›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 201-208.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.026

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

减围压平面应变压缩试验条件下丰浦砂中剪切带特性研究

庄 丽1,宫全美2   

  1. 1. 韩国建设技术研究院 岩土工程研究所,韩国 高阳 411712;2. 同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 201804
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-08 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:庄丽,女,1984年生,博士,主要从事于岩土材料的宏微观力学特性的试验和数值分析研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41472247)。

Shear band characteristics of Toyoura sand in plane strain compression with decreasing confining pressure

ZHUANG Li1, GONG Quan-mei2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, Goyang 411712, Korea; 2. Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
  • Received:2015-06-08 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472247).

摘要: 不同于常规土体单元试验中恒定围压的应力路径,进行了减围压(卸载)应力路径下丰浦砂的平面应变压缩试验,研究了初始围压和初始相对密度对砂土的剪切强度和剪切带特性的影响。结合二维数字图像(DIC)相关方法,分析剪切带的形成过程,对剪切带的厚度和倾角及其影响因素进行定量地分析。研究结果表明,剪切带形成于峰值剪切强度之前;对于密实丰浦砂试样,随着围压的增加,其剪切强度(最大有效主应力比)减小且峰值强度出现越晚,剪切带厚度减小而剪切带倾角变化不大;丰浦砂试样的相对密度越高,剪切强度越大且峰值强度出现越早,剪切带厚度越小而剪切带倾角越高。此外,基于峰值内摩擦角的Coulomb公式可以较好地预测平面应变试验条件下丰浦砂的最大剪切带倾角。

关键词: 砂土, 平面应变压缩, 应力路径, 数字图像相关, 剪切带

Abstract: Different from the typical stress path often used in triaxial or plane strain test, a stress path with decreasing confining pressure was applied to plane strain compression test on Toyoura sand. Influence of initial consolidation pressure and initial relative density of sand specimen was investigated. By using the 2D digital image correlation(DIC) method, shear band formation process was analyzed. Shear band thickness and inclination angle, as well as their influencing factors were analyzed quantitatively. Study results show that shear band in the Toyoura sand appeared before the peak shear strength. For dense Toyoura sand, with increasing confining pressure, shear strength(principal stress ratio) decreases and its peak value appears later; shear band thickness is smaller but shear band inclination angle change is not obvious. With increasing relative density, peak shear strength increases and appears at an earlier strain; shear band thickness becomes smaller while shear band inclination angle becomes higher. Moreover, the Coulomb’s equation based on the peak internal friction angle can relatively accurately predict the maximum shear band inclination angle of Toyoura sand under plane strain compression.

Key words: sand, plane strain compression, stress path, digital image correlation(DIC), shear band

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] 毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[3] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[4] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[5] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[6] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[7] 覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合 受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[8] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[9] 孔宪京, 宁凡伟, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 周晨光, . 应力路径和干湿状态对堆石料颗粒破碎的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[10] 付龙龙, 周顺华, 田志尧, 田哲侃, . 双轴压缩条件下颗粒材料中力链的演化[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2427-2434.
[11] 孙逸飞, 陈 成, . 无状态变量的状态依赖剪胀方程及其本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1813-1822.
[12] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[13] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[14] 魏 星, 张 昭, 王 刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[15] 张 勋, 黄茂松, 胡志平, . 砂土中单桩水平循环累积变形特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 933-941.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!