›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 49-56.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.006

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非稳定渗流条件下非饱和土质边坡稳定性的矢量和分析法研究

薛海斌1,党发宁1,尹小涛2,丁卫华1,刘海伟1   

  1. 1. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-15 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:薛海斌,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程数值仿真分析及优化设计。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技统筹创新工程重点实验室项目(No. 2014SZS15-Z01);水利部公益性行业科研专项基金(No. 201501034-04);云南省交通运输厅科技项目(云交科2014(A)01)。

A vector sum method for stability analysis unsaturated soil slope subjected to transient seepage

XUE Hai-bin1, DANG Fa-ning1, YIN Xiao-tao2, DING Wei-hua1, LIU Hai-wei1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering,Xi'an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2015-09-15 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Laboratory for Science and Technology Co-ordination & Innovation Projects of Shaanxi Province (2014SZS15-Z01), the Special Funds for Public Industry Research Projects of the Ministry of Water Resources(201501034-04) and the Science and Technology Projects of the Transportation Department of Yunnan Province(2014(A)01).

摘要: 研究可以同时考虑渗流、变形与稳定的非饱和土质边坡稳定性分析方法具有重要的理论意义及工程实用价值。基于Fredlund双应力变量理论进行非饱和非稳定渗流-应力耦合分析,同时与传统非耦合渗流方法确定的孔压场进行对比发现,两种方法确定的浸润线变化过程相近,堤底处孔压的最大相对误差为8.8%,验证了耦合分析结果的可靠性。将基质吸力对强度的贡献纳入黏聚力中得到坡体强度参数的空间分布规律,又基于滑面强度参数时空分布规律借助Matlab平台开发了非稳定渗流条件下非饱和土质边坡稳定性的矢量和法分析程序。以库水位下降条件下堤坡的稳定性分析为例,将不同方法的计算结果进行对比,发现文中方法搜索得到的滑面位置相对于传统方法要深缓,但总体位置相差不大,不同方法对应的安全系数相差不足0.096,验证了所提方法的合理性。

关键词: 非饱和非稳定渗流, 渗流-应力耦合分析, 非饱和土抗剪强度理论, 矢量和分析法, 边坡稳定性

Abstract: It has significant theoretical and practical meaning to propose a method of unsaturated soil slope stability analysis accounting for seepage, deformation and stability simultaneously. Firstly, coupled analysis of transient unsaturated seepage-stress is achieved using the double-stress variables theory of Fredlund. Comparative analysis with pore pressure field is done by the traditional uncoupled method. Variation process of phreatic lines are close to each other, and the maximum relative error of pore pressure is 8.8% at the bottom of embankment; thus the reliability of coupled analysis results are verified. Secondly, it is possible to consider the matric suction term as a part of the cohesion of the soil, and the spatial distribution law of strength parameters of the slope is obtained. Analyzing program of vector sum method of unsaturated soil slope stability analysis subjected to transient seepage based on Matlab has been developed. Finally, taking the influence of drawdown of reservoir water level on slopes stability of embankment for example, comparative analysis between traditional method and proposed method indicates that potential slip surfaces are similar and the difference of safety factors are less than 0.096; thus the rationality of the method proposed in this paper is verified.

Key words: transient unsaturated seepage, coupling seepage-stress analysis, shear strength theory of unsaturated soil, vector sum method, slope stability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[2] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[3] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[4] 夏侯云山, 张抒, 唐辉明, 刘晓, 吴琼, . 考虑参数空间变异结构的结构化交叉约束 随机场模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4935-4945.
[5] 唐洪祥, 韦文成. 耦合强度各向异性与应变软化的边坡稳定 有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4092-4100.
[6] 代仲海,胡再强,尹小涛,吴振君,. 工程荷载作用下缓倾角反倾似层状岩质边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
[7] 秦雨樵,汤 华,冯振洋,尹小涛,王东英, . 基于聚类分析的边坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2977-2983.
[8] 朱彦鹏,杨晓宇,马孝瑞,杨校辉,叶帅华, . 边坡稳定性分析双折减法的几个问题[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 331-338.
[9] 聂治豹,郑 宏,张 谭. 基于强度折减法确定边坡临界滑面的小波变换法[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1827-1831.
[10] 刘振平,杨 波,刘 建,贺怀建,. 基于GRASS GIS与TIN滑动面的边坡三维极限平衡方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 221-228.
[11] 蒋泽锋 ,朱大勇,. 强降雨条件下具有张裂缝边坡临界滑动场[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 25-34.
[12] 王 双,李小春,石 露,刘召胜,. 物质点强度折减法及其在边坡中的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2672-2678.
[13] 薛海斌 ,党发宁,尹小涛,雷 曼,杨 超,. 基于动力学和材料软化特性的边坡渐进破坏特征研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2238-2246.
[14] 高如超,李春光,孙 聪,郑 宏,葛修润,. 考虑张剪破坏的边坡下限原理有限元法[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2426-2432.
[15] 袁 维,胡叶江,李小春,白 冰,王 伟,陈祥军,籍晓蕾,. 一种基于位移场分析的临界滑动面确定方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1791-1798.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!