›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 287-293.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.035

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

花岗岩残积土填料路用工程特性室内试验研究

尹 松1, 2,孔令伟1,杨爱武3,穆 坤3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中原工学院 建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450007; 3. 天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室,天津 300381
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-22 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:ysong87@yahoo.com
  • 作者简介:尹松,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事特殊土力学及其工程特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41372314);中国科学院科技服务网络计划项目(No.KFJ-EW-STS-122)

Indoor experimental study of road performance of granite residual soil for subgrade filling materials

YIN Song1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, YANG Ai-wu3, MU Kun3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Characteristics and Engineering Environment of Tianjin, Tianjin Chenjian University, Tianjin 300381, China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41372314) and Service Network of Science and Technology Plan Projects, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-EW-STS-122).

摘要: 为了研究花岗岩残积土的路用工程特性,通过击实试验、承载比CBR试验、固结试验以及室内基床系数试验分析了该类材料压实性能及基本力学特性,对压实度为92%的最优含水率和饱和压实土样进行了循环加载试验,研究了动力荷载作用下土体的变形特性。结果表明,花岗岩残积土在K为91%~97%时压实功效率较高,提高压实度对于增强土体局部抗变形能力较为有效;采用室内三轴法得到的基床系数K30值为188.25 MPa/m;最优含水率下花岗岩残积土动力变形稳定性较好,但含水率增加会大幅度增加土体塑性变形,降低土的动弹性模量,不利于变形稳定。所以作为路堤填料,应考虑作为受气候与动荷载影响较小的下路堤备用填料,作为铁路路堤本体及公路上、下路路床填料,应在进行土性改良且满足要求的论证基础上取舍。研究成果可为花岗岩残积土填料的工程应用及土体改良提供技术参考。

关键词: 花岗岩残积土, 承载比试验(CBR), 基床系数, 含水率, 累积塑性应变, 动弹性模量

Abstract: In order to research the road performance of granite residual soil subgrade filling materials, compaction characteristics and mechanical properties of compacted residual soil are researched by using compaction test, California bearing ratio(CBR) test consolidation test and indoor test method for coefficient of subgrade reaction. The deformation properties of the soil under dynamic loads are studied by using cyclic loading test on the optimum moisture content and saturated samples. The results show that compaction works more efficiently with K of 91%-97% for granite residual soil. Improving the degree of compaction is effective to enhance the local deformation resistance of the soil. K30 was obtained from indoor triaxial test, and the value is 188.25 MPa/m. The dynamic stability of granite residual soil is comparatively well under the optimum moisture content. However the plastic deformation increases substantially and dynamic elastic modulus reduced with water content increasing. The increasing water content is not conducive to the deformation stability of the soil. So as filling materials, it shall be considered as spare materials of embankment which suffers low effect of environment. If used as subgrade body and highway roadbed, shall be modified and making choice based on the requirements of deformation. This study may provide technical reference for the construction process of granite residual soil as embankment filling and soil conditioning.

Key words: granite residual soil, California bearing ratio(CBR) test, subgrade coefficient K30, moisture content, cumulative plastic strain, dynamic elastic modulus

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 杨凯旋, 侯天顺. 击实试验类型对EPS颗粒轻量土击实特性的 影响规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1971-1982.
[2] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[3] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[4] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[5] 蔡雨, 徐林荣, 周德泉, 邓超, 冯晨曦, . 自平衡与传统静载试桩法模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3011-3018.
[6] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[7] 闫亚景, 闫永帅, 赵贵章, 张泰丽, 孙强, . 基于高密度电法的天然边坡水分运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2807-2814.
[8] 王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同胶结度断层泥强度参数与含水率关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1657-1662.
[9] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[10] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 李学彬, 张建俊, 任 昆, . 部分排水时饱和粉质黏土变围压循环三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1413-1419.
[11] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[12] 唐建新,腾俊洋,张 闯,刘 姝, . 层状含水页岩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 33-41.
[13] 陈瑞锋,田高源,米栋云,董晓强,. 赤泥改性黄土的基本工程性质研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 89-97.
[14] 郭林坪,孔令伟,徐 超,杨爱武,. 厦门花岗岩残积土物理力学指标关联性定量表征初探[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 175-180.
[15] 刘家顺,张向东,孙嘉宝,杨建军,方天健. 主应力轴旋转下K0固结饱和粉质黏土孔压及变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2787-2794.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!