›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 42-48.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于层间位移协调的承压水降压引起土层变形分析

贾亚杰1,梁发云1,崔振东2,叶 华3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 中国矿业大学 力学与建筑工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116; 3. 上海宝冶集团有限公司,上海 200941
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-15 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 梁发云,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学与基础工程的教学科研工作。E-mail: fyliang@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:happyvsmorehappy@126.com
  • 作者简介:贾亚杰,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事基坑工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 50708078);上海宝冶集团有限公司资助项目(No. 20152094)。

Analysis of soil deformation caused by decompression of confined water based on displacement coordination condition

JIA Ya-jie1, LIANG Fa-yun1, CUI Zhen-dong2, YE Hua3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. Shanghai Baoye Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200941, China
  • Received:2015-12-15 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (50708078) and Shanghai Baoye Group Co., Ltd. (20152094).

摘要: 承压水降压引起的地面沉降由含水层、弱透水层和潜水层的变形组成。当承压层降压时间短、弱透水层固结变形较小时,可以假设弱透水层为严格的隔水层。采用层状弹性体系理论,基于位移协调条件分别建立了单井抽水以及第三类基坑工程降水(隔水帷幕插入降水含水层)引起的土层变形分析模型,与数值模拟和现场抽水试验结果的对比,验证了文中方法的正确性。研究结果表明,上覆土层弹性参数变化对地表变形的影响可以忽略;抽水井附近的土层变形呈现“上小下大”特点,一定距离以外含水层与地面沉降大致相等,根据承压含水层降深要求,可估算出基坑外的水位降深。

关键词: 承压水, 层状弹性体系, 变形协调, 土层变形, 降水

Abstract: Land subsidence caused by decompression of confined water is comprised of deformations of aquifer, aquitard and phreatic stratum. When the decompression features short duration so that consolidation deformation of aquitard is little, the aquitard is supposed to be watertight. Theory for elastic layered system is adopted to calculate layered soil deformation caused by dewatering of single well and the third type of foundation pit dewatering that the waterproof curtain inserts into the confined aquifer. The calculated results are compared with numerical simulation and in-suit tests results. The analytical results show that elastic modulus of the overlying soil has little influence on ground surface displacement; yet thickness of overlaying soil layer shall be taken into consideration. The settlement of soils overlying confined aquifer increases up to down nearby the pumping well. Over a certain distance, the settlement does not change with depth. The drawdown outside the foundation pit can be estimated according to the demand for drawdown inside the foundation pit.

Key words: confined aquifer, theory of elastic layered system, displacement coordination, soil deformation, dewatering

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 郑 刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈 达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.
[2] 马 凯,尹立明,陈军涛,陈 明,王自起,崔博强,. 深部开采底板隔水关键层受局部高承压水作用破坏理论分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3213-3222.
[3] 周 勇,朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.
[4] 曹文贵,谭建辉,胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[5] 胡 勇,李云安,李 波,李从安,肖捷夫,. 承压水位变动下深大基坑空间效应离心试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1999-2007.
[6] 李 伟,许 强,吴礼舟,李斯琦, . 平推式滑坡中底滑面承压水渗流形式对其稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1401-1410.
[7] 高 旭,郭建波,晏鄂川,. 考虑止水帷幕的深基坑降水预测解析计算[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1431-1439.
[8] 崔 凯,王东华,谌文武,任晓峰,刘 建,杨 光,. 基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 498-506.
[9] 姜文雨, 刘 一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[10] 陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
[11] 朱光丽,张文泉,张贵彬,王树立,. 采动诱发断层活化导水试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3163-3172.
[12] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[13] 曾超峰,薛秀丽,郑 刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[14] 杨光华 ,范 泽 ,姜 燕 ,张玉成 , . 刚性桩复合地基沉降计算的简化方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 76-84.
[15] 郑洪春 ,邓建辉 ,胡万雨 ,崔玉龙 ,周元辅,. 水库岸坡的承压水模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 869-876.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!