›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1388-1398.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.022

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于蓄水期反演的锦屏一级拱坝极限承载力分析

程 立1,刘耀儒1,潘元炜2,杨 强1,周 钟3,薛利军3   

  1. 1.清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室,北京 100084;2.斯伦贝谢科技服务(北京)有限公司,北京 100015; 3.中国电建集团 成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610072
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-27 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘耀儒,男,1974年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学和水工结构方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:liuyaoru@tsinghua.edu.cn E-mail:l-cheng12@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:程立,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石力学、水工结构方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51479097,No. 11172150);水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室科研项目资助(No. 2016-KY-02)。

Research on ultimate bearing capacity of Jinping-I Arch Dam based on impoundment period inversion

CHENG Li1, LIU Yao-ru1, PAN Yuan-wei2, YANG Qiang1, ZHOU Zhong3, XUE Li-jun3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 2. Schlumberger Technologies (Beijing) Ltd., Beijing, 100015, China; 3. Power China Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China
  • Received:2015-11-27 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51479097,11172150) and Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering (2016-KY-02).

摘要: 锦屏一级拱坝坝高为305 m,是世界上最高的拱坝。但是,其坝基岩性较差,f5、f8等断层在建基面出露,基础严重不对称等地质复杂性给锦屏一级拱坝的极限承载力分析评价带来很多不确定性。基于变形加固理论,使用三维非线性有限元程序TFINE,采用直接法和正倒垂测点监测值反演蓄水期坝体混凝土弹性模量和基础变形模量,并验证反演参数在锦屏一级蓄水期预测和极限承载力分析中的适用性。使用反演参数,对坝体正常运行的应力、位移进行仿真分析;采用屈服区、不平衡力、塑性余能范数、整体稳定性安全系数等指标,基于工程类比法,全面评价锦屏一级拱坝的极限承载力。对比反演参数和设计参数的计算结果,验证了设计参数的可靠度。结果表明,锦屏一级拱坝起裂安全系数K1为2倍超载,极限承载安全系数K3为8倍超载,锦屏一级拱坝具有较高的极限承载力,整体稳定性是有保证的。

关键词: 锦屏一级, 极限承载力, 参数反演, 工程类比, 不平衡力

Abstract: It is known that Jinping-I arch dam is the highest arch dam in the world with a height of 305 m. However, the dam foundation lithology is quite poor due to f5, f8 and other faults exposed on the construction base layer. In addition, the foundation is highly asymmetric. Hence, the evaluation of the ultimate bearing capacity of Jinping-I arch dam cannot reach an agreement due to the geological complexity. Based on the deformation reinforcement theory and 3D nonlinear FEM program T-FINE, the concrete elastic modulus and dam foundation deformation modulus during impounding period are inverted using a direct method and values of the forward inverted plumb monitoring stations. Moreover, the validity and feasibility of the inversion parameters are verified in the impoundment period prediction and the ultimate bearing capacity analysis. The stress and displacement of dam body under normal conditions are simulated with the inversion parameters. Based on project analogy method, the ultimate bearing capacity of Jinping-I arch dam is evaluated completely, considering the yield zones, unbalanced force, plastic complementary energy norm, safety factors and other indexes. The reliability of design parameters is also verified by comparing the calculated results of inversion parameters and design parameters. The results show that K1 (the safety factor when crack initiating) of Jinping–I arch dam is double overload while K3 (the safety factor for ultimate load) is 8 times overload. Hence, it is confirmed that Jinping–I arch dam has a higher ultimate bearing capacity than other arch dams in 300 m height and thus the whole stability is guaranteed.

Key words: Jinping-I, ultimate bearing capacity, parameter inversion, project analogy, unbalanced force

中图分类号: 

  • TV223

[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 杨静熙, 黄书岭, 刘忠绪. 锦屏一级水电站工程岩体对穿声波与单孔声波 关联性探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1347-1356.
[3] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[4] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[5] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[6] 马春辉, 杨杰, 程琳, 李婷, 李雅琦, . 基于量子遗传算法与多输出混合核相关向量机的堆石坝材料参数自适应反演研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2397-2406.
[7] 王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[8] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[9] 董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 邬爱清, 陈胜宏, 周 钟, . 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征 及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.
[10] 宗钟凌,鲁先龙,李青松,. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[11] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[12] 曹文贵,谭建辉,胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[13] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[14] 李 泽,刘 毅,周 宇,王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[15] 孔纲强,彭怀风,朱 希,顾红伟,周立朵,. 水平荷载下纵截面异形桩承载特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 229-236.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!