›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 388-396.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.050

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

桩端后注浆对大直径灌注桩影响的现场对比试验研究

李永辉1,朱 翔1, 3,周同和2   

  1. 1. 郑州大学 土木工程学院,河南 郑州 450001;2. 郑州大学综合设计研究院有限公司,河南 郑州 450002; 3. 河南五建建设集团有限公司,河南 郑州 450000
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-26 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:李永辉,1983年生,男,博士,主要从事地基基础、桩基工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51508522);郑州市重大科技专项课题(No. 113PSHKS439)。

Experimental study of effects of pile tip post grouting on bearing characteristics of large-diameter bored pile

LI Yong-hui1, ZHU Xiang1,3, ZHOU Tong-he2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China; 2. Comprehensive Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002, China; 3. Henan Wujian Construction Group Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
  • Received:2016-07-26 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508522) and Major Science and Technology Project in Zhengzhou City (113PSHKS439).

摘要: 基于郑州三环快速路工程开展的6个场地19根大直径灌注桩现场足尺试验,通过对比分析后注浆桩与未注浆桩实测结果,研究桩端后注浆对大直径灌注桩承载变形性状、荷载传递规律、桩端承载特性及桩侧摩阻力发挥性状的影响。结果表明,桩端后注浆条件下大直径灌注桩承载变形性能明显提高,且提高幅度受注浆龄期影响较为显著;在黄河中下游以中密~密实粉土、粉细砂及可塑~硬塑粉质黏土为主要冲积地层中桩长40 m左右的大直径灌注桩表现为摩擦型桩,但相比于未注浆桩,桩端后注浆桩传递至桩身下部及桩端的荷载更小;桩端后注浆在桩端下形成水泥沉渣坚硬固结体,有效地处理了桩端沉渣问题,且通过渗透劈裂作用,形成深度可达1 m的网状分布的水泥胶结体,加之对桩端土层的压密效应,显著提高了桩端支承性能与承载刚度;桩端后注浆显著提高大直径灌注桩桩侧极限摩阻力发挥水平,并降低了桩侧极限摩阻力对应的桩土相对位移,使得大直径灌注桩在较小的沉降下表现出较高的承载能力。

关键词: 大直径灌注桩, 桩端后注浆, 现场试验, 承载特性, 桩土相对位移

Abstract: Based on 19 field pile load tests in 6 sites of Zhengzhou third ring rapid road engineering, pile bearing and deformation characteristics, load transfer laws, pile tip bearing capacities and pile friction behaviors of the pile tip grouted large-diameter bored pile are studied by comparing the field test results of the post grouted pile and pile without grouting. The results show that the bearing capacity of large-diameter bored pile is significantly improved under the condition of pile tip grouting. The influence of the capacity increasing amplitude is significantly influence by the grouting age. In alluvial deposits with soils mainly of medium dense to dense silt, fine sand and plastic to hard plastic silty clay in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, the large-diameter bored pile with a length of about 40 m shows characteristics of friction pile. However, the loads that are transferred to the lower part of the pile shaft and pile bottom of the pile tip grouted pile are smaller. Hard cement sediment concretion body be form under the pile tip by the pile tip post grouting, which is effectively deal with the problem of the sediment under the pile tip. Moreover, cement bond body with mesh distribution be also form in the soil with a depth of nearly 1 m under the pile tip through the fracturing and penetration effect of the post grouting. Coupled with the compaction effect of pile tip soil by the high pressure grouting, the bearing performances of the pile tip and the bearing stiffness are significantly improved; pile side friction ultimate resistances of the large-diameter bored pile is significantly improved by the pile tip post grouting. However, the pile-soil relative displacements which are correspond to the pile ultimate side friction resistances are reduced by the grouting. These are why the post grouted large-diameter bored pile shows higher bearing capacity in the small settlement.

Key words: large-diameter bored pile, pile tip post grouting, field test, bearing characteristic, pile-soil shear displacement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张晓磊, 冯世进, 李义成, 王雷, . 路基高架过渡段高铁运行引起的地表 振动现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 187-194.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 杨济铭, 张小勇, 张福友, 曾超峰, 梅国雄, . 砂土中桩-土-承台协同作用下桩基 承载特性细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2271-2282.
[5] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[6] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[7] 覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合 受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[8] 江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[9] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[10] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[11] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[12] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[13] 李 驰, 王 硕, 王燕星, 高 瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[14] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[15] 信亚雯, 周志芳, 马 筠, 李鸣威, 陈 朦, 汪 姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!