扩径率与入岩深度对岩基挖孔基础抗拔承载特性影响的试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.023

›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 195-202.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.023

扩径率与入岩深度对岩基挖孔基础抗拔承载特性影响的试验研究

崔强¹，孟宪乔²，杨少春³

1. 中国电力科学研究院，北京 102401；2. 中国能建集团安徽省电力设计院，安徽合肥 250013； 3. 安徽宏源电力建设投资有限公司，安徽合肥 250013

收稿日期:2016-01-07 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
作者简介:崔强，男，1980年生，博士，高级工程师，目前主要从事输电线路杆塔基础的科研和试验检测工作。
基金资助:
国家电网公司科技项目（No.GCB11201602063）。

Experimental investigation of influence of embedment depth and expanding ratio upon ultimate uplift resistance of hole digging foundation in rock

CUI Qiang¹, MENG Xian-qiao², YANG Shao-chun¹

1. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 102401, China; 2. Energy Engineering Group, Company Anhui Electric Power Design Institute, Hefei, Anhui 230601, China; 3. Anhui Hongyuan Power Construction Investment Co., Ltd., Hefei, Anhui 230601, China

Received:2016-01-07 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
Supported by:
This work was supported by the State Grid Corporation Science and Technology Project (GCB11201602063).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 扩径率和入岩深度是影响岩基挖孔基础抗拔承载特性的两个重要因素。通过开展8个不同扩径率、不同入岩深度挖孔基础的现场真型上拔静载试验，从荷载位移变化规律、抗拔承载力和地基岩体破坏模式三方面分析了扩径率与入岩深度对基础抗拔承载特性的影响，结果表明扩径率对荷载位移曲线初始线性阶段影响显著。采用图解法分别获得代表基础低、中、高3种承载能力的抗拔承载力QL1、QDLI、QL2，分析表明，随着扩径率与入岩深度的增加，基础抗拔承载力均有不同程度提高，但两种因素对基础承载力影响机制不同，扩径率可明显提高初始弹性阶段的承载力QL1，而入岩深度可明显提高塑性阶段的承载力QDLI和QL2。通过分析地基破坏时地表岩体裂缝的分布特征，得出岩基中上拔岩体的破坏模式与基础结构型式无关，均是从基底开始出现裂缝，沿着一定角度的开口延伸至地面，直至地基发生破坏，并且破坏范围随着入岩深度的增加而减小。综合考虑基础施工安全性、经济性和机械化程度，建议优先选择加深入岩深度的措施来提高基础抗拔承载力。

关键词: 扩径率, 入岩深度, 岩基挖孔基础, 抗拔承载力, 破坏模式。

Abstract: The expanding ratio and the embedment depth in rock are considered as the two most significant factors influencing the ultimate uplift resistance of the hole digging foundation in rock. In order to investigate the influence of the embedment depth in rock and the expanding ratio upon the ultimate uplift resistance of the hole digging foundation in rock, the uplift static load tests of full-size foundations in site are carried out to analyze the response of displacement verse load, the ultimate uplift resistance of the hole digging foundation and the failure mode of foundation rock mass with different expanding ratios and different embedment depths in rock. Results show that the expanding ratio has the significant impact on load-displacement curve in initial liner phase, Using graphic method, three different parameters QL1, QDLI, QL2 representing uplift bearing performance of low, medium and high respectively are achieved. Further analysis shows that the ultimate uplift resistance will increase with the increase of the expanding ratio and the depth of the rock respectively. But the difference of influence mechanism is found that the QL1 value representing lower uplift resistance in initial elasticity phase are affected obviously by the expanding ratio; and the QDLI, QL2 values representing medium and higher uplift resistance respectively in plasticity phase are affected significantly by the embedment depth in rock. Through the analysis of the distribution of surface cracks in the rock mass on ground damage characteristics, the following conclusions can be achieved. The failure mode of the rock mass upper foundation had nothing to do with the foundation structure style. Cracks are generated from the bottom edge of foundation at first, and then extended to the ground along opening with a predetermined angle until failure of foundation occurs. At the same time, destroy range decreases with the increase of the embedment depth in rock. Comprehensive considering construction safety, economy and mechanization degree, measures to increase the embedment depth in rock shall be preferred.

Key words: expanding ratio, embedment depth in rock, hole digging foundation in rock, ultimate uplift resistance, failure mode

中图分类号:

TU 452

崔强，孟宪乔，杨少春,. 扩径率与入岩深度对岩基挖孔基础抗拔承载特性影响的试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 195-202.

CUI Qiang, MENG Xian-qiao, YANG Shao-chun，. Experimental investigation of influence of embedment depth and expanding ratio upon ultimate uplift resistance of hole digging foundation in rock [J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 195-202.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[2]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[3]	周同和, 郜新军, 郭院成, 孙轶斌, . 下部扩大段复合桩抗拔承载力设计方法与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3778-3782.
[4]	熊晓荣，汤华，廖明进，尹小涛，王东英, . 隧道锚“楔形效应”的室内模型试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 181-190.
[5]	崔强，周亚辉，童瑞铭，吉晔. 上拔扩底基础与地基土体承载特性差异性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 476-482.
[6]	张昕，乐金朝，刘汉东,. 砂土中群锚锚周土体变形特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 240-248.
[7]	贺建清，肖兰，张文勇，高文华,. 基于改进的Mohr-Coulomb强度准则下岩石锚杆极限抗拔承载力计算[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2484-2488.
[8]	廖明进，王全才，袁从华，汤华，张水华，. 基于楔形效应的隧道锚抗拔承载能力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 185-192.
[9]	赵赟，张陈蓉，凌巧龙，黄茂松，胡玉银，. 软土地区注浆成型螺纹桩抗拔承载力的计算[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 334-340.
[10]	张琰，郑卫锋，朱照清. 用于砂岩加固的锚杆的承载性能试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 367-371.
[11]	白晓宇，张明义，刘鹤，寇海磊，. 风化岩地基全螺纹玻璃纤维增强聚合物抗浮锚杆承载特征现场试验[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2464-2472.
[12]	余生兵，黄茂松 . 基于块体集上限分析的锚板试验模型探讨[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 71-0076.
[13]	王浩. 扩底抗拔桩桩端阻力的群桩效应研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2203-2208.
[14]	钱建固，贾鹏，程明进，黄茂松. 注浆桩土接触面试验研究及后注浆抗拔桩承载特性数值分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 662-0668.
[15]	余生兵，黄茂松. 基于上限法的条形锚板抗拔承载力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 160-163.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

扩径率与入岩深度对岩基挖孔基础抗拔承载特性影响的试验研究

Experimental investigation of influence of embedment depth and expanding ratio upon ultimate uplift resistance of hole digging foundation in rock

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0