›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 597-606.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.075

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同类型滑坡渐进破坏过程与稳定性研究

谭福林,胡新丽,张玉明,何春灿,章 涵   

  1. 中国地质大学 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-26 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 胡新丽,女,1968年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程数值模拟与稳定性评价等方面的研究工作。E-mail: huxinli@cug.edu.cn E-mail:tanfulin868889@163.com
  • 作者简介:谭福林,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡稳定性分析方法及边坡防治研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41272305);国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目(No. 2011CB710604)。

Study of progressive failure processes and stabilities of different types of landslides

TAN Fu-lin, HU Xin-li, ZHANG Yu-ming, HE Chun-can, ZHANG Han   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2016-04-26 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272305) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2011CB710604).

摘要: 滑坡的类型一般可分为牵引式滑坡、推移式滑坡和复合式滑坡,根据其滑面的发展形态,依次表现为前进式渐进破坏模式、后退式渐进破坏模式和复合式渐进破坏模式。基于岩土体应变软化特性,揭示了滑坡渐进破坏过程的本质是滑带力学参数弱化的过程,初步探讨了3种类型滑坡渐进破坏过程的远动特点和力学特征和滑坡渐进演化过程。以不平衡推力法和3种类型滑坡的演化特征为基础,提出3种类型滑坡渐进破坏过程中临界状态条块确定方法,通过建立滑坡渐进破坏稳定性计算模型和计算公式,提出滑坡随着渐进演化过程的滑带参数取值方法,并阐述了渐进破坏过程的稳定性计算实现过程,实现不同类型滑坡渐进破坏过程的稳定性分析。以3个典型滑坡为例,分析得出滑坡渐进破坏过程中牵引式滑坡和复合式滑坡稳定性降低速率由大到小再到大和推移式滑坡稳定性降低速率由小到大的过程,3种类型滑坡在渐进破坏过程中不同部位对稳定性的贡献不同,验证了不同类型滑坡的变形规律。研究结论可对不同类型滑坡的稳定性发展进行初步预测和为滑坡治理提供指导意义。

关键词: 牵引式滑坡, 推移式滑坡, 复合式滑坡, 渐进破坏, 稳定性

Abstract: Deformation types of landslides generally include retrogressive landslide, load-caused landslide and complex landslide, which present regressive progressive failure mode, advancing progressive failure mode and composite progressive failure mode, respectively based on the development form of sliding zone. Based on the strain-softening behavior of sliding zone, the nature of progressive failure of landslide is weakening process of mechanical parameters of sliding zone which is revealed from the mechanical point. The movement and mechanical characteristics of three types of landslides in the process of progressive failure are determined preliminarily; and evolution process of different types of landslides are revealed. The distinguish criterion of sliding block of critical state is proposed based on the unbalanced thrust method and progressive evolution process. The calculation model and calculation formula of stability of progressive failure of landslides are established and the parameter value method of sliding zone is proposed, and the process to achieve stability calculation of the progressive failure is described. The method shows a complementary relationship in solving the stability problem of strain-softening landslides. Moreover, the progressive failure and stability variation for three typical examples of landslides are analyzed. The results show that the law of reducing speed of retrogressive landslide and complex landslide is from large to small to large; and the law of reducing speed of load-caused landslide is from small to large. In addition, the different part of landslide plays a different role on stability in the progressive failure process of three types of landslides; and the deformation regularity of different types of landslides is verified. The research results can predict the development of stability for different types of landslides preliminarily and provide guidance for landslide control.

Key words: retrogressive landslide, load-caused landslide, complex landslide, progressive failure, stability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[5] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[6] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[7] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[8] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[9] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[10] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[11] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[12] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[13] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[14] 姜谙男, 张权, 吴洪涛, 段龙梅, 焦明伟, 白涛, . 基于改进局部安全度的爆破作用边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[15] 聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!