›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3317-3323.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.034

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土地基上海堤变形与失稳的离心模型试验与数值分析

朱 斌1, 2,冯凌云1, 2,柴能斌1, 2,郭小青1, 2   

  1. 1.浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江 杭州310058;2.浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-04 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:朱斌,男,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事海洋岩土工程等方面的教学和科研。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51179169)

Centrifugal model test and numerical analysis of deformation and stability of seawall on soft clay

ZHU Bin1, 2, FENG Ling-yun1, 2, CHAI Neng-bin1, 2, GUO Xiao-qing1, 2   

  1. 1. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2016-01-04 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51179169).

摘要: 软土地基上海堤的沉降及稳定性是围垦海堤工程的关键问题。针对海堤工程开展离心机模型试验,分别通过变加速度法及恒加速度法模拟海堤填筑过程和竣工后稳定运行过程,得到了海堤施工期及工后沉降变化规律,并通过PIV技术观察海堤的破坏模式;在此基础上,采用GeoStudio软件分别基于总应力及有效应力分析法,分析了海堤施工期及竣工后稳定运行期海堤的整体稳定性随时间变化规律。物理和数值模拟结果表明,离心模型试验能一定程度上模拟海堤的变形及失稳情况,且与数值分析结果吻合较好。海堤施工期瞬时失稳的滑裂面贯穿软土地基,并使海堤滑体发生了超过1 m的瞬时沉降。海堤填筑完成后地基超静孔隙水压力逐渐消散、海堤稳定性安全系数随时间不断提高。海堤竖向和水平位移最大值分别位于堤轴线处及坡脚处。

关键词: 离心模型试验, 围垦海堤, 软土地基, 沉降, 稳定性

Abstract: Deformation and stability of the seawall on soft clay are the key problems for reclamation engineering. Centrifugal model test is carried out to obtain the soft clay settlements, where the variable acceleration method and constant acceleration method are applied to simulate the construction process and operating phase, respectively. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique is also introduced to capture the potential failure mode of seawall. Further, based on the total stress and effective stress analysis methods, the changes of global stability with time are analyzed by using GeoStudio software in both the construction process and operating phrase. Physical and numerical simulation results show that the centrifugal model test is able to reflect the deformation and stability behaviors of the seawall to a certain extent; and its data is in good agreement with that obtained by numerical simulation. The sliding surface of the seawall passes through the soft clay, leading to an immediate settlement of more than 1 m. In addition, the safety factor of global stability increases gradually with time after the seawall construction due to the dissipation of excess pore pressure. The maximum vertical and horizontal displacements are located at the axis and the toe of the seawall, respectively.

Key words: centrifugal model test, reclamation seawall, soft clay, settlement, stability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435

[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[5] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[6] 周恩全, 宗之鑫, 王琼, 陆建飞, 左熹. 橡胶-粉土轻质混合土中管道动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1388-1395.
[7] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[8] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[9] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[10] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[11] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[12] 徐进, 王少伟, 杨伟涛. 水位变化下可压缩土层的黏弹性耦合变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1065-1073.
[13] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[14] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[15] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!