›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 3506-3512.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.12.020

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

爆炸液化场地中浅埋钢筋混凝土结构动力响应的现场试验研究

陈育民1, 2,张意江1, 2,王维国1, 2,陈晨伟1, 2   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-30 出版日期:2016-12-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:陈育民,男,1981年生,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事土动力学与土工抗震领域的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.51379067);国家自然科学基金重点国际(地区)合作研究项目(No.51420105013);教育部创新团队发展计划(IRT_15R17)。

Experimental investigation into dynamic response of shallow-buried reinforced concrete structure in blast-induced liquefied sandy foundation

CHEN Yu-min1, 2, ZHANG Yi-jiang1, 2, WANG Wei-guo1, 2, CHEN Chen-wei1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2014-11-30 Online:2016-12-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51379067), The Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51420105013) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_15R17).

摘要: 饱和砂土地基在爆炸荷载作用下会发生液化,地基上的结构物将受到爆炸荷载及地基液化的双重作用,从而产生不均匀沉降和破坏性变形。基于大型现场爆炸液化试验,对场地上钢筋混凝土(RC)结构的动力响应和地基液化后RC结构的变形进行了分析研究。结果表明:液化场地中浅埋RC结构产生了明显的不均匀沉降,且最大沉降量达到结构高度的10%,结构差异沉降达到最大沉降量的1/5,结构沉降变形在液化后15 h时基本稳定;RC结构表面未产生明显的裂缝,动态拉、压应变均在400 ??以内,不会对结构造成显著破坏;结构动力响应表现为柱侧加速度峰值明显大于梁侧,但柱侧动力稳定所需时间较梁侧短,即柱承受了更大的瞬时冲击力且其抵抗瞬时冲击力的能力更强。研究结果可以为在可液化地基中的浅埋RC结构稳定设计等工程情况提供参考。

关键词: 爆炸液化, 浅埋钢筋混凝土结构, 动力响应, 沉降变形, 原位试验

Abstract: Saturated sand foundation may be liquefied under explosive load. Structures on the foundation will suffer a dual influence of explosive load and sand liquefaction, which causes uneven settlement and destructive deformation. Based on a large-scale field test of liquefied foundation induced by embedded blast, the dynamic response of the shallow-buried reinforced concrete (RC) structures subjected to explosion and its deformations after liquefaction are examined. It is indicated that, obvious uneven settlement of the RC structure occurs; and the maximum settlement reaches 10% of the height of the RC structure; and differential settlement reaches 1/5 of the maximum settlement. The settlement comes to be stable in 15 hours after the explosion. There is no obvious crack appearing on the surface of the structure; and the dynamic tensile and compressive strains are both under 400 ??, which would not cause significant damage to the structure. The acceleration peak of the column is larger than that of the girder; however, the time required for the dynamic stability of column is shorter than that of the girder, i.e. column suffers a larger instantaneous impulse and has stronger ability to resist instantaneous impulse. The results provide references for the seismic design of shallow-buried RC structures in the liquefiable soils.

Key words: blast induced liquefaction, shallow-buried reinforced concrete structures, dynamic response, settlement and deformation, in-situ test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441

[1] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[3] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[4] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[5] 王立安, 赵建昌, 侯小强, 刘生纬, 王作伟. 非均匀饱和半空间的Lamb问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[6] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[7] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[8] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[9] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[10] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[12] 杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧 道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[13] 姜立春, 罗恩民, 沈彬彬, . 多自由度模型法的立体采空区群爆破 动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2407-2415.
[14] 邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[15] 史 吏, 王慧萍, 孙宏磊, 潘晓东, . 群桩基础引发饱和地基振动的近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1750-1760.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!