裂纹损伤断裂能量 与裂纹半长 、裂纹面连通面积与总面积之比 、裂纹面渗透水压 及最小主应力 呈正相关,与裂纹面摩擦系数 及岩体的弹性模量 呈负相关。分析结果为底板突水破坏机制研究提供了一定的参考依据。

关键词: 摩尔圆, 渗透水压, 应力强度因子, 统一强度理论, 损伤断裂

Abstract: To further understand the failure mechanism of water inrush from mining face floor, the water inrush failure mechanism of mining floor is analyzed using the Mohr diagram and fracture mechanics theory. By considering the effect of saturated pressure on the branching crack tip, an analytical formula for the plastic fractured region and a damage threshold of rock mass failure are established with damage fracture mechanics and the unified strength theory. An equation of damage fracture energy is determined by coupling crack propagation and rock damage, and the factors influencing the damage fracture energy are analyzed in depth. The results show that the stress intensity factor (SIF) of the crack tip at the complete unloading state of the maximum principal stress is higher than that at the biaxial stress state with a confining pressure coefficient 0.5, in which the mining floor has been found to be more prone to failure. By taking into account the influence of the plastic fractured region of the branching crack tip, it is noted that the crack damage fracture energy tends to be higher and water inrush risk of mining floor is more obvious. There is a positive correlation between and the crack half-length a, the ratio of crack connected area to the crack total area , crack seepage pressure and the minimum principal stress . Whereas it shows a negative correlation with the friction coefficient of crack surface and modulus of rock mass . The results provide some insights into the prediction of water inrush failure mechanism of mining floor.

Key words: Mohr circle, seepage pressure, stress intensity factor, unified strength theory, damage and fracture

中图分类号: 

  • TD 745

[1] 夏才初, 喻强锋, 钱 鑫, 桂 洋, 庄小清. 常法向刚度条件下岩石节理剪切−渗 流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 57-66.
[2] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[3] 杨石扣, 张继勋, 任旭华, . 基于改进数值流形法的接触裂纹问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2016-2021.
[4] 邵生俊, 陈 菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料 挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[5] 王登科, 孙刘涛, 魏建平, . 温度冲击下煤的微观结构变化与断裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 529-538.
[6] 杨石扣,任旭华,张继勋,. 基于数值流形法的重力坝水力劈裂研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3055-3060.
[7] 李 清,于 强,徐文龙,万明华,张 正,吕 陈,王汉军,. 应变片法确定Ⅰ型裂纹动态应力强度因子试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1211-1218.
[8] 罗先启,郑安兴,. 岩体裂隙模拟的扩展有限元法应用研究[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 728-734.
[9] 宋义敏, 邢同振, 吕祥锋, 赵泽鑫, 邓琳琳, . 不同加载速率Ⅰ型预制裂纹花岗岩断裂特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4369-4375.
[10] 杨石扣,任旭华,张继勋,. 改进的数值流形法在水力劈裂中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3875-3881.
[11] 杨仁树,苏 洪,龚 悦,陈 程,. 爆炸荷载下不对称Y型裂纹扩展规律的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2175-2181.
[12] 彭守建,谭 虎,许 江,刘义鑫, . 渗透水压作用下完整砂岩剪切-渗流耦合试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2213-2220.
[13] 李念斌,董世明,华 文. 裂纹面接触对中心裂纹圆盘应力强度因子影响分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2395-2401.
[14] 张 健,王新征,胡瑞林,. 无限倾斜填土非竖直墙背条件下地震主动土压力计算[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1069-1074.
[15] 曹雪叶,赵均海,张常光. 基于统一强度理论的冻结壁弹塑性应力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 769-774.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!