›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1665-1672.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.06.017

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

工业副产品木质素改良路基粉土的微观机制研究

张 涛1, 2,蔡国军1, 2,刘松玉1, 2,李军海3,接道波3   

  1. 1. 东南大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210096;2. 东南大学 江苏省城市地下工程与环境安全重点实验室,江苏 南京 210096; 3. 江苏省交通规划设计院股份有限公司,江苏 南京 210005
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-09 出版日期:2016-06-13 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘松玉,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事现代原位测试与特殊地基处理等方面的研究。E-mail: liusy@seu.edu.cn E-mail: zhangtao_seu@163.com
  • 作者简介:张涛,男,1986年生,博士研究生,主要从事新型土体改良剂和特殊地基处理等方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    江苏省杰出青年基金资助项目(No.BK20140027);中央高校基本科研业务费(No.2242016K41062);江苏省交通科学研究计划项目(No.2013Y04)。

Research on stabilization microcosmic mechanism of lignin based industrial by-product treated subgrade silt

ZHANG Tao1, 2, CAI Guo-jun1, 2, LIU Song-yu1, 2, LI Jun-hai3, JIE Dao-bo3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China; 2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering and Environmental Safety, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China; 3. Jiangsu Province Communications Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210005, China
  • Received:2014-10-09 Online:2016-06-13 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the the Foundation of Outstanding Youth of Jiangsu Province (BK20140027), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2242016K41062) and the Jiangsu Traffic Science Research Project (2013Y04).

摘要: 为揭示工业副产品木质素与土体间的相互作用机制,将木质素应用于路基粉土改良,通过对木质素及其改良土进行无侧限抗压强度、pH值、微观结构、化学元素、矿物成分和官能团等试验分析,研究不同掺量下木质素改良土的力学性能和pH值变化,对比分析改良前后粉土的微观结构变化,并基于化学分析结果探讨木质素的分子结构及与土体间的相互作用,提出木质素改良土体的机制。试验结果表明,改良土强度随木质素掺量增加而增加,掺量超过一定范围时,土体强度降低,木质素改良粉土的最优掺量为12%,且龄期对土体强度有着重要影响;强度与pH值基本呈线性相关关系;改良土微观结构更为致密、稳定,胶结物质将土颗粒相互联结,且未生成新的矿物;木质素通过水解、离子交换、质子化和静电引力等作用,导致双电层厚度减小,带正电荷的木质素高分子聚合物联结土颗粒并填充孔隙,改良土工程性质得以改善。提出的木质素改良土体机制可为工业副产品木质素的工程应用提供理论参考。

关键词: 工业副产品, 粉土, 微观结构, pH值, 官能团分析

Abstract: To reveal the stabilization mechanism of lignin based industrial by-product treated soil, the lignin is utilized to improve the silt of subgrade. The unconfined compressive strength, pH value, microstructure, chemical elements, mineral composition and functional groups of lignin and lignin treated silt are tested to evaluate the mechanical properties and pH values of silt after treatment. The difference of microstructure between silt and lignin treated silt is compared. The interactions between lignin and soil are also discussed based on the results of chemical analysis. A possible stabilization mechanism of lignin treated silt is proposed. The experimental results show that the unconfined compressive strength of lignin treated silt increases with the increase of lignin content, while the lignin content exceeds a certain range, the strength of soil exhibits a decreasing trend. The optimum percentage of lignin for silt is approximately 12% and curing time has an important influence on the strength of treated silt. The relationship between unconfined compressive strength and pH value of treated silt is approximately linear. Compared with natural silt, the microstructure of treated silt is more compact and stabler. Soil particles are bonded with cementing materials and no new clay minerals are formed after treatment. The engineering properties of silt are improved by the addition of lignin through hydrolysis, cation exchange, protonation and electrostatic reaction, which leads to the reduction of thickness for double-layer and filling the pore. The proposed model of microcosmic mechanism can provide a theoretical reference for engineering application of lignin based by-products.

Key words: industrial by-product, silt, microstructue, pH value, functional groups analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 449

[1] 赵怡晴, 吴常贵, 金爱兵, 孙浩, . 热处理砂岩微观结构及力学性质试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2233-2240.
[2] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[3] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 碱溶液预降解淤泥有机质的效果与机制讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1567-1572.
[4] 张升, 高峰, 陈琪磊, 盛岱超, . 砂-粉土混合料在列车荷载作用下 细颗粒迁移机制试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1591-1598.
[5] 孙银磊, 汤连生, 刘洁, . 非饱和土微观结构与粒间吸力的研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1095-1122.
[6] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[7] 张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, . 卢氏膨胀岩湿胀软化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 561-570.
[8] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[9] 韩钢, 周辉, 陈建林, 张传庆, 高阳, 宋桂红, 洪望兵, . 白鹤滩水电站层间错动带工程地质特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
[10] 尹黎阳, 唐朝生, 谢约翰, 吕超, 蒋宁俊, 施斌, . 微生物矿化作用改善岩土材料性能的影响因素[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2525-2546.
[11] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[12] 马文冠, 刘 润, 练继建, 郭绍曾. 粉土中筒型基础贯入阻力的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1307-1312.
[13] 江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王 浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[14] 王登科, 孙刘涛, 魏建平, . 温度冲击下煤的微观结构变化与断裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 529-538.
[15] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!