›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3299-3308.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.032

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用超声尾波干涉评价页岩应力敏感性

王剑波1, 2,葛洪魁1, 2,王小琼1, 2,汪道兵1, 2,陈 浩1, 2   

  1. 1.中国石油大学(北京) 非常规天然气研究院,北京 102249;2.中国石油大学(北京) 中石油非常规油气重点试验室,北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-12 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 葛洪魁,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事非常规油气开发、岩石物理和钻完井的研究工作。E-mail:gehongkui@163.com E-mail:gsggwjb@163.com
  • 作者简介:王剑波,男,1989年生,在读硕士研究生,主要从事岩石物理学的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金联合基金(U1562215),国家自然科学基金青年基金(41304141),中国石油大学(北京)青年创新团队C计划(编号C201601),973课题(2015CB250903),国家自然科学基金重大项目课题(51490652)。

Using ultrasonic coda wave interferometry to evaluate shale stress sensitivity

WANG Jian-bo1, 2, GE Hong-kui1, 2, WANG Xiao-qiong1, 2, WANG Dao-bing1, 2, CHEN Hao1, 2   

  1. 1. Unconventional Natural Gas Institute, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Unconventional Petroleum and Gas, China National Petroleum Corporation, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2014-12-12 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1562215), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41304141), the Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (C201601), the National Basic Research Program of China ( 2015CB250903) and the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51490652).

摘要: 岩石应力敏感性是岩石内部微裂隙发育的一种反映,对于致密储层物性和成缝能力(可压性)评价具有重要作用。由于页岩油气储层基质模量高,对应力的敏感性相对较弱,需要寻求新的高灵敏度测试方法。尾波干涉是运用介质中的散射波来监测介质微弱变化的一种测量方法,对岩石应力变化具有较高的敏感性。借助GCTS RTR-1500高温、高压三轴测试试验系统,对重庆城口县下寒武统鲁家坪组露头页岩开展尾波干涉试验,研究了页岩尾波发育规律及其对应力的响应,分析了页岩在不同围压下的应力敏感性。结果表明:页岩尾波应力敏感性大于直达波,S波应力敏感性大于P波;尾波波速相对变化率随应力的变化能够较好地反映页岩内部裂隙的产生,与扩容点有很好的对应关系;围压使部分裂隙闭合,天然裂隙密度减小,页岩应力敏感性系数降低。尾波干涉可作为页岩的应力敏感性和成缝能力评价的方法。

关键词: 页岩, 尾波干涉, 应力敏感性, 应变, 成缝能力

Abstract: Rock stress sensitivity is a reflection of the development of microcracks in the rock, which plays an important role in the evaluation of the physical properties and the fracture forming ability of tight reservoirs. Due to the high modulus of the matrix and relatively weak sensitivity to stress of shale,a new test method of high sensitivity is required. Coda wave interferometry is a measurement method for monitoring weak variation based on scattered wave of media, and it has a high sensitivity to the change of rock stress. In this paper, coda wave interferometry tests are conducted on the Lower Cambrain Lujiaping Formation shale from Chengkou, Chongqing using GCTS RTR-1500 high temperature and pressure triaxial testing system, the development and response to stress of coda are studied, and the stress sensitivity of shale is analyzed under different confining pressures. The results show that the shale stress sensitivity to coda wave is greater than to the direct wave; S-wave stress sensitivity is greater than P-wave. The relative variation ratio of the coda wave velocity varied with the stress can reflect the generating of internal fissures, and it has a good relationship with the corresponding expansion point; confining pressure leads part of the fractures to close and natural fracture density to decrease, which results in a reduction in sensitivity coefficient of shale stress. Coda wave interferometry is available as evaluation of shale stress sensitivity and fracturability.

Key words: shale, coda wave interferometry, stress sensitivity, strain, fracturability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45

[1] 张科, 李娜, 陈宇龙, 刘文连, . 裂隙砂岩变形破裂过程中应变场及红外辐射 温度场演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 95-105.
[2] 卞康, 陈彦安, 刘建, 崔德山, 李一冉, 梁文迪, 韩啸. 不同吸水时间下页岩卸荷破坏特征的 颗粒离散元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 355-367.
[3] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[4] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[5] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[6] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[7] 朱楠, 刘春原, 赵献辉, 王文静, . 不同应力路径下K0固结结构性黏土 微观结构特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1899-1910.
[8] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[9] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[10] 陶帅, 董毅, 韦昌富, . 环境湿度可控的土体小应变刚度试验系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[11] 李佳龙, 李钢, 于龙. 隔离非线性平面应变单元模型及其 在Drucker-Prager模型中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[12] 侯志强, 王宇, 刘冬桥, 李长洪, 刘昊. 三轴疲劳-卸围压条件下大理岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[13] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
[14] 李敏, 孟德骄, 姚昕妤. 基于温度效应下二灰固化石油污染滨海盐渍土 力学特性优化固化需求[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1203-1210.
[15] 周恩全, 宗之鑫, 王琼, 陆建飞, 左熹. 橡胶-粉土轻质混合土中管道动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!