›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 41-48.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.01.006

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

扭剪荷载作用下饱和南京砂不排水特性试验研究

孙 奇1,董全杨2, 3,蔡袁强1,王 军2, 3   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 温州大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 温州 325035; 3. 温州大学 浙江省软弱土地基与海涂围垦工程技术重点实验室,浙江 温州 325035
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-02 出版日期:2017-01-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 董全杨,男,1987年生,讲师,主要从事土动力学及砂土本构理论等方面的研究。E-mail: dongqyyeb@163.com E-mail:sunqi_131@163.com
  • 作者简介:孙奇,女,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事土动力学及砂土本构理论等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51508417,No. 51238009,No. 51278383)

Experimental study of undrained properties of saturated Nanjing sand under torsional shear loading

SUN Qi1, DONG Quan-yang2, 3, CAI Yuan-qiang1, WANG Jun2,3   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China; 3. The Key Laboratory of Engineering and Technology for Soft Soil Foundation and Tideland Reclamation of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325035, China
  • Received:2015-02-02 Online:2017-01-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508417, 51238009, 51278383).

摘要: 通过空心圆柱扭剪仪对不同相对密实度的饱和南京砂分别进行了单调扭剪不排水、排水试验以及循环扭剪不排水试验。试验结果表明:在单调扭剪试验中,试样相转换线的位置与排水条件无关,但相对密实度较大试样的相转换线斜率小于相对密实度较小的试样。在循环扭剪不排水试验中,对于相对密实度较小的试样,当其有效应力路径接近单调扭剪荷载作用下具有相同初始条件试样的相转换线时,孔压急剧增加,扭剪应变迅速增大,试样出现不稳定现象,随后发生初始液化;对于相对密实度较大的试样,当其有效应力路径接近单调扭剪荷载作用下试样的相转换线时,试样出现循环活动现象,随着循环扭剪荷载的继续施加,有效应力路径表现为以破坏线为边界且呈“蝴蝶”形状的一系列重叠的回滞环,此时孔压在某一常值上下波动,累积孔压不再增加。具有相同初始条件的试样在循环和单调扭剪荷载作用下得到的相转换线几乎相同,这一规律不受相对密实度的影响。

关键词: 单调扭剪, 循环扭剪, 饱和砂土, 液化

Abstract: Undrained and drained monotonic as well as undrained cyclic torsional shear loading tests are carried out on saturated Nanjing sand at various relative densities in a hollow cylinder apparatus. The test results indicate that the phase transformation line appears to be independent of drainage conditions, but is lower when relative density is denser under monotonic torsional shear loading. In the cyclic torsional shear loading tests under undrained condition, as to the loose specimen, the excess pore pressure and the torsional strain increase rapidly when the stress path approaches the phase transformation line defined under monotonic torsional shear loading with identical initial conditions, which lead to specimen in instable state. Subsequently, initial liquefaction occurs. For the dense specimen, it shows cyclic mobility when the stress path approaches the phase transformation line defined under monotonic torsional shear loading with identical initial conditions. With the loading going on, the stress path presents a series of papilionaceous overlapped hysteresis loops with the border of failure line. At the moment, the excess pore pressure fluctuates around a nearly constant value and cumulative pore pressure no longer increases. The phase transformation line defined under cyclic loading appears to coincide with the phase transformation line defined under monotonic loading, which seems independent of the relative density.

Key words: monotonic torsional shear, cyclic torsional shear, saturated sand, liquefaction

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[2] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[3] 马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[4] 熊辉, 杨丰, . 文克尔地基模型下液化土桩基水平振动响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 103-110.
[5] 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, 孙锐. 液化判别临界曲线的变化模式与一般规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3603-3609.
[6] 杨洋, 孙锐, 陈卓识, 袁晓铭. 基于土层常规参数的剪切波速液化概率计算公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2755-2764.
[7] 汪俊敏, 熊勇林, 杨骐莱, 桑琴扬, 黄强. 不饱和土动弹塑性本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2323-2331.
[8] 邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[9] 庄海洋, 付继赛, 陈 苏, 陈国兴, 王雪剑, . 微倾斜场地中地铁地下结构周围地基液化与变形特性振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1263-1272.
[10] 魏 星, 张 昭, 王 刚, 张建民, . 饱和砂土液化后大变形机制的离散元细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1596-1602.
[11] 裴向军, 朱 凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及 滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[12] 董建勋, 刘海笑, 李 洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[13] 李晶, 陈育民, 方志, 高晗, 飞田哲男, 周葛, . 减饱和砂土缓倾场地的液化性状分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4352-4360.
[14] 王丽艳, 巩文雪, 曹晓婷, 姜朋明, 王炳辉. 砾钢渣抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[15] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 液化自由场地震响应大型振动台模型试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!