›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3145-3155.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.014

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

稀疏不规则裂隙岩体模型三维水流-传热对温度和应力影响的试验研究

高俊义,项彦勇   

  1. 北京交通大学 土木建筑工程学院,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-22 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:高俊义,男,1984年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技支撑计划课题(No. 2013BAB10B06)。

A model test of effects of three-dimensional water flow and heat transfer on temperature and stress of sparsely irregularly fractured rocks

GAO Jun-yi, XIANG Yan-yong   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2016-01-22 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Infrastructure Program(2013BAB10B06).

摘要: 选取高放射核废物处置库重要预选场区甘肃北山地区的花岗岩,制作750 mm(宽)×300 mm(厚)×1 000 mm(高)的稀疏不规则裂隙岩体模型,该模型由18块花岗岩和竖向与斜向各两条裂隙组成,在裂隙及岩石内部埋置温度传感器、水压计、直角应变花,并在模型一侧设置局部热源,研究热源温度和裂隙水流速对岩石温度和应力的影响。结果表明,竖裂隙水主要从顶部进水口流向底部出水口,斜裂隙水主要从侧部进水口流向侧部出水口,竖裂隙与斜裂隙在交汇处存在微小流量交换;由于热源处在两条斜裂隙进水口之间,并且斜裂隙长度小于竖裂隙,岩石热传导与斜裂隙水流对岩石温度分布起控制作用,竖裂隙水流对岩石横向热传导起阻滞作用;由于热传导和水流传热的不规则性,上层岩石形成从左向右为主的传热路径,中层和下层岩石形成从上向下为主的传热路径;由于上、下层岩石温度梯度较小,岩石收缩受热拉应力,而中层岩石温度梯度较大,岩石膨胀受热压应力,大主应力的方向大致垂直于斜裂隙面与竖裂隙面的交线,岩石应力增量随斜平面方向的温度梯度增大而增大;热源温度越高,裂隙水流速越低,岩石温度越高、岩石应力越大,系统达到稳态需要的时间越长。

关键词: 稀疏不规则裂隙岩体, 热源, 裂隙水流速, 三维水流-传热, 温度应力, 模型试验

Abstract: The granites are taken from Beishan area in Gansu province which is selected as a potential high-level radioactive waste disposal repository in China. The sparsely irregularly fractured rock model of 750 mm ×300 mm ×1 000 mm (width × thickness × height) consists of 18 granite rocks with vertical and oblique fractures with thermal sensors, pressure sensors and square strain rosettes installed in the interior, and a heater is placed on one side to study the influence of the heat source temperature and the crack velocity on the temperature and stress of the rock. The test results reveal that: vertical fracture water flow is mainly from the top inlet to the bottom outlet vertically, and oblique fracture water flow is mainly from the side inlet to outlet obliquely, with weak interchange flows at the intersections of the vertical and oblique fractures. Heat conduction and oblique fracture water flow control the temperature distributions in the model because a heater is put between the two oblique fracture intakes and oblique fracture length is less than the vertical fracture, while the vertical fracture water flow hinders heat conduction to the far side of the heat source. Heat transfer paths are mainly from left to right in the upper rock layer and from top to bottom in the middle rock layer and the low rock layer, due to the irregularities of heat conduction and water flow and heat transfer. The temperature gradients are smaller and thus contraction of rock is affected by tensile stress in the upper and lower rock layers, whereas the temperature gradients are larger and expansion of rock is affected by compressive stress in the middle rock layer. The major principal stress direction is being approximately orthogonal to the intersections of the oblique fracture planes and the vertical fracture planes, and the stress increment increases with the increasing of temperature gradients in the oblique planar direction. The higher the heat source temperature is, the lower the fracture water flow velocity is, the higher the rock temperature is, the greater the rock stress is, and the system requires longer time to reach steady state.

Key words: sparsely irregularly fractured rocks, heat source, fracture water velocity, 3D water flow and heat transfer, temperature and stress, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 徐衍, 周晓敏, 和晓楠, 吴涛, 张建岭, 李森. 矿山竖井井壁与围岩热−固耦合作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 217-226.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[6] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[7] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[8] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[9] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[10] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[11] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[12] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[13] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[14] 侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩 变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[15] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!