›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 647-654.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑体积应力效应的大理岩硬化软化力学模型

胡善超1, 2,周 辉2,谭云亮1,李 震3,杨凡杰2   

  1. 1. 山东科技大学 矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,山东 青岛 266590; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 3. 河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454000
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-05 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:胡善超,男,1984年生,在站博士后,主要从事矿山压力与岩层控制方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51274133,No.51474137,No.51374140, No.41172288,No.51279201)。

Hardening/softening mechanical model of marbles considering volumetric stress effect

HU Shan-chao1, 2, ZHOU Hui2, TAN Yun-liang1, LI Zhen2, YANG Fan-jie2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
  • Received:2015-08-05 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51274133,51474137,51374140, 41172288, 51279201).

摘要: 以锦屏二级水电站大理岩室内三轴压缩试验结果为基础,推导了考虑体积应力效应的塑性内变量公式,并研究了大理岩强度参数及剪胀特性随内变量的变化规律,结果表明,大理岩在峰前阶段凝聚力稍有降低,在峰后阶段迅速减小;内摩擦角随内变量增加而增大,并在内变量为0.8~0.9时达到最大值;不同围压下大理岩剪胀角均随内变量增大,且表现为先增大后减小的变化趋势,但低围压和高围压条件下剪胀角变化趋势不同。在此基础上建立了大理岩考虑体积应力效应的力学模型,并通过FLAC3D模拟了大理岩室内常规三轴压缩试验,模拟结果与室内试验结果吻合很好,表明该模型可较好地反映大理岩的主要力学特性。研究方法和成果可为其他深部脆性岩体的变形破坏分析提供重要的参考价值和借鉴意义。

关键词: 体积应力效应, 强度参数演化, 剪胀, 力学模型, 数值模拟

Abstract: Based on the results of compression test of marbles from Jinping Ⅱ hydropower station, an expression of plastic internal variable considering the volumetric stress effect is derived, and the evolutions of strength parameters and dilatancy with the internal variable are studied. The results show that: the cohesion of marbles decreases slightly in pre-peak stage while the cohesion decreases rapidly in post-peak stage; the internal friction angle increases with increasing internal variable and it reaches the maximum value when the internal variable reaches 0.8-0.9; the dilatancy angle increases firstly and then decreases with increasing the internal variable under different confining pressures, and the variations of dilatancy angle are different under low and high confining pressures. A mechanical model of marbles is established considering the effect of volumetric stress based on the above results, and the laboratory triaxial compression test is simulated with the established model using FLAC3D. The simulation results show a good agreement with the test results, indicating that the established model can reflect the main mechanical properties of marbles. The research methods and results will provide an important reference to the analysis of deformation and failure of other deep brittle rock masses.

Key words: volumetric stress effect, evolution of strength parameters, dilatancy, mechanical model, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45

[1] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[4] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[5] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[6] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[7] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[8] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[9] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[10] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[11] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[12] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[13] 丑亚玲, 黄守洋, 孙丽源, 王莉杰, 岳国栋, 曹伟, 盛煜, . 基于冻融作用的氯盐渍土−钢块界面力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 41-52.
[14] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[15] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!