›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1061-1065.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.04.019

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Asaoka法预测软土地基沉降时存在的问题和对策

黄广军   

  1. 广东省深圳市龙华新区建设管理服务中心,广东 深圳 518102
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-15 出版日期:2016-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:黄广军,男,1969年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作

Problems and their solutions in predicting soft ground settlement based on Asaoka’s method

HUANG Guang-jun   

  1. Construction Management Service Center, Longhua New District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518102, China
  • Received:2015-05-15 Online:2016-04-11 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 采用Asaoka法对深圳某工程实例的地基工后沉降进行预测,发现选取不同的起始点和时间间隔时,其预测结果相差有3倍之多。因此,用数学方法对预测地基沉降的Asaoka法的表达式进行分析,探讨其拟合参数的误差对沉降预测结果的影响,提出了拟合参数误差放大系数的概念,并对预测结果的可靠性进行分析和评估。分析结果表明:影响Asaoka法沉降预测结果稳定性的一个主要原因是其预测沉降的表达式对拟合参数?1过于敏感,而且敏感性随着?1的增大而增大,因此,在保证线性拟合良好的前提下,增大离散点的时间间隔,可减小?1,从而有效减轻?1的误差对预测结果的影响;采用Asaoka法预测沉降时,不能单凭线性拟合的好坏来判断一个预测结果的可靠性,还需要考虑拟合参数的误差放大系数的大小。

关键词: 软土地基, 沉降预测, Asaoka法

Abstract: In applying Asaoka’s method to predict the post-construction settlement of a road foundation in Shenzhen, it was found that the predicted results can be different by three times, depending upon the chosen initial time and time spacing. In this paper, the mathematical formulation of Asaoka’s method is analyzed and the effect of the error of fitting parameters on the predicted results is discussed, from which the concept of the error amplification coefficient of fitting parameters is defined. The reliability of predicted results by Asaoka’s method is evaluated. The results show that one of the major reasons that affect the predicted results of Asaoka’s method is that the expression of settlement prediction is very sensitive to the fitting parameter ?1, and the sensitivity increases with the increase of ?1. Hence, without scarifying the accuracy of the linear fitting method, the time spacing is increased, and ?1 can be reduced, so that the influence of the fitting parameter error on the predicted results can be effectively reduced. In predicting the foundation settlement based on Asaoka’s method, the reliability of prediction is not only dependent upon the accuracy of linear fitting , but also on the error amplification coefficient of fitting parameters.

Key words: soft ground, settlement prediction, Asaoka method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 钟国强, 王 浩, 李 莉, 王成汤, 谢壁婷, . 基于SFLA-GRNN模型的基坑地表最大沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 792-798.
[2] 吴建涛, 叶 霄, 李国维, 蒋 超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[3] 汪益敏,闫 岑,于 恒,李 奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[4] 宗钟凌,鲁先龙,李青松,. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[5] 肖 忠,王 琰,王元战,刘 莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[6] 李洪江,童立元,刘松玉,顾明芬,陆湛秋,. 软土地基刚柔性桩水平承载位移控制标准研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2676-2682.
[7] 焉 振,王元战,. 考虑软基不排水强度循环弱化的格型钢板桩防波堤动力有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1454-1462.
[8] 曹文贵,印 鹏, 贺 敏,刘 涛. 基于数据新旧程度和预测取值区间调整的沉降组合预测方法[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 534-540.
[9] 肖 忠,葛博睿,王元战,王 琰, . 十字形内隔板对桶形基础各单向承载力和破坏模式的影响分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3136-3144.
[10] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[11] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[12] 周小文,陈凌伟,程展林,汪明元,. 软基路堤施工稳定性控制标准研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2631-2635.
[13] 朱 斌,冯凌云,柴能斌,郭小青, . 软土地基上海堤变形与失稳的离心模型试验与数值分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3317-3323.
[14] 蒋建清 ,曹国辉 ,刘热强,. 排水板和砂井联合堆载预压加固海相软土地基的工作性状的现场试验[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 551-558.
[15] 孙立强 ,张京京 ,李 恒 ,闫澍旺 ,霍知亮 , . 软土地基上影响预应力钢筒混凝土管相对转角关键因素研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 293-298.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!