›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 392-399.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.012

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

细/粗粒二元结构边坡的排水防渗效果试验研究

吴庆华1 ,2,张家发2,崔皓东2,朱国胜2,刘习银2   

  1. 1.中国地质大学 教育部长江三峡库区地质灾害研究中心,湖北 武汉 430074; 2.长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-16 出版日期:2017-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:吴庆华,男,1981年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土非饱和渗流与地下水环境研究。
  • 基金资助:

    中国地质大学教育部长江三峡库区地质灾害研究中心开放性基金(No.TGRC201403);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41402213,No.51279016);国家“十二五”科技支撑计划(No.2011BAB10B04);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费(No.CKSF2014058/YT)

Experimental study of drainage control of slopes with fine-coarse grain structure

WU Qing-hua1, 2, ZHANG Jia-fa2, CUI Hao-dong2, ZHU Guo-sheng2, LIU Xi-yin2   

  1. 1. Three Gorges Research Center for Geo-hazard of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2015-06-16 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Open Fund of Three Gorges Research Center for Geo-hazard, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences (TGRC201403), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41402213, 51279016), the National Science and Technology Support Program (“Twelfth Five-Year”) (2011BAB10B04) and the Basic Scientific Research Foundation for the Central Level and Public Welfare Institution (CKSF2014058/YT).

摘要: 膨胀土边坡开挖时因干-湿循环作用形成裂隙,导致降雨入渗深层土壤,影响边坡稳定性。针对传统工艺存在生态效果差与使用寿命短等不足,进行了6组兼顾生态和防渗功能的非饱和上细下粗二元结构的边坡排水防渗效果的试验研究。采用亮蓝染色示踪方法直接观测了降雨条件下二元结构水分入渗过程,其结果表明:粗粒层粒径越大,级配越差,越易形成优先渗流通道,难以形成连续的水平渗流场,排水效果差。降雨直接入渗至边坡防护层,增加了其入渗边坡土体失稳的风险。通过监测侧向与底部排水体积,分析结果表明:二元结构具有较好的防渗排水效果,其稳定排水效率和综合排水效率分别介于80%~100%和43%~79%之间,随着粗粒层粒径减小、颗粒级配变好,稳定排水效率呈先减小后增加的趋势,而综合排水效率却呈先增加后缓慢减小的趋势。因此,从排水效果和工程材料造价等角度考虑,认为方案4最优。该研究成果可为南水北调膨胀土边坡治理以及其他工程的边坡防渗问题处理提供技术支撑。

关键词: 二元结构, 边坡, 排水, 防渗, 膨胀土

Abstract: Excavation of the expansive soil slope results in fissure development due to drying-wetting cycles, and affects the stability. Although the materials of cement panel and geotextile are generally used to deal with the drainage problem successfully, their service lives are short and less ecological friendly. Therefore, a capillary barrier with dual soil structure consisting of a relatively fine soil layer above a relatively coarse soil layer, is introduced in this paper considering both ecological and drainage-seepage controlling functions. The aim of this article is to investigate the effects of particle size and distribution of the coarse soil layer on the capillary seepage flow. Six groups of tests are conducted to monitor the soil water infiltration process under the condition of rainfall using the brilliant blue dyeing tracer. The results show that preferential flow and discontinuous horizontal seepage field appear in coarse soil with larger particle size and worse particle distribution, and worse capillary barrier effect. The measured vertical and horizontal drainage volumes indicate that the dual structure presents good drainage control. The parameter of steady drainage efficiency and the total drainage efficiency are used to evaluate the effect of capillary barrier. The steady drainage efficiency between 80% and 100% is small firstly and then increases with smaller grain size and better particle distribution of the coarse soil layer. The variation of total drainage efficiency between 43% and 79% is just opposite compared to the former. In summary, the dual structure of the fourth scheme is suggested to apply the South-to-North Water Transfer Project, according to the optimal seepage control efficiency and the lower cost of coarse material. The research results can be directly applied to the seepage control of expansive soil slopes in other projects.

Key words: dual structure, slope, drainage, seepage controlling, expansive soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[2] 刘争宏, 张龙, 郑建国, 张炜, 于永堂, . 滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.
[3] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[4] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[5] 荣驰, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 张铮, 张毅, 张庆艳, 刘奇, . 新型水玻璃−酯类注浆材料及其固沙体特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[6] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[7] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[8] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[9] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[10] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[11] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[12] 李红坡, 陈征, 冯健雪, 蒙宇涵, 梅国雄, . 双层地基水平排水砂垫层位置优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 437-444.
[13] 刘家顺, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, 孙嘉宝, . 部分排水条件下饱和黏土 渐近状态本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 485-491.
[14] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[15] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!