›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 129-136.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.015

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于弹性应变能的岩石强度准则

郭建强1,刘新荣2,王军保3,黄质宏1   

  1. 1. 贵州大学 土木工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550003;2. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045; 3. 西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-24 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:郭建强,男,1980年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩石力损伤、强度及地下结构的稳定性研究等方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省科学技术基金(No.黔科合J字[2015]2037号);贵州大学人才引进项目(No.贵大人基合字[2014]26号)。

Strength criterion of rock based on elastic strain energy

GUO Jian-qiang1, LIU Xin-rong2, WANG Jun-bao3, HUANG Zhi-hong1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3 College of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shannxi 710055, China
  • Received:2015-12-24 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Guizhou Province Science Fund Project ([2015]2037) and Guizhou University Talent Introduction ([2014]26).

摘要: 为建立更符合岩石屈服与破坏机制的强度准则,基于能量转化是岩石屈服与破坏的本质属性,采用试验与理论分析相结合的方法,对岩石屈服与破坏准则进行了研究。以岩石强度与整体破坏准则为基础,通过引入弹性应变能释放分散系数,建立基于弹性应变能强度准则;分别采用M-C准则、Murrell准则、三剪能量准则、统一能量准则、三维H-B强度准则及基于弹性应变能岩石强度准则对盐岩和花岗岩的破坏强度进行了计算。结果表明,基于弹性应变能岩石强度准则的计算结果与试验值比较吻合(尤其是真三轴试验条件下),并且分析了产生上述结果的内在机制。所建立的强度准则仅需测定常规岩石力学参数(单轴抗压强度与泊松比),物理力学意义明确,对于定量描述岩石的屈服与破坏特性具有重要的意义。

关键词: 弹性应变能, 强度准则, 分散系数

Abstract: On the basis of the relations between energy dissipation, energy release and global failure, with integrated experimental test and numerical simulation, a new strength criterion has been proposed for hard and soft rocks. By adopting the combination of experiment and theory analysis method, the rock yield and failure criteria are studied. The strength criterion of rock mass is build based on criteria strength and structural failure of rocks and the diffusion coefficient of elastic strain energy; The failure strength for rock salt and granite is calculated and with the following criteria respectively: Mohr-Coulomb criterion, Murrell criterion, triple shear energy yield criterion, unified energy yield criterion, Hoek-Brown criterion and yield and failure revised criterion. The results show that based on the elastic strain energy of rock strength criterion of the calculated result is more accurate and the error is more stable as well especially under true triaxial tests and the intrinsic mechanism of above-mentioned results is analyzed. The strength criterion has less parameters and has simple, so, it is significant for the accurate quantitative analysis of rock yield and failure characters.

Key words: elastic strain energy, strength criterion, diffusion coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 陈昊, 胡小荣. 非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[2] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[3] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[4] 尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘 超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.
[5] 王瑞, 闫帅, 柏建彪, 常治国, 宋远霸, . 端帮开采下煤柱破坏宽度计算及失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3167-3180.
[6] 汪 杰, 宋卫东, 谭玉叶, 付建新, 曹 帅, . 水平分层胶结充填体损伤本构模型及强度准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1731-1739.
[7] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[8] 吴顺川, 张敏, 张诗淮, 姜日华, . 修正Hoek-Brown准则的等效Mohr-Coulomb 强度参数确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4165-4177.
[9] 张玲, 陈金海, 赵明华. 考虑土拱效应的悬臂式抗滑桩最大桩间距确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[10] 田雨, 姚仰平, 路德春, 杜修力, . 基于修正应力法的横观各向同性摩尔-库仑 准则及被动土压力公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3945-3950.
[11] 吴顺川, 姜日华, 张诗淮, 张 敏, . 修正Hoek-Brown强度准则在钻孔稳定性 分析中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 1-13.
[12] 周兴涛,盛 谦,崔 臻,朱泽奇,胡之锋,马亚丽娜, . 基于C2阶连续函数的广义Hoek-Brown强度准则屈服面与塑性势面棱角圆化方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 477-487.
[13] 张 德,刘恩龙,刘星炎,宋丙堂, . 冻结粉土强度准则探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3237-3245.
[14] 陈四利,李艳宇,周 辉,胡大伟,. 基于极限应力比的三参数双τ2强度准则及其应用[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1948-1954.
[15] 姜光成,胡乃联,洪根意,李国清,方京珍,. 基于GSI值量化和修正方法的岩体力学参数确定[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2211-2218.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!