›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 356-362.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.045

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土钉墙内部稳定性分析方法改进

周 勇1, 2,王正振1, 2   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730050; 2. 兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-30 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:周勇,男,1978年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事深基坑开挖支护和边坡加固方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51568042);教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划(No.2013IRT13068)

Improvement of internal stability analysis method of soil nailing wall

ZHOU Yong1, 2, WANG Zheng-zhen1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Ministry of Education Engineering Research Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Western China, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
  • Received:2016-04-30 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51568042) and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (2013IRT13068).

摘要: 现有土钉墙滑动面的确定方法大多假定圆弧滑动面通过坡脚,但事实并非如此。文中总结了实际中可能出现的圆弧滑动面的4种类型,利用圆弧滑动面圆心坐标与圆弧上3个位置参数的关系建立了不通过坡脚的土钉墙最危险滑动面的搜索方法。根据土钉墙滑动面的类型,讨论和完善了建筑基坑支护技术规程中土钉墙整体稳定安全系数计算公式。在3个算例中将不同方法得到的滑动面和整体稳定安全系数进行对比分析,结果表明文中方法得到的滑动面与其他方法结果接近,说明文中方法的可行性;部分情况下文中得到的滑动面不通过坡脚,而传统方法假定滑动面通过坡脚,二者计算偏差较大;对于除传统方法得到的滑动面之外的3种滑动面类型,在相同滑动面条件下完善后的公式由于考虑了部分土体重力沿滑动面切向的抗滑力作用,计算出的整体稳定安全系数稍大。

关键词: 稳定性分析, 坡体支护, 土钉墙, 安全系数, 滑动面

Abstract: Most methods to determine sliding surface of soil nailing wall are based on the assumption that all circular sliding surfaces pass the foot of slope; but the assumption is not always true. In this paper, four kinds of circular sliding surfaces that may appear in reality are summarized and an approach to search the most dangerous sliding surface that does not pass through the foot of slope is put forward using the relationship between the center coordinate and three location parameters of this circular sliding surface. In addition, the calculation formula for the factor of safety of soil nailing wall in Technical specification for retaining and protection of building foundation excavations is discussed and improved. Through comparing and analyzing sliding surfaces and the factors of safety obtained by different methods in three examples, the results show that sliding surfaces and the factors of safety got by the method established in this paper is quite close to those obtained by other methods, so as to verity the feasibility of the method established in this paper. In some cases, sliding surface got by the method established in this paper is very different from traditional method because of the assumption that the all circular sliding surfaces pass the foot of slope. The improved formula which takes the anti-sliding force produced by soil weight along the tangential direction of sliding surface into account can get a slightly greater safety factors under the same sliding surface for other three kinds of sliding surface except for the sliding surface got by traditional method.

Key words: stability analysis, slope supporting, soil nailing wall, safety factor, sliding surface

中图分类号: 

  • TU 753.8
[1] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[2] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[3] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[4] 聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[5] 陈建功, 李 会, 贺自勇, . 基于变分法的均质土坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2931-2937.
[6] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[7] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[8] 吴关叶, 郑惠峰, 徐建荣. 三维复杂块体系统边坡深层加固条件下稳定性及 破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2369-2378.
[9] 张龙飞, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 康田. 推移式缓倾浅层滑坡渐进破坏力学模型 与稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4767-4776.
[10] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[11] 李典庆, 周强, 曹子君, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的岩土工程 设计安全判据[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3977-3986.
[12] 刘锋涛, 张绍发, 戴北冰, 张澄博, 林凯荣, . 边坡稳定分析刚体有限元上限法的锥规划模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4084-4091.
[13] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[14] 尹小涛,严 飞,秦雨樵,周 磊,王东英, . 地震作用下华丽高速公路金沙江桥华坪岸顺层边坡动力稳定性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 387-394.
[15] 高 樯,温 智,王大雁,牛富俊,谢艳丽,苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!