›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 835-841.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.028

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于极限超载的无衬砌浅埋土质隧道稳定性研究

程小虎1,庞振勇1,曾东洋2,曾德光1   

  1. 1. 北京城建设计发展集团股份有限公司,北京 100037;2. 中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西 西安 710075
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-25 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:程小虎,男,1980年生,硕士,高级工程师,现从事隧道及地下工程的设计与研究工作

Theoretical research on whole stability of unlined shallow earth tunnels based on ultimate surcharge

CHENG Xiao-hu1, PANG Zhen-yong1, ZENG Dong-yang2, ZENG De-guang1   

  1. 1. Beijing Urban Construction Design & Development Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100037, China; 2. CCCC First Highway Consultants Co., Ltd., Xi’an, Shannxi 710075, China
  • Received:2014-06-25 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 为了从理论上判别和度量无衬砌浅埋土质隧道的稳定性,考虑拱形隧道洞身范围斜向滑裂面作用,采用极限平衡法导出隧道发生整体失稳时的极限超载与稳定安全系数理论解,并通过既有典型加载试验进行验证。浅埋隧道极限超载理论解与典型加载试验结果较接近,在此基础上,将抗滑力与滑动力之比定义为整体稳定安全系数,并分析其影响因素。研究表明,稳定安全系数随黏聚力、内摩擦角的增大而增大,黏聚力对其影响显著,而内摩擦角对其影响不显著;稳定安全系数随隧道跨度、覆跨比、超载的增大而减小,但超载越大对稳定安全系数影响越小;随着高跨比的增大,若黏聚力较低则安全系数减小,若黏聚力较高则安全系数先增大后减小。通过典型的加载试验对整体稳定安全系数进行了校验,表明稳定安全系数计算值基本满足工程允许误差要求。

关键词: 浅埋隧道, 整体稳定性, 极限超载, 安全系数

Abstract: To discriminate and measure the whole stability of unlined shallow earth tunnel in theory, considering the effect of oblique slip surface beside tunnel body, a theoretical solution of ultimate surcharge is deduced by adopting the limit equilibrium method during the occurrence of the tunnel overall instability, and then the solution is examined using the typical loading tests. It is found that the solution of ultimate surcharge formulation is close to the test results. On the basis, the ratio of sliding resistance to sliding force is defined as the whole stability safety factor, and its influencing aspects are analyzed. It is shown that the stability safety factor increases along with the increment of the cohesive force and the internal friction angle, and the effect of cohesive force on the safety factor is significant, but the effect of internal friction angle is less potent. The stability safety factor decreases with the increment of the span, the depth-span ratio, and the surcharge of earth tunnel, but the surcharge has less effect on the stability safety factor when it is larger. With the increment of the height-span ratio, the stability safety factor decreases as the cohesive force is low, but it increases firstly and then decreases as the cohesive force is high. Finally, the whole stability safety factor is verified by typical loading experiments, demonstrating that the calculation error is within the engineering allowance.

Key words: shallow tunnel, whole stability, ultimate surcharge, safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • U 451+.2

[1] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[2] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[3] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
[4] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[5] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[6] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[7] 汪大海, 贺少辉, 刘夏冰, 张嘉文, 姚文博. 地层渐进成拱对浅埋隧道上覆土压力影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2311-2322.
[8] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[9] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[10] 李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程 设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[11] 郭红仙, 周 鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[12] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[13] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[14] 肖国峰,陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[15] 许 明,唐亚锋,刘先珊,罗 斌,唐道勇,. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!