›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 133-139.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.017

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩土力学研究的一些反思

卢应发   

  1. 湖北工业大学 土木学院,湖北 武汉 430068
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-31 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:卢应发,男,1964年生,留法博士,教授,博士生导师,楚天学者,主要从事岩土力学及路基工程方面的教学和研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.41372363)。

Reflections on rock and soil mechanics research

LU Ying-fa   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China
  • Received:2015-07-31 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41372363).

摘要: 传统三轴试验径变形的测量多采用链式环状传感器,假设试件为对称破坏,呈X型或沿中心轴对称破坏为合理测量方式,绘制偏应力与体积应变曲线斜率没有意义,如果在三向等量加卸载下斜率具有含义。弹性阶段比例极限和峰值应力恒定,外加应力大于比例极限应力时比例极限和峰值应力随损伤变化。破坏区荷载与位移关系曲线是材料力学与结构综合体现,应将应力和应变改为视应力与视应变;传统的迟滞回线面积是能量耗散表征是不正确的,应是能量存储、转换和耗散表征;沿中心轴破坏应为拉破坏,能很好地解释岩体中拉裂纹现象,因此提出循环加卸载试验以卸载曲线线性段作为材料参数确定依据。对于孔隙连通材料,施加应力大于比例极限应力,在不排水任意应力状态水压力卸载至0,以卸载曲线的线性段决定相应材料参数,建议传统三轴试验改为50 mm×50 mm×100 mm六面体试件。在比例极限应力内,损伤变量恒定,在外加应力大于比例极限应力时,沿应力主轴各方向损伤演化不一致,且随应力路径变化。

关键词: 岩土试验, 破坏特征, 损伤特征, 特征应力空间, 迟滞回线特征

Abstract: The achievements of rock and soil mechanics research have been obtained until now. A zipper type transducer is used to measure the radial deformation of a cylindrical sample of traditional triaxial test, in fact; it is assumed that the failure type of testing sample is symmetrical; it is reasonable for the failure to occur by “X” type or along the symmetrical axis of sample. The physical significance of the slope between the average stress (or deviatoric stress) and volume strain relationship doesn’t existed, but it is existed under the condition that an equivalent loading or unloading in the three directions is performed at the same time. Yield proportional limit stress and peak stress keep constant under elastic segment; when an applied stress is greater the yield proportional limited stress, the yield proportional limited stress and peak stress spaces are changed with the damage state; the load and displacement relationship is a comprehensive representation of mechanics and structure of material post-failure, the stress and strain must be changed to be defined as “quasi-stress and quasi-strain”. Traditionally, it isn’t reasonable for the areas of hysteresis to present the energy dissipation of rock and soil material under cyclic loading-unloading case; it is reasonable for the areas of hysteresis to behave the storage, conversion and dissipation of energy. Based on the mechanism analysis, a traction stress criterion must be suggested to describe the failure along the symmetrical axis of testing samples, that is rational to explain the fissure existence in the natural integrated rock mass. It is more reasonable for the material parameters to determine by the linear segment of unloading curve; a formula is suggested to classify the linear segment. When applied stress is greater than yield limit stress, a non-drainage test is performed for the porous interconnection material; the water pressure unloading is conducted to be near zero at a stress state; the material parameters can be obtained by means of linear segment of water pressure and strain curve. A hexahedron testing sample (50 mm×50 mm×100 mm) is suggested to take the place of cylinder. The damage variables keep constant within the yield proportional limited stress, when the applied stresses are greater the yield proportional limited stress, the damage evaluation is different in the different main stress directions, and is changed with stress paths.

Key words: rock and soil test, failure feature, damage characteristics, characteristics stress space, hysteresis curve properties

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 卞康, 陈彦安, 刘建, 崔德山, 李一冉, 梁文迪, 韩啸. 不同吸水时间下页岩卸荷破坏特征的 颗粒离散元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 355-367.
[2] 宋文成, 梁正召, . 承压水上开采倾斜底板破坏特征 与突水危险性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 624-634.
[3] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[4] 张传庆, 刘振江, 张春生, 周辉, 高阳, 侯靖, . 隐晶质玄武岩破裂演化及破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2487-2496.
[5] 王 岗, 潘一山, 肖晓春, . 单轴加载煤体破坏特征与电荷规律研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1823-1831.
[6] 秦庆词, 李克钢, 杨宝威, 王 庭, 张雪娅, 郭 文. 岩石全应力-应变过程关键特征点损伤特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 14-24.
[7] 黄琪嵩,程久龙, . 软硬互层岩体采场底板的应力分布及破坏特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 36-42.
[8] 宋磊博,江 权,李元辉,杨成祥,刘 畅,杨 冰,李邵军,. 软-硬自然节理的改进JRC-JCS剪切强度公式[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2789-2798.
[9] 苏承东,熊祖强,刘少伟,王 文. 煤样单轴压缩时滞性变形破坏的试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 665-671.
[10] 胡少华, 章 光, 张 淼 ,姜秀玲,陈益峰,. 热处理北山花岗岩变形特性试验与损伤力学分析[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3427-3436.
[11] 王 宇,常德龙,李建林,李春波,胡安龙. 复杂应力路径下饱水砂岩宏细观力学特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3105-3114.
[12] 周 辉 ,胡善超 ,卢景景 ,王竹春 ,张传庆 ,渠成堃 ,李 震,. 煤矿深井巷道掘进全过程围岩变形破坏原位测试[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3523-3530.
[13] 蔡静森 ,晏鄂川 ,王章琼 ,杨建国 ,唐睿旋,. 反倾层状岩质边坡悬臂梁极限平衡模型研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 15-28.
[14] 邓华锋 ,原先凡 ,李建林 ,胡亚运 ,周美玲 , . 软岩三轴加-卸载试验的破坏特征及抗压强度取值方法研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 959-964.
[15] 何 刘,吴 光,赵志明. 坡面形态对边坡动力变形破坏影响的模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 111-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!