›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 554-562.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.029

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

沉积角对净砂宏微观力学特性影响的离散元分析

蒋明镜1, 2, 3,陈 添1,刘静德2, 3,付 昌2, 3,陈双林4,刘 鹏5   

  1. 1.河海大学 岩土工程系,江苏 南京210098;2.同济大学 土木工程防灾国家重点实验室,上海 200092; 3.同济大学 土木工程地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;5.杭州钱江经济开发区建设局,浙江 杭州 310000
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-16 出版日期:2016-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:蒋明镜,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事太空土、深海能源土、天然结构性黏土、砂土、非饱和土宏观微观试验、本构模型和数值分析研究以及土体渐进破坏分析方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No. 51025932);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51179128)。

Discrete element analysis of effects of sedimentary angle on macro-micromechanical properties of pure sand

JIANG Ming-jing1, 2, 3, CHEN Tian1, LIU Jing-de2, 3, FU Chang2, 3,   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 5. Construction Bureau of Hangzhou Qianjiang Economic Area, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, China
  • Received:2015-07-16 Online:2016-02-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars(51025932) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51179128).

摘要: 由颗粒定向排列导致的初始各向异性对净砂力学特性影响明显。为探究这一影响,首先采用自编的离散元软件生成4种不同沉积方向的椭圆颗粒净砂样,并分别对4种试样进行双轴压缩试验;其次,通过将离散元模拟结算与室内试验结果对比以验证该方法的可行性;最后,通过分析模拟结果研究沉积方向所产生的影响。结果表明:4种试样均出现应变软化及剪胀现象;随着沉积角? 的增加,试样具有由应变软化逐渐向应变硬化发展的趋势,试样的剪胀性逐渐减弱;在?=0°时试样取得最大峰值内摩擦角和最大残余内摩擦角,且随着? 的增大试样的峰值内摩擦角先降低然后基本不变,残余内摩擦角逐渐减小;颗粒排列初始优势方向基本与沉积方向平行,但随着轴向应变的增大,颗粒排列优势方向逐渐向平行于加载面方向旋转,接触点的优势方向由最初垂直于沉积方向逐渐向垂直于加载面方向旋转,且这两种旋转的改变幅度随着沉积角? 的增大而增大;而强接触力的优势方向始终垂直于试样的加载面。

关键词: 离散元方法, 椭圆颗粒, 各向异性, 净砂, 双轴压缩试验

Abstract: Initial anisotropy caused by granular arrangement effects the mechanical behaviors of pure sand evidently. In order to study such effects, pure sand specimens consisting of elliptical particles at four different sedimentary angles (?) are prepared by the self-developed software NS2D firstly, and then biaxial compression tests are conducted on those DEM specimens. Secondly, the simulated results are compared with those of laboratory tests to validate this method. Finally, the influence of ? is studied by analyzing the simulated results. The results show that all of these four specimens show strain softening and shear dilation phenomenon. With the increase of ?, the strain softening phenomenon of stress-strain curve tends to become strain hardening, and shear dilation phenomenon becomes more and more unapparent. The peak and residual internal friction angles achieve the maximum when ? =0°. With the increase of ?, the peak internal friction angle decreases and then keeps constant, while the residual internal friction angle decreases. The initial principal direction of particle arrangement is parallel to the sedimentary direction. With the increase of axial strain, the principal direction of particle arrangement rotates to the direction parallel to the loading plane gradually, and the principal direction of contact rotates from perpendicular to sedimentary direction to perpendicular to the loading plane. And the increments of both rotations aforementioned increase with the increase of ?. The principal direction of strong contact force is perpendicular to the loading plane all the time.

Key words: discrete element method, elliptical particle, anisotropy, pure sand, biaxial compression test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 43

[1] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[2] 洪陈杰, 黄曼, 夏才初, 罗战友, 杜时贵, . 岩体结构面各向异性变异系数的尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2098-2109.
[3] 徐东升, 黄明, 黄佛光, 陈成. 不同级配珊瑚砂水泥胶结体的破坏行为分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1531-1539.
[4] 徐杰, 周建, 罗凌晖, 余良贵, . 高岭-蒙脱混合黏土渗透各向异性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 469-476.
[5] 范运辉, 朱其志, 倪涛, 张坤, 张振南, . 基于弹性张量离散化的脆延转变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 181-188.
[6] 彭守建, 岳雨晴, 刘义鑫, 许江, . 不同成因结构面各向异性特征及其剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3291-3299.
[7] 尹晓萌, 晏鄂川, 王鲁男, 陈 利, . 各向异性片岩的微观组构信息定量 提取与断面形貌特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2617-2627.
[8] 加瑞, 雷华阳, . 有明黏土各向异性固结特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2231-2238.
[9] 付龙龙, 周顺华, 田志尧, 田哲侃, . 双轴压缩条件下颗粒材料中力链的演化[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2427-2434.
[10] 张坤勇, 臧振君, 李 威, 文德宝, Charkley Frederick Nai, . 土体三维卸荷弹塑性模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1313-1323.
[11] 张玉伟, 翁效林, 宋战平, 谢永利, . 考虑黄土结构性和各向异性的修正剑桥模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1030-1038.
[12] 柯志强, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 林志南, 吉 华, . 含横向节理的柱状节理岩体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 660-667.
[13] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 应宏伟, . 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4848-4856.
[14] 肖思友, 苏立君, 姜元俊, 李丞, 刘振宇, . 坡度对碎屑流冲击立式拦挡墙力学特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[15] 田雨, 姚仰平, 路德春, 杜修力, . 基于修正应力法的横观各向同性摩尔-库仑 准则及被动土压力公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3945-3950.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!