›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1075-1082.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.04.021

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

开挖卸荷状态下深基坑变形特性研究

陈 昆1, 2,闫澍旺1,孙立强1,王亚雯2   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072;2. 天津大学 建筑设计研究院,天津 300073
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-29 出版日期:2016-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:陈昆,男,1974年生,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要从事混凝土工程与基坑工程方面的研究工作。

Analysis of deformation of deep foundation pit under excavation unloading condition

CHEN Kun1, 2,YAN Shu-wang1,SUN Li-qiang1,WANG Ya-wen2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Research Institute of Architectural Design & Urban Planning, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300073, China
  • Received:2015-04-29 Online:2016-04-11 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 深基坑开挖时因为卸荷作用会引起土体强度一定程度的降低,土体强度的降低会引起支护结构上土压力的变化,利用卸荷前土体强度指标进行土压力计算势必会小于实际情况,从而导致土体及支护结构变形计算值与实测值有一定的偏差。在深基坑开挖时,仅采用施工监测等手段进行事中控制是不够的,必须预先对变形值的发展规律做出模拟和预测。为探索深基坑开挖时,卸荷作用对基底土体和侧向土体强度特性和变形特性的影响规律,结合天津富力响锣湾大型基坑开挖,对开挖过程中土体基底回弹情况、支护结构以及周边土体的变形情况进行了全过程监测,利用试验结果数据计算出天津市富力响锣湾大型基坑开挖项目的卸荷强度参数,为后续数值模拟计算参数的选取提供了依据;利用ABAQUS有限元软件建立了三维数值模型,分别采用原状土的强度参数和卸荷参数对开挖过程中土体基底回弹、支护结构以及周边土体的变形情况进行了模拟,研究了两种情况下土体基底回弹、支护结构以及周边土体的变形规律,并将有限元模拟结果与监测结果进行了对比。研究发现,本工程土体卸荷后的扰动区在基底以下3~4 m范围,强度折减可达到20%~35%,根据卸荷比确定了周边土体强度折减为10%~15%;有限元模拟结果与实测值基本一致。通过分析可以看到,考虑基坑开挖卸荷作用是符合工程实际情况的,因此,建议在深基坑开挖设计时考虑土体的卸荷效应。该分析方法可为同类深基坑设计提供参考。

关键词: 深基坑开挖, 土体卸荷, 变形监测, 有限元, 对比分析

Abstract: The soil strength will decrease to a certain extent due to the unloading effect induced by deep foundation pit excavation. The decrease of soil strength will then change the lateral earth pressure exerted on the supporting structure system. So the actual lateral pressure will underestimated using soil strength parameters prior to unloading, which will result in a difference between the calculated deformation and the measured results of the supporting system. It is not sufficient to just monitor the deformation of support system during deep foundation pit excavation. In order to precisely predict the results, it is critical to understand the pattern of support system deformation under unloading effect. To investigate the influence of unloading effect on the soil strength and soil deformation on the bottom and sides of the excavated area, a case study is conducted on an excavation site of Xiangluowan Project of Fuli in Tianjin by monitoring the deformation of bottom rebound, supporting system and surrounding soil deformation during the entire excavation progress. Reduced soil strength of Xiangluowan project was calculated from measured results, which is used as the basic perimeters for the numerical simulation in later phase of research. ABAQUS, a commercial FEM software, is used to established a 3D model of the foundation pit excavation. By the model, the deformations of bottom rebound, supporting system and surrounding soil are simulated using in-situ soil strength and reduced soil strength as perimeters respectively. The deformation patterns of bottom rebound, supporting system and surrounding soil under two different conditions are studied; then the results from the finite element model analysis is compared with the actual in-situ monitored results. It is found that the disturbed zone imposed by unloading effect is located with 3-4 meter below the bottom of foundation, the percentage of strength reduction of the disturbed zone induced by unloading is up to 20%-35%, the percentage of strength reduction of the surrounding soil is 10%-15%, the results derived from FEM analysis is proved to be consistent with the field test results. It shows, through this paper, that it is practical and reasonable to consider the unloading effect during deep foundation pit excavation, thus the same method and philosophy is suggested to be applied in future deep foundation pit design and engineering.

Key words: deep foundation pit excavation, clay under unloading state, deformation monitoring, finite element, comparative analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 杨战标, 伯音, . 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[2] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[3] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[4] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[5] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[6] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[7] 叶观宝, 郑文强, 张 振, . 大面积填土场地中摩擦型桩负摩阻力分布特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[8] 赵密, 欧阳文龙, 黄景琦, 杜修力, 赵旭, . P波作用下跨断层隧道轴线地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3645-3655.
[9] 张海廷, 杨林青, 郭芳, . 基于SBFEM的层状地基埋置管道动力 响应求解与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2713-2722.
[10] 曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不 完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[11] 王翔南, 李全明, 于玉贞, 喻葭临, 吕禾, . 基于扩展有限元法对土体滑坡破坏过程的模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2435-2442.
[12] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[13] 吴顺川, 马 骏, 程 业, 成子桥, 李建宇, . 平台巴西圆盘研究综述及三维启裂点研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1239-1247.
[14] 梅慧浩, 冷伍明, 聂如松, 刘文劼, 伍晓伟, . 重载铁路路基面动应力峰值随机分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1603-1613.
[15] 邱 敏, 袁 青, 李长俊, 肖超超, . 基于孔穴扩张理论的黏土不排水抗剪强度 计算方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1059-1066.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!