›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 793-801.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.023

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

加锚预制裂隙类岩体锚固机制试验研究及其数值模拟

王 平1, 2,冯 涛2, 3,朱永建2, 3,余伟健2, 3   

  1. 1. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083;2. 湖南科技大学 煤矿安全开采技术湖南省重点试验室,湖南 湘潭 411201; 3. 湖南科技大学 能源与安全工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-08 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 冯涛,男,1957年生,教授,博士生导师,主要从事复杂煤层开采、岩石力学和煤矿安全方面的研究工作。E-mail: tfeng@hnust.edu.cn E-mail: 674053967@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王平,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事深井开采理论与技术方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51374106);湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目(No.14A045);湖南省煤矿安全开采技术重点试验室开放基金(No.201404)。

Experimental study and numerical simulation of anchoring mechanism of anchored rocklike material with prefabricated fracture

WANG Ping1, 2, FENG Tao2, 3, ZHU Yong-jian2, 3, YU Wei-jian2, 3   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 2. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Safe Mining Techniques of Coal Mines, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 3. School of Energy and Safety Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China
  • Received:2015-04-08 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374106), the Key Project of Science Research of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (14A045) and the Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory Foundation of Safe Ming Techniques of Coal Mines (201404).

摘要: 为研究锚杆对裂隙岩体的锚固机制及其影响因素,对预制锚固单排裂隙试件进行单轴破断试验。提出了主控裂纹的概念,即控制试件强度弱化和最终破坏的一条或几条大裂纹称为主控裂纹。在不同的锚固条件下主控裂纹会有不同的产状:在有效锚固范围内,裂隙试件具有横向和纵向两类主控裂纹,而在无锚或有效锚固范围之外的试件仅有纵向一条主控裂纹贯通。通过声发射和应力监测表明,在有效锚固范围内锚杆能延迟主控裂纹产生和提高裂隙试件强度。另外,利用ANSYS软件对不同锚固条件下的裂隙尖端应力强度因子进行数值计算,得到了锚固距离和锚固倾角与裂隙尖端应力强度因子之间的关系;通过FLAC3D模拟了不同锚固距离下主控裂纹贯通模式,数值模拟与试验结果比较吻合。

关键词: 单组裂隙试件, 单轴破断试验, 数值模拟, 应力强度因子

Abstract: To investigate the anchoring mechanism and its influential factors of the bolt, a series of uniaxial breaking tests is conducted on the specimen with prefabricated fracture anchored with a single row bolt. A concept of the main-control crack (i.e., one or several large cracks controlling the strength weakening and the ultimate failure) is proposed. Under different conditions of anchorage, the main-control crack of specimen have different occurrences. In the effective anchoring zone, there are two types of main-control cracks observed in the fractured specimens, called the horizontal main-control crack and vertical main-control crack. It is found that specimens without rock bolt or with the cracks beyond the effective anchoring zone only have the vertical main-control crack. Acoustic emission and stress monitoring data show that the bolt can delay the initiation of the main-control cracks and improve the strength of the fractured specimens. Additionally, the stress intensity factors on the tip of cracks under different anchoring conditions are calculated using ANSYS software. Then the relationship among the anchoring spacing, anchoring angle and the stress intensity factor is obtained. The coalescence modes of main-control cracks are also simulated under different anchoring spacings by using FLAC3D software, and numerical results agree well with the experimental results.

Key words: single set of fracture specimen, uniaxial breaking test, numerical simulation, stress intensity factors

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[2] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[3] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[4] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[5] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[6] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[7] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[8] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[9] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[10] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[11] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[12] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[13] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[14] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[15] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!