›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1408-1416.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.024

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于施工监测和三维模拟的临危边坡锚固方案研究

李国维1, 2,顾忠卫3,贺冠军3,张俊标4,王 润5,胡龙生6   

  1. 1.河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京210098;2.河海大学 道路与铁道工程研究所,江苏 南京210098; 3.河海大学 岩土工程科学研究所,江苏 南京 210098;4.广东省高速公路有限公司,广东 广州510010; 5.中国冶金地质总局青岛地质勘查院,山东 青岛 266061;6.国家知识产权局专利局专利审查协作江苏中心,江苏 苏州 215000
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-31 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:李国维,男,1964年生,博士,研究员,主要从事软基路堤变形和高边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    广东省交通科技重点项目(2009-01-001);高校业务费专项(No. 2014B04914)

Anchorage scheme against imminent failure of slope based on on-site monitoring and 3D numerical modeling

LI Guo-wei1, 2, GU Zhong-wei3, HE Guan-jun3, ZHANG Jun-biao4, WANG Run5, HU Long-sheng6   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Highway and Railway Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 4. Guangdong Province Highway Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510010, China; 5. Qingdao Geologica Exploration institute of China Metallurgical Geology Bureau, Qingdao, Shangdong 266061, China; 6. Patent Examination Cooperation Jiangsu Center of Patent Office, SIPO, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, China
  • Received:2015-01-31 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Key Program for Communication Science and Technology of Guangdong Province and Special Funds for Universities(2014B04914).

摘要: 依据实际工程边坡案例,研究利用施工监测资料联合边坡稳定分析三维数值模拟确定临危边坡锚固方案的方法。研究表明,根据连续的监测资料可确定边坡内部剪切位移带的位置、发生区间和开始时间,据此可推测边坡潜在滑移面的位置和形状;边坡稳定分析有限元法三维模拟可以考虑坡体断面形态变化对坡体稳定和变形的影响,计算结果更具有合理性;以三维数值计算得到的坡体外部变形拟合实测变形和滑动面,依据临危边坡所处的极限平衡条件,可以确定坡体当前状态的等效力学参数;根据等效力学参数,通过三维模拟可以确定坡体最终形态下的潜在滑动面形状和位置,从而合理地确定加固锚索的长度和密度;工程运行情况表明,由此确定的加固方案是可靠的。

关键词: 高边坡, 滑移面, 变形, 数值模拟, 锚固

Abstract: In this paper, an anchorage scheme against the imminent failure of slope in practice has been proposed by considering on-site monitoring data and 3D numerical modeling. From the results, the position, time interval and initial time of internal shear slip plane are observed, according to the continuous monitoring data of the slope. Therefore, the position and shape of a potential slide plane can be predicted. Since the influence of the section morphology on slope stability and deformation is considered in this study, the results obtained by 3D numerical modeling are more reasonable. By fitting the external deformation and sliding surface with the numerical modeling and the measured data, the equivalent mechanical parameters of slope in any state are determined, according to the limit equilibrium condition of the imminent failure slope. From the equivalent mechanical parameters, the ultimate shape and position of the potential sliding surface are obtained by 3D simulation. The length and density of the reinforcement anchor cable can be further decided properly. The performance of this case study demonstrates that the proposed reinforcement scheme is reliable.

Key words: high slope, slip plane, deformation, numerical modeling, anchoring

中图分类号: 

  • TU 431

[1] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[2] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[3] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[4] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[5] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[6] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[7] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[8] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[9] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[10] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[11] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[12] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
[13] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[14] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[15] 王刚, 秦相杰, 江成浩, 张振宇. 温度作用下CT三维重建煤体微观 结构的渗流和变形模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1750-1760.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!