›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 549-556.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.031

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地下洞室分期开挖应力扰动特征与规律研究

李建贺1,盛 谦1,朱泽奇1,牛利敏2,卞晓曼1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-26 出版日期:2017-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:李建贺,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下工程开挖扰动和数值模拟方面的基础性研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No. 2015CB057905);NSFC-云南联合基金重点支持项目(No. U1402231));国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51279202,No.51409263)。

Stress disturbance characteristics and laws of underground cavern during stage excavation

LI Jian-he1, SHENG Qian1, ZHU Ze-qi1, NIU Li-min2, BIAN Xiao-man1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2015-05-26 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China(973 Program) (2015CB057905), the NSFC-United Fund Key Support Project of Yunnan(U1402231) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51279202, 51409263).

摘要: 针对地下洞室开挖扰动分析中常忽略应力主轴旋转以及应力扰动无法量化的现状,以大岗山水电站地下厂房为研究实例,根据主应力方向与洞室横断面及洞轴线之间的几何关系,定义了描述应力主轴旋转的特征角。研究表明,洞室开挖引起了顶拱和边墙不同程度的应力释放和主方向旋转,围岩主应力均在开挖当期卸荷强烈,主应力方向在开挖当期和后继一个开挖期中旋转强烈,且顶拱和边墙部位主应力方向调整具有一定的共性,表现为最小主应力方向最终近似垂直于洞室开挖面,而最大主应力与中主应力方向则近似在平行于开挖面的平面内调整。在此基础上,考虑应力主轴旋转影响,定义应力扰动指标SDI作为描述洞室围岩应力场扰动程度的力学表征量,研究了大岗山水电站地下厂房围岩应力场扰动的时间演化过程和空间分布特征,并将数值模拟得到的强应力扰动区与现场测试的开挖损伤区进行了对比分析,相关认识和结论具有一定理论和工程意义。

关键词: 地下厂房, 开挖, 主应力方向, 特征角, 应力扰动

Abstract: Based on the underground powerhouse of Dagangshan Hydropower Station, the characteristic angles according to the geometric relationship between the principal stress direction and the cavern space position are defined, in order to describe the rotation of the principal axes of stresses. The research shows that different degrees of stress release and principal axis rotation are induced in the arch and the side wall during the excavation. The principal stresses in surrounding rock unload intensely in the current excavation, while the direction of principal stresses rotates violently in the current and subsequent excavation stages. Furthermore, the principal stress direction adjustment has certain similarities in the arch and the side wall. The final direction of the minimum principal stress is approximately perpendicular to the cavern free surface, and the directions of the maximum principal stress and intermediate principal stress are adjusted almost parallel to the excavation surface plane. On this basis, considering the effect of principal stress rotation, the stress disturbance index (SDI) is defined as a mechanical characterization quantity, and using it to describe the disturbance degree of stress field in the surrounding rock. SDI is applied to study the time evolution, along with the space distribution characteristics of stress field disturbance in the underground powerhouse of Dagangshan Hydropower Station. The strong stress disturbance zone obtained by numerical simulation is compared with the excavation damaged zone by field test, and the related understanding and conclusions are of certain theoretical and engineering significances.

Key words: underground powerhouse, excavation, principal stress direction, characteristic angle, stress disturbance

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45

[1] 毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[4] 王洪新, 沈旭凯. 考虑支撑作用的基坑抗隆起稳定安全系数计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1680-1689.
[5] 杨艳霜, 周辉, 梅松华, 张占荣, 李金兰. 高地应力硬脆性围岩开挖损伤区时效性扩展案例分析——特征与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1357-1365.
[6] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[7] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[8] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
[9] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[10] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[11] 柯锦福, 王水林, 郑宏, 杨永涛, . 基于修正对称和反对称分解的 三维数值流形元法应用推广[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 695-706.
[12] 丁智, 张霄, 金杰克, 王立忠, . 基坑全过程开挖及邻近地铁隧道变形实测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 415-423.
[13] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[14] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 张广东, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, . 不同卸荷速率下矩形巷道变形及 声发射特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3309-3318.
[15] 张坤勇, 臧振君, 李 威, 文德宝, Charkley Frederick Nai, . 土体三维卸荷弹塑性模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1313-1323.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!