›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 462-470.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.020

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多级框架锚索和抗滑桩联合作用下边坡抗震性能的振动台试验研究

付 晓1, 2,张建经1, 2,周立荣1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-23 出版日期:2017-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 周立荣,女,1973年生,博士,副教授,主要从事滑坡灾害机理及防治技术。E-mail:857556877@qq.com E-mail:f_u_xiao@126.com
  • 作者简介:付晓,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程抗震方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    交通运输部建设科技项目(No. 2013318800020)

Shaking table test of seismic response of slope reinforced by combination of anti-slide piles and multi-frame foundation beam with anchor cable

FU Xiao1, 2, ZHANG Jian-jing1, 2, ZHOU Li-rong1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031,China
  • Received:2016-03-23 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Research Program of Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China (2013318800020).

摘要: 基于原型边坡设计了大型振动台模型试验,通过监测锚索轴力、桩身土压力、坡体加速度和坡面位移时程,研究多级锚索框架梁与双排抗滑桩组合结构加固含软弱夹层岩质边坡的地震动力特性。试验结果表明:在0.15g El Centro地震波激振时锚索预应力产生损失,最大损失比为23%,建议对变形等级要求较高的边坡在锚索抗震设计时适当提高预应力初始值1.2~1.3倍;沿边坡不同高度布置的锚索其轴力响应峰值几乎同一时刻到达,而峰值增加比例呈现出空间非一致性,在锚索抗震设计时应以坡体中部抗滑桩为界将边坡分为上、下区分别考虑;坡脚抗滑桩受荷段、锚固段土压力均随着输入地震波峰值加速度的增加而增大,主动土压力分布规律将由“上小下大”转变成“上大下小”的形状,被动土压力Ⅰ、Ⅱ区的分界点将向桩体下部发展;锚索与抗滑桩在地震时表现为协同工作机制,工程设计中要充分考虑地震效应对桩锚下滑力分担比的影响。该研究成果可为更加合理地考虑地震区锚索框架梁与抗滑桩组合支护结构的设计提供指导。

关键词: 锚索, 预应力损失, 协同工作, 抗滑桩, 抗震设计

Abstract: A large-scale shaking table model test is designed to study the dynamic behaviors of slope reinforced by multi-frame foundation beam with anchor cable and double-row anti-slide piles under seismic loading. Several critical parameters are monitored during the test, including axial force of pre-stressed anchor cable, earth pressure on piles, acceleration of slope body and displacement-time relationship of slope surface. Experimental results show that the pre-stressing of anchor cable varies with input seismic wave, and its maximum value of pre-stress loss reaches 23% when input wave is El Centro seismic wave with an amplitude of 0.15g. The test results suggest that the applied pre-stress value should be risen up to 1.2 to 1.3 times of the designed value for reinforced slope with strict deflection limit. The axial forces of anchor cables installed at different altitudes reach the maximum almost simultaneously, but the increase proportion of peak axial force demonstrates non-uniformity in space, so the aseismic design of anchor cable should be divided into upper and lower sections with anti-slide piles installed in the middle section of the slope. The earth pressure increases with the amplitude of input seismic waves. As the amplitude increases, the distribution of active earth pressure changes from ‘upper small-lower big shape’ to ‘upper big-lower small shape’. The demarcation line between the passive earth pressure zones I and II shifts to the bottom of pile. Anchor cables and anti-slide piles should perform as a collaborative structure under earthquake, so the effect of earthquake on the sliding force sharing ratio between pile and anchor cable should be carefully considered. The results can provide references for the design of anchor cable frame beam and anti-slide pile supporting structure in earthquake zone.

Key words: anchor cable, prestress loss, cooperative work mechanism, anti-slide pile, aseismic design

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1

[1] 禹海涛, 张正伟, 李 攀, . 地下结构抗震设计的改进等效反应加速度法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2401-2410.
[2] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[3] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[4] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[5] 孙来宾, 肖世国, . 抗滑桩受荷段前侧有限范围地层的 地基抗力系数取值方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[6] 陈冲, 王卫, 吕华永, . 基于复合抗滑桩模型加固边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3207-3217.
[7] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[8] 魏少伟, 隋颜阳, 杨建民, . 圆形与矩形截面抗滑桩抗滑性能的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 951-961.
[9] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[10] 张玲, 陈金海, 赵明华. 考虑土拱效应的悬臂式抗滑桩最大桩间距确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4497-4505.
[11] 雷 达, 蒋关鲁, 孙圣杰, 戚志慧, 李安洪, . 基于振动台试验的抗滑桩加固斜坡桥基研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 127-134.
[12] 董志宏, 丁秀丽, 黄书岭, 邬爱清, 陈胜宏, 周 钟, . 高地应力区大型洞室锚索时效受力特征 及长期承载风险分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 351-362.
[13] 马显春, 罗 刚, 邓建辉, 上官力, . 陡倾滑面堆积层滑坡抗滑桩锚固深度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 157-168.
[14] 王 哲, 王乔坎, 马少俊, 薛 毅, 许四法, . 扩大头可回收预应力锚索极限抗拔力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 202-208.
[15] 陈 军, 梁文鹏, 应宏伟, . 大直径水泥土锚索合理间距的试验与数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 374-380.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!