›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 883-892.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.03.034

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

全断面岩石掘进机滚刀最优刀间距计算公式研究

谭 青1, 3,易念恩1, 2,夏毅敏1, 2,朱 逸4,张旭辉1, 2,林赉贶1, 2   

  1. 1. 中南大学 高性能复杂制造国家重点试验室,湖南 长沙 410083;2. 中南大学 机电工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083; 3. 中南大学 轻合金研究院,湖南 长沙 410083;4. 湘潭大学 机械工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411105
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-23 出版日期:2016-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 易念恩,男,1976年生,博士研究生,主要从事机械故障诊断、盾构刀具、破岩机制方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: cocacor@sina.com E-mail:tanqing@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:谭青,男,1955年生,博士,教授、博士生导师,主要从事机械故障诊断、盾构刀具、破岩机制方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    973计划(No.2013CB035401);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51274252);863计划(No.2012AA041801)。

Study of calculation equation of TBM disc cutter optimal spacing

TAN Qing1, 3, YI Nian-en1, 2, XIA Yi-min1, 2, ZHU Yi4, ZHANG Xu-hui1, 2, LING Nai-kuang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Complex Manufacturing, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 2. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 3. Light Alloy Institute, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 4. School of Mechanical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China
  • Received:2015-01-23 Online:2016-03-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (2013CB035401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51274252) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA041801).

摘要: 基于剪切与张拉破岩机制,提出拉剪综合失效机制假设;建立了非协同切削与协同切削体积模型,推导了协同切削模式的滚刀比能耗理论模型;通过离散元仿真得到滚刀侵入岩石裂纹长度与贯入度的映射关系;推导出滚刀最优刀间距理论公式;以全断面岩石掘进机(TBM)回转切削试验台为基础,水泥模拟料为切削对象,通过多次压痕试验得到滚刀贯入度和岩石裂纹长度的趋势曲线,验证了仿真结果;通过滚刀滚动破岩进行了12组不同贯入度与刀间距的物理切削试验,统计滚刀做功与岩石破碎体积,拟合得到比能耗关系曲线,验证了最优刀间距理论公式的结论。研究表明:TBM滚刀最优刀间距计算公式综合考虑了岩石特性与滚刀结构特性,适应性较广泛;刀间距超过滚刀协同工作距离时,滚刀破岩以剪切破碎为主;刀间距小于2倍岩石裂纹长度时,张拉破碎的影响更加明显;随着贯入度的增加,最优刀间距逐渐增大,而最优滚刀间距S与贯入度P之比(S/P)值则逐渐减小。

关键词: TBM, 滚刀, 裂纹扩展, 比能耗, 最优刀间距, 颗粒离散元

Abstract: Based on tensile and shear failure mechanisms of rock breakage, a synthetic failure hypothesis has been proposed. With the establishment of the non-collaborative and collaborative cutting volume model, a theoretical model is deduced for the specific energy of tunnel boring machine (TBM) cutters working in the collaborative cutting mode. The relationship between the crack length and penetration is established by a discrete element model (DEM). A theoretical formula of optimal cutter spacing is then derived by the fitting method. Additionally, indentation experiments are conducted the cement simulation material as cutting objects using the TBM rotary cutting test platform. The relationship between the hob penetration and the crack length of the rock is obtained, and then the simulation results are verified by experimental results. The broken-rock volume is counted through 12 cutting experiments with different penetrations and spacings between cutters. Then the specific energy consumption fitting curve is obtained, which verifies the conclusion of optimal cutting spacing equation. The research results show that the characteristics of rock properties and the structure of the hob are comprehensively considered in the optimal cutter-spacing calculation formula of the full-face rock TBM, which potentially has wide applications. When the cutting spacing is greater than the collaborative spacing, the shear failure mechanism plays a dominant role in rock-breaking process. However, when the cutting spacing is less than the twice lateral crack length, the tensile failure mechanism has more significant effects on rock breakage. As the penetration increases, the optimal spacing increases while the optimal S/P decreases.

Key words: tunnel boring machine (TBM), disc cutter, crack propagation, specific energy consumption, optimal cutting spacing, particle discrete element

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45

[1] 薛亚东, 周杰, 赵丰, 李兴. 基于MatDEM的TBM滚刀破岩机理研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 337-346.
[2] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[3] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[4] 艾迪昊, 李成武, 赵越超, 李光耀, . 煤体静载破坏微震、电磁辐射及裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2043-2051.
[5] 吴鑫林, 张晓平, 刘泉声, 李伟伟, 黄继敏. TBM岩体可掘性预测及其分级研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1721-1729.
[6] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
[7] 张传庆, 刘振江, 张春生, 周辉, 高阳, 侯靖, . 隐晶质玄武岩破裂演化及破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2487-2496.
[8] 温森, 周书宇, 盛桂琳, . 复合岩层中滚刀旋转切割破岩效率试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2628-2636.
[9] 王海军, 郁舒阳, 任然, 汤雷, 李欣昀, 贾宇, . 基于3D-ILC含内裂纹孔口脆性固体断裂特性试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2200-2212.
[10] 杨石扣, 张继勋, 任旭华, . 基于改进数值流形法的接触裂纹问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2016-2021.
[11] 张 波, 李 垚, 杨学英, 朱飘扬, 朱春帝, 刘子豪, 刘文杰, 罗志恒, . 一种用于水压致裂试验的水压供给装置研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2022-2028.
[12] 丛 怡, 丛 宇, 张黎明, 贾乐鑫, 王在泉, . 大理岩加、卸荷破坏过程的三维颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1179-1186.
[13] 李铮, 郭德平, 周小平, 王允腾, . 模拟岩石中裂纹扩展连接的近场动力学方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4711-4721.
[14] 张珂, 王海军, 任然, 汤雷, 郁舒阳, 刘鑫娜, 顾浩, . 基于3D-ILC球体45º三维双内裂纹复合断裂研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4731-4739.
[15] 刘鹤, 刘泉声, 唐旭海, 罗慈友, 万文恺, 陈磊, 潘玉丛, . TBM护盾−围岩相互作用荷载识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4946-4954.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!