›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1521-1529.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.06.001

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

T应力对岩石裂纹扩展路径及起裂强度的影响研究

唐世斌1, 2,黄润秋2,唐春安1   

  1. 1. 大连理工大学 岩石破裂与失稳研究所,辽宁 大连 116024; 2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点试验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-02 出版日期:2016-06-13 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:唐世斌,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩石破裂过程分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No.2014CB047100);国家自然科学基金项目(No.51474046,No.U1562103);地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点试验室开放基金资助项目(No.SKLGP2014K017);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No. DUT14LK21)

Effect of T-stress on crack growth path in rock and fracture strength

TANG Shi-bin1, 2, HUANG Run-qiu2, TANG Chun-an1   

  1. 1. Institute for Rock Instability and Seismicity Research, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning 116024, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geo-hazards Prevention and Geo-environment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2014-09-02 Online:2016-06-13 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB047100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51474046, U1562103), the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (Chengdu University of Technology) (SKLGP2014K017) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT14LK21).

摘要: 经典断裂判据在分析岩石起裂角度及强度时,往往只选择裂尖应力场展开式中的r1/2奇异应力项,而将高阶的O(r1/2)项以及非奇异应力项(T应力)忽略,造成理论预测并不能完全吻合实际的试验结果。在充分考虑非奇异应力项对裂纹扩展影响作用的基础上,利用最大周向应力判据重新研究了岩石类材料脆性破坏的I、II及I-II复合型裂纹扩展。研究结果表明:(1)纯I型裂纹状态下,T应力为负时(压缩),裂纹的扩展是稳定的;而当T 应力为正时(拉伸),只有当 ,裂纹才沿着裂纹方向扩展(经典断裂判据所预测的方向),而其他情况下裂纹的扩展将发生偏转;(2)纯II型裂纹时,不仅沿着裂纹方向的T应力影响起裂角度及强度,垂直裂纹面上的N应力也同样具有重要的影响作用;(3)对I-II型裂纹而言,修正后的最大周向应力准则与试验结果吻合良好,且正的T应力增大开裂角,而负的T应力降低开裂角。通过控制T应力的大小,可以对裂纹扩展方向加以控制,从而使得裂纹扩展偏离最危险的方向,最大地限度阻止或延缓结构整体断裂的发生。

关键词: T应力, 裂尖奇异应力, 裂纹扩展, 断裂判据

Abstract: In the classical crack-tip stress field, the singular stresses (r1/2 term) near the crack tip are characterized by a single parameter, i.e. the stress intensity factor K. Therefore, the O(r1/2) term and the secondary non-singular term (T-stress) are always ignored. However, the stress and strain fields around the crack tip are influenced considerably by the T-stress. In this paper, the conventional fracture growth criteria, i.e. the maximum tangential stress criterion is modified to take into account the effect of T-stress, and is used to study the fracture growth when subjected to modes I, II or mixed mode (I/II) loading. The results show that: (1) In the pure mode I loading condition, if the T-stress is negative (compression), the crack growth is stable. However, if the T-stress is positive (tensile), the crack grows along the crack direction only when , otherwise, the crack growth direction will be changed. (2) In the pure mode II loading condition, the crack growth direction and the loading capacity are influenced not only by the stresses along the fracture direction (T-stress) but also by the normal stress on the fracture. (3) For the mixed loading condition, the T-stress consideration in the fracture criteria leads to better agree with the experiments. The positive T-stress results in an increase in crack growth angle, while the negative T-stress decreases that angle. The results reveal that it is benefit to control the T-stress to change the crack growth direction, in order to avoid the most dangerous crack growth direction or stopping/slowing down the overall structural fracture.

Key words: T-stress, singular stresses near crack tip, crack growth, fracture criterion

中图分类号: 

  • O 346.1

[1] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[2] 艾迪昊, 李成武, 赵越超, 李光耀, . 煤体静载破坏微震、电磁辐射及裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2043-2051.
[3] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
[4] 张传庆, 刘振江, 张春生, 周辉, 高阳, 侯靖, . 隐晶质玄武岩破裂演化及破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2487-2496.
[5] 王海军, 郁舒阳, 任然, 汤雷, 李欣昀, 贾宇, . 基于3D-ILC含内裂纹孔口脆性固体断裂特性试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2200-2212.
[6] 杨石扣, 张继勋, 任旭华, . 基于改进数值流形法的接触裂纹问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2016-2021.
[7] 张 波, 李 垚, 杨学英, 朱飘扬, 朱春帝, 刘子豪, 刘文杰, 罗志恒, . 一种用于水压致裂试验的水压供给装置研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2022-2028.
[8] 高青鹏, 曹 平, 王 飞, 王 柱. 压剪作用下多节理类岩试样力学性质及破坏判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1013-1022.
[9] 丛 怡, 丛 宇, 张黎明, 贾乐鑫, 王在泉, . 大理岩加、卸荷破坏过程的三维颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1179-1186.
[10] 李铮, 郭德平, 周小平, 王允腾, . 模拟岩石中裂纹扩展连接的近场动力学方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4711-4721.
[11] 张珂, 王海军, 任然, 汤雷, 郁舒阳, 刘鑫娜, 顾浩, . 基于3D-ILC球体45º三维双内裂纹复合断裂研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4731-4739.
[12] 马鹏飞, 李树忱, 周慧颖, 赵世森. 岩石材料裂纹扩展的改进近场动力学方法模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4111-4119.
[13] 王桂林, 梁再勇, 张 亮, 孙 帆, . Z型裂隙对砂岩强度和破裂行为影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 389-397.
[14] 伍天华, 周 喻, 王 莉, 孙金海, 赵 欢, 孙 铮, . 单轴压缩条件下岩石孔-隙相互作用机制细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 463-472.
[15] 杨石扣,张继勋,任旭华,. 基于数值流形法的三维裂纹扩展研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 488-494.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!