›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 719-727.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.014

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和压实土率相关变形特征与时效模型

王智超1, 2, 3,金 刚1,吴晓峰2,邓旭华1,董 辉1   

  1. 1. 湘潭大学 岩土力学与工程安全湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411105;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 中南林业科技大学 工程流变学湖南省重点试验室,湖南 长沙 410004
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-03 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:王智超,男,1980年生,副教授,博士后,主要从事岩土流变学的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.51308485,No.51108397);湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(No.12JJ4006);湖南省重点试验室开放基金(No.14HNKLER01)。

Rate-dependent deformation characteristics and time-dependent constitutive model of unsaturated compacted clay

WANG Zhi-chao1, 2, 3, JIN Gang1, WU Xiao-feng2, DENG Xu-hua1, DONG Hui1   

  1. 1. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Engineering Safety, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Engineering Rheology, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China
  • Received:2015-04-03 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51308485, 51108397), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China (12JJ4006) and the Open Foundation of Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Engineering Rheology (14HNKLER01).

摘要: 为研究高填方路堤压实土率相关变形特征,对不同压实度的非饱和压实土分别开展了不同加载速率以及不同围压条件下的CD三轴剪切试验,探讨了不同工况下压实土的剪切强度指标;借助GDS饱和土静态三轴仪的围压控制器来间接测定非饱和压实土体变的途径。试验结果表明:压实土强度及变形特征具有明显的时间相依性,加载速率越大,压实土的抗剪强度越高,超固结变形特性越强,抗剪强度指标黏聚力c值增幅较大、内摩擦角 值增幅较小;低围压下,压实土呈应变软化及剪胀变形,且压实度越高,应变软化及剪胀变形越显著,c值增加明显、 值增加缓慢。采用基于下负荷面的弹黏塑性本构模型对路基压实土的率相关变形特征进行表征,预测结果与试验数据吻合良好,表明该模型适用于高填方路堤长期沉降分析。

关键词: 压实土, 率敏性, 超固结, 抗剪强度, 弹黏塑性, 本构模型

Abstract: To investigate the rate-dependent deformation characteristics of subgrade compacted clay of high-filled embankment, a series of CD triaxial shear tests on the unsaturated compacted clay with different compaction degrees is carried out under different loading rates and confining pressures, and the shear strength parameters under different working conditions are examined. A method is proposed for indirectly measuring the volume change of unsaturated compacted clay, i.e. using the confining pressure controller of GDS saturated static triaxial system to obtain the volume change. The experimental results show that the strength and deformation of compacted clay shows significant time-dependent characteristics. At the greater loading rate, the shear strength is higher and the over-consolidated properties are stronger, and the value of cohesion c increases more quickly but the value of the internal friction angle increases more slowly. Under low confining pressure, compacted clay shows dilatant and softening behavior. As the compacting degree increases, shear dilatancy and strain softening become more and more pronounced, shear strength index c increases quickly, whereas increases slowly. An elastic-viscoplastic constitutive model based on the subloading yield surface is adopted to describe the rate-dependent deformation characteristics of the over-consolidated compacted clay. The predictions of the proposed model are in good agreement with the experimental data, showing that the proposed model is suitable for analyzing the long-term settlement of high-filled embankment.

Key words: compacted clay, rate sensitivity, over-consolidation, shear strength, elastic-viscoplastic, constitutive model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.7

[1] 孟庆彬, 王杰, 韩立军, 孙稳, 乔卫国, 王刚, . 极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 19-29.
[2] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[4] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[5] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[6] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[8] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[9] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[10] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[11] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[12] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军, 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[13] 邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[14] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[15] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!