›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 281-288.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.037

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环加载下X形桩竖向承载特性模型试验研究

卢一为1, 2,丁选明3,刘汉龙1, 2, 3,孔纲强1, 2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-28 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:卢一为,男,1990年生,博士,主要从事软土力学和地基基础工程领域科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金高铁联合基金重点项目(No.U1134207);长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT1125);国家自然科学基金(No.51378177)。

Model test of vertical bearing characteristics of X-section pile under cyclic loading

LU Yi-wei1, 2, DING Xuan-ming3, LIU Han-long1, 2, 3 , KONG Gang-qiang1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering of Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
  • Received:2015-03-28 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Joint High Speed Railway Foundation of China (U1134207), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team (IRT1125) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378177).

摘要: 实际工程中桩基经常受到各种动荷载作用,如高铁路基中的加固桩长期承受列车行车时产生的循环动荷载作用,桩基在循环荷载作用下的承载特性研究对动荷载下的工程设计至关重要。X形桩是一种在传统圆形截面桩基础上发展而来的新型异性桩技术,其承载机制不同于传统圆形截面桩。为了深入研究X形桩在循环荷载作用下的动力特性和荷载与沉降规律,开展了砂土中X形桩竖向循环加载大比尺模型试验。试验结果表明,随着循环加载的进行,X形桩顶产生累计沉降,且循环荷载比越大,加载频率越高,桩顶沉降越快;循环加载初期,X形桩顶动刚度降低,桩身轴力响应增大,桩侧摩阻力发生弱化,之后逐渐趋于稳定,且桩身下半段侧摩阻力较大;在同等加载条件下X形桩与等截面圆形桩相比,承受动荷载能力较强,桩侧摩阻力较大,长期循环加载作用下产生的累计位移较小。研究结果可为X形桩在动荷载作用下的工程设计提供参考依据。

关键词: 大比尺模型试验, X形桩, 砂土, 竖向循环受荷加载, 承载特性

Abstract: In practical engineering, pile foundations are often subjected to dynamic loads. For example, piles under high-speed railway are subjected to cyclic loading induced by train movement. Studying on the dynamic bearing characteristics of pile foundations under cyclic loading is of great importance in engineering design. The X-section pile is a new type of technique improved based on the traditional circular section pile. Its load-bearing mechanism is different from traditional circular section piles. The objective of this paper is to make further study on the dynamic characteristics and load-settlement relation of the X-section pile under cyclic loading; and then large-scale model tests on the performance of the X-section pile subjected to axial cyclic loading in sand are conducted. The results show that cumulative settlement of X-section pile is induced by the cyclic loading; and the settlement increases with increasing amplitude and frequency of the cyclic loading. At the initial period, the dynamic stiffness of X-section pile decreases and the axial stress of the pile increases. Furthermore, the friction resistance at the pile side decreases. After the initial period, they tend to be stable. These indicate that the dynamic performance of the X-section pile is better than the circular section pile; moreover, the friction resistance of the X-section pile is larger, the cumulative settlement of the X-section pile under long-term cyclic loading is smaller. The study results may provide some guidelines for the engineering design of the X-section pile under dynamic loading.

Key words: large-scale model test, X-section pile, sand, axial cyclic loading, bearing characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[2] 杨济铭, 张小勇, 张福友, 曾超峰, 梅国雄, . 砂土中桩-土-承台协同作用下桩基 承载特性细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2271-2282.
[3] 毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[4] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[6] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[7] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[8] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[9] 覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合 受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[10] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[11] 江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[12] 孙逸飞, 陈 成, . 无状态变量的状态依赖剪胀方程及其本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1813-1822.
[13] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[14] 尹 锋, 周 航, 刘汉龙, 楚 剑, . 车辆载重与动荷载对X形桩桩-网复合地基动力 特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1324-1330.
[15] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!