›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3401-3409.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.12.008

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同降雨模式下膨胀岩边坡模型试验研究

范秋雁1,刘金泉2,杨典森2,袁敬强2   

  1. 1. 广西大学 资源与冶金学院,广西 南宁 530004;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-19 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘金泉,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道突水突泥灾害致灾机理及控制技术研究。E-mail: jinquanliu99@163.com E-mail:qiuyan@gxu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:范秋雁,男,1961年生,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.41162012);广西自然科学基金(No.2010GXNSFA013005)

Model test study of expansive rock slope under different types of precipitation

FAN Qiu-yan1, LIU Jin-quan2, YANG Dian-sen2, YUAN Jing-qiang2   

  1. 1. College of Resources and Metallurgy, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2014-11-19 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41162012) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2010GXNSFA013005).

摘要: 采用原状膨胀岩进行室内边坡模型试验,研究膨胀岩边坡在连续降雨和湿-干循环模式下的变形和水分入渗特性,揭示两种模式下膨胀岩边坡的变形破坏模式。试验发现,连续降雨模式下初期数次降雨对膨胀岩边坡变形影响最大,有明显的水平方向位移,后期变形很小且趋向稳定。湿-干循环模式下边坡膨胀变形及深部岩体含水率降雨完成后一段时间才达到峰值,随循环次数及降雨量增大,边坡变形速率及变形量都明显增大,岩体裂隙不断发育,水分入渗深度增大,但限于表面一定深度,对深部岩体影响较小。试验结果对工程应用有一定的指导意义:连续降雨模式初期膨胀较大,须加强和完善初期的排水措施,做好边坡的支挡防护措施;湿-干循环模式下,随循环次数增加,做好坡面的防护措施,以起到保湿防渗作用;两种降雨模式均说明纯膨胀性泥岩边坡不发生典型的圆弧滑动等破坏模式,而工程边坡的滑动多发生在软弱夹层上,因此,要做好该类边坡的软弱夹层特性勘察,对于不含软弱夹层的纯泥岩边坡要重点监测其浅层变形特性。

关键词: 膨胀岩, 边坡, 连续降雨, 湿干循环, 变形, 体积含水率, 模型试验

Abstract: The indoor slope model tests were conducted to investigate the deformation, water infiltration and failure characteristics of an expansive rock slope under different types of precipitation. Significant horizontal displacement was found under the initial rainfall in continuous rainfall mode, whereas the later deformation was small and tended to be stable. The peak values of displacement and deep rock moisture content were reached at a period of time after rainfall ceased. With the increase of cycle number and rainfall, the slope deformation and the deformation rate increased significantly, and the rock fissures developed further, resulting in an increase in water infiltration depth. This was observed in the soil layer close to the ground surface, but not in the deep rock. The experimental results imply that, due to initial large swelling-induced deformation in the continuous rainfall mode, the drainage and protective measures should be enforced and improved; in the wet-dry cycles mode, the anti-seepage measures for slope surface should be improved to resist the infiltration of rain with the increase of cycle number. In additional, the typical circular sliding failure of purely expansive rock slope was not found in aforementioned two rainfall modes in the tests. However, the engineering slope failure often occurs in the weak interlayer. Therefore, further investigation into the weak interlayer in expansive rock slope should be conducted , and for the mudstone slope without weak interlayer, more attention should be paid to monitoring the shallow deformation characteristics.

Key words: expansive rock, slope, continuous rainfall, wet-dry cycles, deformation, volumetric moisture content, model test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 458+.4

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[3] 郭健, 陈健, 胡杨. 基于小波智能模型的地铁车站基坑变形 时序预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 299-304.
[4] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[5] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[6] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[7] 段君义, 杨果林, 胡敏, 邱明明, 俞昀, . 加卸载作用下加筋垫层变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[8] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[9] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[10] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[11] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[12] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[13] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[14] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[15] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!