›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 469-476.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.061

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基坑开挖对邻近铁路路基变形影响与控制

王培鑫1, 2,周顺华1, 2,狄宏规1, 2,李 雪1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 城市轨道与铁道工程系,上海 201804;2. 同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海 201804
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-05 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:王培鑫,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事基坑与盾构隧道方面的研究。

Impacts of foundation pit excavation on adjacent railway subgrade and control

WANG Pei-xin1, 2, ZHOU Shun-hua1, 2, DI Hong-gui1, 2, LI Xue1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Urban Rail Transit and Railway Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
  • Received:2015-12-05 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 以某紧邻既有铁路线的基坑工程为依托,基于现场实测数据,分析了路基与基坑的变形规律、沉降原因和控制措施。结果表明,受列车荷载与渗漏水影响,路基沉降在坑底旋喷加固和施工冠梁、混凝土撑期间迅速增加,形成了长约50 m、最大沉降95 mm的沉降槽,60%以上的路基在该阶段的沉降增量占阶段累计沉降的70%以上,而地表沉降多小于20 mm,约为开挖深度的2.4‰;路基沉降槽处坑外横断面地表沉降呈“凹槽形”,在路基处沉降最大。在坡顶进行双液注浆能够控制地表与路基沉降,减少后续开挖施工对路基的影响,但注浆施工易导致边坡变形突变,尤其是向坑内的水平位移,不利于边坡稳定和铁路安全。

关键词: 基坑, 铁路路基, 边坡变形, 路基沉降, 双液注浆

Abstract: Deformation of subgrade and pit observed during construction of foundation pit engineering near a railway are presented. The deformation and control measures are analyzed. The settlement of surface ground and subgrade increase linearly over time during slope excavation, which is up to 12 mm after the slope excavation is completed. Affected by the train load and water leakage, the subgrade settlements increase rapidly during the construction of jet-grouting reinforcement of foundation pit bottom, top beam and concrete strut; and a nearly 50 meters long settlement tank with maximum settlement 95 mm is observed. It is also found that over 60% of subgrade subsidence increment during the construction of aforementioned stages accounts for more than 70% of cumulative settlement. Most of the surface settlement is less than 20 mm, 2.4‰ of excavation depth. The shape of the ground surface settlement profile within the region of subgrade settlement tank is concave type and the maximum settlement occurs at the subgrade. Two fluid grouting at slope top can effectively control the surface and subgrade settlement and reduce the impacts of subsequent excavation on subgrade. But the grouting construction may cause displacement mutation of slope, especially the lateral displacement towards to the pit, which is harmful to slope stability and railway safety.

Key words: foundation pit, railway subgrade, slope deformation, subgrade settlement, two-fluid grouting

中图分类号: 

  • TU 471
[1] 徐日庆, 程康, 应宏伟, 林存刚, 梁荣柱, 冯苏阳, . 考虑埋深与剪切效应的基坑卸荷下卧 隧道的形变响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[2] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[3] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[4] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[5] 王成汤, 王浩, 覃卫民, 钟国强, 陈舞, . 基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[6] 王洪新, 沈旭凯. 考虑支撑作用的基坑抗隆起稳定安全系数计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1680-1689.
[7] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[8] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[9] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[10] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[11] 丁智, 张霄, 金杰克, 王立忠, . 基坑全过程开挖及邻近地铁隧道变形实测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 415-423.
[12] 申翃, 李晓, 雷美清, 徐文博, 余秀玲, . 剪力键支护体系的构想及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2574-2580.
[13] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[14] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[15] 刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及 邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!