›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 1715-1720.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.06.023

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑龄期分层的固体废弃物填埋场边坡稳定分析

范鑫萍1, 2,黄茂松1, 2,王浩然1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 上海市城市建设设计研究总院,上海 200125
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-24 出版日期:2016-06-13 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 黄茂松,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: mshuang@tongji.edu.com E-mail:654289625@qq.com
  • 作者简介:范鑫萍,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(973计划)(No.2012CB719803)。

Stability analysis of a municipal solid waste slope layered by aging

FAN Xin-ping1, 2, HUANG Mao-song1, 2, WANG Hao-ran1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Shanghai Urban Construction Design & Research Institute, Shanghai 200125, China
  • Received:2014-11-24 Online:2016-06-13 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2012CB719803).

摘要: 固体废弃物填埋场长期使用过程中,垃圾土的强度参数随着龄期的变化而变化。在进行固体废弃物填埋场边坡稳定分析时考虑按龄期分层,基于极限分析上限理论,提出了转动-平动组合和多块体平动两种破坏机构。通过水平分层土坡算例的对比分析,验证两种破坏机构的合理性和有效性。进而对填埋场算例按龄期分层分析,结果表明,极限分析上限解的安全系数和破坏机制与强度折减有限单元法非常接近,多块体平动机构通过随机搜索所得的最危险滑裂面优于转动-平动组合机构。最后分析西班牙Coll Cardús固废填埋场,此填埋场是按龄期分层的典型复杂填埋场,运用两种破坏机构所得的安全系数和最危险滑裂面与有限单元法相符。算例分析表明,在不考虑水位的情况下,填埋体堆填时间越长越有利于填埋场的稳定。当填埋体按低、中、高龄期分层形成时,填埋场的整体稳定安全系数介于中龄期和高龄期的均质边坡之间。

关键词: 填埋场, 龄期, 稳定性, 转动-平动, 多块体, 数值模拟

Abstract: During the long-term service period of the municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill, the strength parameters of the waste body change as time elapses. In analyzing the stability of the MSW fill, we decompose the waste body into layers according to the age, and propose two failure mechanisms based on the upper bound theorem of limit analysis, including the rotational and translational mechanisms. To confirm the above two mechanisms, a comparative analysis is performed on a slope composed of horizontally soil layers, and then the case of the landfill slope layered by aging is analyzed by assuming the two mechanisms above. It is shown that the factor of safety and failure mechanism by the upper-limit solution of limit analysis are very close to those deduced from the reduction finite element analysis, and the critical failure mode obtained by the multi-block mechanism is more reasonable. In addition, the stability of the Coll Cardús MSW landfill in Spain with complex layers by aging is analyzed, and the results are consistent with those of the reduction finite element analysis. Our results indicate that, as the fill age increases, the landfill slope will become more and more stable in the absent of pore pressures. The fill age can be divided into low, middle and high levels. The safety factor of the landfill slope layered by aging is between those of the homogeneous slopes with middle to high aging levels.

Key words: landfill, age, stability, rotation-translation, multi-block, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • X 799

[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[5] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[6] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[7] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[8] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[9] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[10] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[11] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[12] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[13] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[14] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[15] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!