软土地基超高层建筑补偿桩筏基础案例再分析

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.026

›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3253-3262.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.026

软土地基超高层建筑补偿桩筏基础案例再分析

汤永净^{1, 2}，赵锡宏¹

1.同济大学地下建筑工程系，上海 200092；2.同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部实验室，上海 200092

收稿日期:2014-11-27 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
作者简介:汤永净，女，1965年生，副教授，主要从事地下结构工程和古建筑结构方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No. 51278359）

Re-analysis of case studies of piled raft foundation for super-tall building in soft soils

TANG Yong-jing^{1, 2}, ZHAO Xi-hong¹

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2014-11-27 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51278359).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 坐落于上海的金茂大厦、上海环球金融中心和上海中心大厦三幢闻名世界的超高层建筑的基础均为补偿深埋桩筏基础。在补偿深埋桩筏基础设计中如何充分考虑补偿基础的优越性，如何考虑深埋基础的抗风能力，是值得研究的问题。利用高层建筑与地基基础共同作用的分析方法，结合统计-经验公式对该三幢大楼的桩筏深基础进行了再分析。通过再分析在节约相当数量的桩之后，其地基承载力和变形仍然能够满足设计要求。同时在再分析中进一步探讨优化设计的能力，论证地下连续墙可以分担相当数量的荷载。相关案例的再分析对进一步完善补偿深埋桩筏基础设计理论提出建议，可为国家节省大量投资。

关键词: 补偿基础, 桩筏基础, 桩基变形, 抗风计算方法, 地下连续墙

Abstract: In Shanghai, the foundations of three super-tall buildings, 88-story Jinmao Tower, 101-story Shanghai World Financial Center (SWFC) and 121-story Shanghai Center Tower (SCT), are compensated piled raft (box) foundations with deep embedment. It is worth discussing how to make use of advantages of compensated foundation during foundation design and to estimate the wind resistance of deep embedment of foundation. Based on the analysis of the interaction of high-rise building and ground foundation, the pile raft foundations of the three buildings are analyzed using the statistical empirical formula. A considerable amount of piles can be saved after analyzing, and their bearing capacities and deformations of the foundations can still meet the design requirements. Meanwhile, the capability of optimizing design is further discussed, and the diaphragm wall is proven to be able to share a considerable amount of load. The re-analysis of the relevant cases puts forward suggestions for further improving the design theory of the deep buried pile raft foundation, which can save a lot of investment for China.

Key words: compensated foundation, piled raft foundation, deformation of pile foundation, wind resistance calculation, diaphragm wall

中图分类号:

TU 473.2

汤永净，赵锡宏,. 软土地基超高层建筑补偿桩筏基础案例再分析[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3253-3262.

TANG Yong-jing , ZHAO Xi-hong,. Re-analysis of case studies of piled raft foundation for super-tall building in soft soils[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3253-3262.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	谢芸菲, 迟世春, 周雄雄, . 复杂环境中大规模桩筏基础的优化设计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 486-493.
[2]	郭帅杰, 宋绪国, . 基于沉桩模拟试验的装配式地下连续墙沉桩阻力评估方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 269-274.
[3]	吴昌将, 孙召花, 赖允瑾, 包华, . 软土地区地下连续墙深大基坑的变形性状研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 245-253.
[4]	张骁, 肖军华, 农兴中, 郭佳奇, 吴楠, . 基于HS-Small模型的基坑近接桥桩开挖变形影响区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 263-273.
[5]	王伟，杨敏，上官士青，. 控制差异沉降的桩筏基础桩径优化分析方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 178-184.
[6]	木林隆，连柯楠，黄茂松，李大钧，. 风机梁板式桩筏基础承载特性大型模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1877-1882.
[7]	邓友生，万昌中，闫卫玲，时一波，肖本林，赵明华，. 大型圆形沉井结构应力及其周边沉降计算[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 502-508.
[8]	郑刚，王琦，邓旭，刘庆晨，. 不同地连墙插入深度下承压含水层减压降水对既有隧道的影响[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 412-421.
[9]	张延军，木林隆，钱建固，黄茂松 , . 梁板式桩筏基础现场测试分析[J]. , 2014, 35(11): 3253-3258.
[10]	李婉，木林隆，连柯楠 , . 考虑基础刚度影响的风机梁板式桩筏基础模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2875-2880.
[11]	纠永志，黄茂松，木林隆，连柯楠 . 多向荷载作用下层状地基刚性桩筏基础分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 849-855.
[12]	徐杨青，刘国锋，盛永清 . 深基坑嵌岩地下连续墙隔渗效果分析与评价方法研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2905-2910.
[13]	汪宏伟，纠永志，木林隆 . 陆上风轮机梁板基础受力特性简化分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 205-210.
[14]	连柯楠，木林隆，黄茂松，李大钧 . 国华通辽风电场三期工程梁板式桩筏基础性状数值分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 290-296.
[15]	王成华，刘庆晨. 考虑基坑开挖影响的群桩基础竖向承载性状数值分析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1851-1856.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

软土地基超高层建筑补偿桩筏基础案例再分析

Re-analysis of case studies of piled raft foundation for super-tall building in soft soils

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0