›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9): 2672-2678.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.09.032

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

物质点强度折减法及其在边坡中的应用

王 双1,李小春1,石 露1,刘召胜2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中冶北方工程技术有限公司,辽宁 大连 116622
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-09 出版日期:2016-09-12 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:王双,男,1985年生,博士研究生,主要从事无网格粒子法、非饱和土渗流及粗粒料研究工作。

Material point strength reduction method and its application to slope engineering

WANG Shuang1, LI Xiao-chun1, SHI Lu1, LIU Zhao-sheng2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Northern Engineering & Technology Corporation, Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd., Dalian, Liaoning 116622, China
  • Received:2014-10-09 Online:2016-09-12 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 物质点法适用于模拟连续介质大变形,如边坡失稳全过程。在物质点法中应用强度折减法,用于边坡稳定性评价。与极限平衡法相比,二者安全系数计算值、滑动面位置结果基本一致;与有限元强度折减法相比,物质点法失稳评价标准的物理意义明确。利用物质点法大变形计算优势,评价边坡失稳后的破坏后果,通过算例说明其评价不同安全系数下的滑坡堆积形态及滑移距离的能力,尤其是评价滑坡对临近建筑物的影响程度的能力。物质点强度折减法可用于边坡稳定性评价及边坡破坏后果评价。

关键词: 强度折减法, 物质点法, 边坡稳定性评价, 安全系数

Abstract: The material point method (MPM) is applicable to simulate large deformation of continuous medium, such as slope failure process. The strength reduction method (RSM) is applied to material point method for evaluating slope stability. In a slope stability evaluation example, the safety factor and slip surface position are got respectively by limit equilibrium method (LEM), finite element strength reduction method (FEM-RSM) and material point strength reduction method (MPM-RSM). Compared with LEM, the caculated results of safety factor value and slip surface position by MPM-RSM are basically the same with LEM and FEM-RSM. Compared with FEM-RSM, the physical meaning of MPM-RSM’s failure evaluation criterion is more clear. Taking advantage of its superiority in calculating large deformation, MPM-RSM can evaluate the consequences after slope failure. A case study shows its performance in evaluating debris shape and sliding distance for different safety factors, especially the advantage in estimating the impact degree of landslide on adjacent buildings. MPM can be used for the evaluation of slope stability and evaluation of slope failure consequence.

Key words: strength reduction method, material point method, slope stability evaluation, safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[2] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[3] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[4] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[5] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[6] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[7] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[8] 李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程 设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[9] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[10] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[11] 肖国峰,陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[12] 许 明,唐亚锋,刘先珊,罗 斌,唐道勇,. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[13] 李清川,李术才,王汉鹏,张红军,张 冰,张玉强,. 上覆流沙层隧道开挖面稳定性分析与数值试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2681-2690.
[14] 严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[15] 温树杰,梁 超,宋亮亮,刘 刚,. 基于最小势能法的三维临界滑裂面搜索方法[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2708-2714.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!