›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3208-3214.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.021

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

MK模型的拟合方程和预测方程在土-水特征曲线中的应用及参数敏感性分析

谌文武1, 2,毕 骏1, 2,马亚维1, 2,刘 伟1, 2,江 耀1, 2   

  1. 1.兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;2.兰州大学 西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-15 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:谌文武,男,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事地质灾害与文物保护方面工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2014CB744701);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(lzujbky-2014-6)。

Fitted and predicted equations of MK model for soil-water characteristic curve and their parametric analysis

CHEN Wen-wu1, 2, BI Jun1, 2, MA Ya-wei1, 2, LIU Wei1, 2, JIANG Yao1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China, Lanzhou University, Ministry of education, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2014-12-15 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Natural Key Basic Research Development Plan of China (973 Program) (2014CB744701) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2014-6).

摘要: 土-水特征曲线可以预测非饱和土的各种性质(如:非饱和渗透系数、剪应力和热学性能等)。但测量土-水特征曲线耗时久且花费昂贵。为了解决这一问题,目前,很多研究都致力于从基本的岩土工程性质预测土-水特征曲线。基于此,以MK(Modified Kovács)模型的2种形式(拟合方程和预测方程)为土-水特征曲线模型,以Matlab编程语言中的cftool为拟合工具,以西宁黄土、粉砂土、红黏土和冰碛土4种细粒土为研究对象,对比拟合方程和预测方程描述细粒土土-水特征曲线的效果和差异,分析MK模型中黏附饱和度 1解 的变化规律,提出了基于MK模型的饱和度进行参数敏感性分析的计算公式。结果表明:拟合曲线和预测曲线在描述4类典型细粒土土-水特征曲线时均具有较好的效果,但拟合曲线整体上优于预测曲线;土壤质地和黏粒含量影响 值;饱和度对拟合参数 的敏感性较大,对拟合参数 的敏感性较小。

关键词: 土-水特征曲线, MK模型, 拟合, 敏感性分析

Abstract: Soil-water characteristic curves (SWCCs) can be used to predict the properties of unsaturated soils, including unsaturated permeability coefficient, shear strength and thermal property. However, the measurement of SWCCs is time-consuming and expensive. To solve this problem, considerable research efforts have been made to developing the procedures to directly estimate the SWCCs from basic geotechnical properties. Two types of MK models (fitted equations and prediction equations) are used for the SWCCs models, and the cftool in the scientific programming language Matlab is applied to fit the MK models, based on which four types of soils are analyzed, i.e. Xining loess, silty sand, red silty clay, moraine soil. The effects and differences of fitting equations and prediction equations are compared with regard to their capability of describing SWCCs of fine-grained soils. A calculation formulation is developed for parametric analysis based on MK model. It is shown that both the fitted equations and predicted equations of MK model perform well in describing SWCCs of the 4 types of fine-grained soils, though the former is better than the latter; it is also shown that soil texture and clay content influence . The sensitivity analysis shows that the degree of saturation is more sensitive to parameter a than to parameter m.

Key words: soil-water characteristic curves, MK model, fitting, sensitivity analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.3

[1] 吴兴征, 王瑞凯, 辛军霞, . 特定场地下土工构筑物的几何可靠性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2070-2080.
[2] 谌文武, 贾全全, 童艳梅. 莫高窟壁画地仗土-水特征曲线的测定与拟合[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1483-1491.
[3] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[4] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
[5] 郑国锋, 郭晓霞, 邵龙潭, . 基于状态曲面的非饱和土强度准则及其验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1441-1448.
[6] 谌文武, 刘 伟, 王 娟, 孙冠平, 吴玮江, . 黄土饱和度与B值关系试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 834-842.
[7] 王 珍, 曹兰柱, 王 东, . 非均质边坡稳定性上限分析评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 737-742.
[8] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[9] 胡明鉴, 张晨阳, 崔翔, 李焜耀, 唐健健, . 钙质砂中毛细水高度与影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4157-4164.
[10] 陈 磊, 赵学胜, 汤益先, 张 红, . 结合InSAR的幂指数Knothe模型参数拟合与评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 423-431.
[11] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[12] 陶高梁,李 进,庄心善,肖衡林,崔惜琳,徐维生. 利用土中水分蒸发特性和微观孔隙分布规律确定SWCC残余含水率[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1256-1262.
[13] 毕 骏,谌文武,戴鹏飞,林高潮, . 校正系数对不同形式的Van Genuchten方程各拟合参数的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1302-1310.
[14] 陶高梁,柏 亮,袁 波,甘世朝. 土-水特征曲线与核磁共振曲线的关系[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 943-948.
[15] 陈卫忠,马永尚,于洪丹,龚 哲,李香玲,. 泥岩核废料处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 407-416.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!