›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 43-52.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

古滑坡滑带土的力学特性与库水位变化对其稳定性影响及加固措施

张玉成1, 2, 3，杨光华1, 2, 3，张有祥4，钟志辉5，胡海英6   

  1. 1.广东省水利水电科学研究院，广东 广州 510610；2.广东省岩土工程技术研究中心，广东 广州 510610； 3.广东省山洪灾害突发事件应急技术研究中心，广东 广州 510610；4.北京市勘察设计研究院有限公司，北京 10038； 5.武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院，湖北 武汉 430072；6.华南农业大学 水利与土木工程学院，广东 广州 510642
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-12 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:张玉成，男，1975年生，博士后，教授级高工，从事岩土工程方面的咨询、设计研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No. 51378131）；广东省水利科技创新基金（No. 2009-25）；广东省公路管理局科技基金（No. 2012-09）；省属科研机构改革创新基金（No. 2014B070706008）。

Influence of mechanical properties of sliding zone and water level changes on ancient landslide stability and its reinforcement measures

ZHANG Yu-cheng1, 2, 3, YANG Guang-hua1, 2, 3, ZHANG You-xiang4, ZHONG ZHi-hui5, HU Hai-ying6   

  1. 1. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 2. The Geotechnical Engineering Technology Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 3. The Guangdong Emergency Technology Research Center of Mountain Torrents Disasters, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 4. Beijing Geotechnical Institute Engineering Consultation Limited, Beijing 100038, China; 5. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 6. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510642, China
  • Received:2016-06-12 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fund(51378131), Water Conservancy Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Guangdong Province(2009-25), Science and Technology Fund of Guangdong Provincial Highway Administration Bureau(2012-09), and Provincial Scientific Research Institutions Reform and Innovation Fund(2014B070706008).

PDF (Chinese)

890

摘要： 与普通滑坡体相比，库岸古滑坡体不仅影响稳定的因素多，且受库水位变化影响明显，极易诱发地质灾害，对人类生命财产安全造成危害。以某水库古滑坡体工程为例，利用现场直剪试验、室内直剪试验及标准贯入试验手段，研究滑带土的力学特性，并对利用得到的参数计算分析水位变化对古滑坡体稳定性影响的规律，得到鹅公带古滑坡体的安全系数随库水位升高成U形的变化规律。采用文献[12]提出的利用应力场判断滑坡体的类型，在高应力水平位置采取加固措施降低应力水平后边坡安全系数就提高的方法，由计算出的应力场判断鹅公带古滑坡具有上部推移下部牵引的特征，属于混合破坏型滑坡，针对其上部和下部坡体进行加固处理。对比分析不同加固方案对滑坡体应力场的改变和比较抗滑桩在不同位置时安全系数与位移场和应力场之间的关系，表明对高应力水平区和位移大的区域进行加固的效果最好，该滑坡体下部也是高应力水平区，由于现场施工条件，考虑经济性，最后采用在滑坡体下部设置反压体加固，加固后3年的实践表明利用边坡应力场的应力水平确定加固位置合理可行。文中的研究方法和思路可为类似工程处理提供一个很好地分析问题和解决问题的思路和同类工程借鉴。

关键词: 古滑坡, 变模量, 强度折减法, 水库边坡, 直剪试验

Abstract: Compared with the ordinary landslide, factors affecting the stability of the reservoir bank ancient landslide are much more. In addition to the regular factors, the stability is influenced by the water level change obviously. Moreover, the reservoir bank ancient landslide would become geological hazard easily, which causes great danger to human life and property. On the basis of an ancient landslide project of a reservoir, mechanical properties of sliding zone are investigated by the in-situ shear test, laboratory shear test and standard penetration test; and the regularity of influence of water level change on the ancient landslide stability is analyzed. The U-shaped changing regularity of safety factor of Egongdai landslide with water level is obtained. Methods presented in reference [12] are that landslide type can be identified by stress field, and then in high stress level sites reinforcement can be used to reduce stress level to increase safety factor. By the above methods, the upper region of Egongdai ancient landslide has thrust load-caused features; while the bottom region has retrogressive features. Therefore, the Egongdai landslide can be defined as combined landslide; and the upper and bottom regions should be reinforced. The influence on stress field of landslide by different reinforcement schemes are compared; and relationship between stress and displacement fields of the landslide and factor of safety of anti-sliding pile is studied. Results show that the optimal reinforcement site is the one of higher stress level and displacement. As for Egongdai landslide, the bottom region is also with high stress level. Considering the construction conditions and economy, an earth berm was finally constructed at the toe of Egongdai landslide 3 years ago. It is proved that determination of reinforcement site by stress level is reasonable. Research results can provide good reference to other similar projects.

Key words: old-landslide, variable modulus, strength reduction method, reservoir slopes, direct shear test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.7
[1] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[2] 柴 维, 龙志林, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, 闫超萍. 直剪剪切速率对钙质砂强度及变形特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.
[3] 李文轩, 卞士海, 李国英, 吴俊杰, . 粗粒料接触面模型及其在土石坝工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[4] 陈国庆, 唐 鹏, 李光明, 张广泽, 王 栋, . 岩桥直剪试验声发射频谱特征及主破裂前兆分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1649-1656.
[5] 周 辉, 程广坦, 朱 勇, 陈 珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[6] 秦昌安, 陈国庆, 郑海君, 唐 鹏. 端部岩桥直剪破坏试验及断裂条件[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 642-653.
[7] 崔国建，张传庆，刘立鹏，周 辉，程广坦,. 锚杆杆体–砂浆界面力学特性的剪切速率效应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 275-281.
[8] 魏匡民，陈生水，李国英，吴俊杰, . 陡峻河谷高面板坝坝体与坝基接触效应[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3415-3424.
[9] 高 樯，温 智，王大雁，牛富俊，谢艳丽，苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
[10] 陈 琛，冷伍明，杨 奇，金子豪，聂如松，邱 鋆,. 混凝土桩-泥皮-砂土接触面力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2461-2472.
[11] 赵 坤，陈卫忠，赵武胜，杨典森，宋万鹏，李 灿，马少森, . 地下工程衬砌与减震层接触面力学特性直剪试验及数值仿真[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2662-2670.
[12] 谢 涛，罗 强，张 良，连继峰，于曰明, . 主动与被动状态下墙体侧向位移近似计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1682-1690.
[13] 王永洪，张明义，刘俊伟，白晓宇, . 超孔隙水压力对低塑性黏性土桩土界面抗剪强度的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 831-838.
[14] 周 辉，程广坦，朱 勇，卢景景，陈 珺，崔国建，李振国，. 基于三维扫描和三维雕刻技术的岩石结构面原状重构方法及其力学特性[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 417-425.
[15] 胡贺松, 陈晓斌, 唐孟雄, 廖湘英, 肖源杰, . 随钻跟管桩桩-土接触面作用机制 大型直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4325-4334.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发