›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 2443-2450.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.09.002

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑剪应力作用的刚性挡土墙主动土压力分析

刘忠玉1,陈 捷2,李东阳1   

  1. 1. 郑州大学 土木工程学院,河南 郑州450001;2. 河南财经政法大学 工程管理与房地产学院,河南 郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-08 出版日期:2016-09-12 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:刘忠玉,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学与基础工程方面的研究工作。

Calculation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall considering shear stress

LIU Zhong-yu1, CHEN Jie2, LI Dong-yang1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China; 2. School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhenzhou, Henan 450002, China
  • Received:2015-04-08 Online:2016-09-12 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 以墙后为无黏性填土的竖直刚性挡土墙作为研究对象,假定墙后土体中形成圆弧形土拱,考虑水平土层间的剪应力,修正了水平层分析法,从而得到平动模式下主动土压力分布、合力大小及其作用点位置的表达式。通过与模型试验结果和现有理论成果的对比分析,证明了修正方法的合理性。参数分析表明,水平土层间的平均剪应力受墙土摩擦角、填土内摩擦角等因素的影响,与主动土压力一样沿墙高为非线性分布。同时,考虑水平土层间剪应力作用得到的侧向主动土压力系数、主动土压力合力与不考虑剪应力作用的理论解答相同,但合力作用点位置高于库仑解,且低于不考虑剪应力作用的理论解答。

关键词: 土力学, 挡土墙, 土拱效应, 剪应力, 主动土压力, 水平层分析法

Abstract: A rigid retaining wall with a vertical back face backfilled with a cohesionless soil is analyzed. By assuming that the soil arch behind the retaining wall has a form of circle, the active earth pressure formulation of horizontally layered soil is modified with considering the shear stress between the soil layers; and a set of theoretical formulae are proposed for calculating the active earth pressure, the total earth pressure and its action point for the retaining wall under translation mode. In order to check their accuracy, the predictions by the proposed formulae are compared with the results of full-scale test and existing theories. The calculated results show that the mean shear stress between level soil layers is related to the wall-soil friction angle and the internal friction angle, and it is distributed nonlinearly along the wall height. The coefficient of lateral active earth pressure and the resultant of active earth pressure are both independent of the shear stress between level soil layers; while the position of action point of the resultant earth pressure by the proposed formulae considering the shear stress is higher than that of Coulomb’s solution, and lower than that of existing theories in which the shear stress is neglected.

Key words: soil mechanics, retaining wall, soil-arching effect, shear stress, active earth pressure, differential level layer method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[2] 刘克奇, 丁万涛, 陈瑞, 侯铭垒, . 盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[3] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[4] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土 渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[5] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[6] 刘忠玉, 夏洋洋, 张家超, 朱新牧. 考虑Hansbo渗流的饱和黏土 一维弹黏塑性固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 11-22.
[7] 孔亮, 刘文卓, 袁庆盟, 董彤, . 常剪应力路径下含气砂土的三轴试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[8] 言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固 界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[9] 陈建旭, 宋文武, . 平动模式下挡土墙非极限主动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2284-2292.
[10] 芮 瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈 成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙 主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[11] 陈 峥, 何 平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[12] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[13] 张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王 南, 樊 孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体(CGN+C)界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[14] 王丽琴, 邵生俊, 王 帅, 赵 聪, 石鹏鑫, 周 彪, . 原状黄土的压缩曲线特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1076-1084.
[15] 刘 洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状 与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!