›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S1): 609-615.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S1.080

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于贝叶斯方法的船坞双排钢板桩围堰整体稳定性可靠度分析

朱 艳1,顾倩燕1,江 杰1, 2,彭 铭3, 4,肖炳辉1   

  1. 1. 中船第九设计研究院工程有限公司,上海 200063;2. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;4. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-30 出版日期:2016-06-16 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 彭铭,男,1981年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地质灾害风险及可靠度研究。E-mail: pengming@tongji.edu.cn E-mail:zy_tmgc@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱艳,女,1986.1,硕士,工程师,主要从事水工、地下工程、BIM相关设计研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41402257);上海市浦江人才计划(No.14PJ1408200);上海市普陀区高层次人才科研创新项目(No. 2014-A-13)。

Reliability analysis for overall stability of large-span double-row steel sheet-piled dock cofferdam based on Bayesian method

ZHU Yan1, GU Qian-yan1, JIANG Jie1, 2, PENG Ming3,4, XIAO Bin-hui1   

  1. 1. China Shipbuilding NDRI Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200063, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2015-01-30 Online:2016-06-16 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41402257),the Shanghai Pujiang Program (14PJ1408200), and the High-level Personnel Innovation Program of Shanghai Putuo District (2014-A-13).

摘要: 双排钢板桩围堰的整体稳定性具有较大的不确定性,同样安全系数情况下对应的失稳概率可能不同。为了更准确地分析双排钢板桩围堰的整体稳定性,降低稳定性分析中的不确定性,采用贝叶斯方法对船坞双排钢板桩围堰的整体稳定性进行可靠度分析。首先通过统计数据获取土体参数的先验分布,然后基于实测数据采用贝叶斯方法更新参数以得到后验分布,最后根据参数的后验分布采用一次二阶矩计算围堰结构的可靠度。贝叶斯方法从理论的角度解决了已有工程经验和实际案例数据两方面信息有效综合的问题,能在更接近实际情况的前提下进行可靠度分析。

关键词: 贝叶斯方法, 双排钢板桩围堰, 整体稳定性, 船坞, 可靠度

Abstract: There are large uncertainties in the overall stability of supporting structure of large-span double-row sheet-piled cofferdam. The projects with the same values of factor of safety may have different failure probabilities. It is found in practice that some projects with large factor of safety failed and vice versa. In order to improve the evaluation and reduce the uncertainties of stability analysis, Bayesian method is applied for reliability analysis. First, the prior probabilities of soil parameters are obtained based on statistic data. Then, the posterior probabilities are achieved by updating the prior with measured data based on Bayesian method. Finally, the method of “first order second moment” is applied to conduct reliability analysis of the supporting structure stability of deep excavation. Bayesian method theoretically solves the problem of integrating the information from both experience and measurements. The reliability analysis with Bayesian method may be closer to real cases.

Key words: Bayesian method, double steel sheet-pile cofferdam, stability, dock, reliability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[2] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[3] 黄生根, 沈佳虹, 李 萌, . 钻孔灌注桩压浆后承载性能的可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1977-1982.
[4] 赵密, 张少华, 钟紫蓝, 侯本伟, 杜修力. 柱下独立基础稳健性设计与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4506-4514.
[5] 李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程 设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[6] 张文生, 罗 强, 蒋良潍, 李 昂, . 小样本岩土参数下考虑矩估计偏差的 土质边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 315-324.
[7] 郭红仙, 周 鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[8] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[9] 蒋水华,刘 贤,姚 池,杨建华,黄劲松,江先河,. 低概率水平岩质边坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2991-3000.
[10] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[11] 张小艳,张立翔,李 泽,. 基于塑性极限分析上限法理论的土质边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1840-1849.
[12] 范文亮,王余乐,魏奇科,杨朋超,李正良, . 岩土工程可靠度分析的改进四阶矩方法[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1463-1468.
[13] 陈旺旺,李典庆,唐小松,曹子君, . 抗剪强度参数概率分布的最大熵估计及边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1469-1478.
[14] 杨智勇,李典庆,曹子君,唐小松, . 基于广义子集模拟的土坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 957-966.
[15] 李术才,贺 鹏,李利平,张乾青,石少帅,徐 飞,刘洪亮. 隧道岩质围岩亚级分级可靠度分析方法及其工程应用[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 967-376.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!