›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 714-722.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.03.013

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同沉积年代泥岩卸荷力学特性试验研究

霍 亮1,周 雁2,杨春和1, 3,冒海军3,刘俊新4,陈西磊4   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点试验室,重庆 400044;2. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071;4. 西南科技大学,四川 绵阳 621010
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-07 出版日期:2017-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:霍亮,男,1988年生,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    重庆大学国家重点试验室开放基金(No.2011DA105287-FW201404)。

Experimental study of unloading mechanical behaviour of mudstone in different geological era

HUO Liang1, ZHOU Yan2, YANG Chun-he1, 3, MAO Hai-jun3, LIU Jun-xin4, CHEN Xi-lei4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 4. Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China
  • Received:2015-04-07 Online:2017-03-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Chongqing University(2011DA105287-FW201404).

摘要: 鄂西渝东地区蕴藏着丰富的油气资源,纵向主要分布有侏罗系和志留系两套泥岩盖层,区域经历的抬升剥蚀过程会导致盖层破裂,影响油气保存。选取沉积于侏罗系沙溪庙组、桐竹园组以及志留系龙马溪组的3个典型区块泥岩,开展10~50 MPa 5种围压下的三轴卸荷力学试验,探索卸荷对泥岩力学特性影响。研究表明:随卸荷围压增大,3类泥岩的卸荷效应均增强,侏罗系泥岩体现在卸荷变形增大,志留系泥岩主要体现在沿卸荷方向的侧向膨胀;对比常规三轴压缩试验中岩石破裂时的应力状态,卸荷得到的泥岩强度均上升,内摩擦角更大,泥岩侧压破裂系数呈负指数分布,随围压增大而减小,并且沉积时间短浅的泥岩在抬升剥蚀过程中更容易产生破坏;岩石破裂形态由岩石组构与应力环境共同决定,沙溪庙组泥岩的裂纹形态为单一剪切断面破坏,并且断口平缓,而桐竹园组泥岩与龙马溪组泥岩则随围压升高,由单一剪切断面向共轭剪切破坏过渡,其中桐竹园组泥岩断口平滑,龙马溪组泥岩断口则呈现锯齿状。

关键词: 泥岩, 地质年代, 卸荷, 侧胀系数, 侧压破裂系数, 破坏形态

Abstract: Western Hubei-Eastern Chongqing region is rich in oil and gas resources, and the cap rocks are Jurassic mudstone and Silurian mudstone from top to bottom. However, this region has been suffered long term uplift and erosion, which may result in cap rock generating fractures. To investigate mechanical properties of mudstones during geological evolution, three typical tectonic mudstones deposited in the Jurassic Shaximiao formation, Tongzhuyuan formation and Silurian Longmaixi group, are selected to conduct triaxial unloading tests under five different confining pressures from 10 to 50 MPa. The results show that the unloading effect of these three mudstones is enhanced with the increase of unloading confining pressure, and the Jurassic mudstone increases in unloading deformation, the Silurian mudstone mainly exhibits the lateral expansion along the unloading direction. In comparison with the stress state of rock failure in the normal triaxial compression test, under unloading condition, the unloading strength of the mudstone and the internal frictional angle are increased. The mudstone lateral fracture coefficient is negative exponential distribution and decreases with the increase of the confining pressure. The mudstone with short sedimentary history is more prone to damage during the uplift and denudation process. The rock fracture pattern is governed by the rock structure and the stress environment. The mudstone of Shaximiao formation presents a single shear section failure, and the fracture is gentle, while the fractures of the mudstones of Tongzhuyuan formation and Longmaxi formation transit from a single shear cross section to the conjugate shear with increasing the confining pressure. The fracture of Tongzhuyuan formation mudstone is smooth, but the fracture of Longmaxi formation mudstone is jagged.

Key words: mudstone, geological era, unloading, lateral expansion coefficient, lateral rupture coefficient, fracture mode

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45

[1] 徐日庆, 程康, 应宏伟, 林存刚, 梁荣柱, 冯苏阳, . 考虑埋深与剪切效应的基坑卸荷下卧 隧道的形变响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[2] 卞康, 陈彦安, 刘建, 崔德山, 李一冉, 梁文迪, 韩啸. 不同吸水时间下页岩卸荷破坏特征的 颗粒离散元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 355-367.
[3] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[4] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[5] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[6] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[7] 赵军, 郭广涛, 徐鼎平, 黄翔, 胡偲, 夏跃林, 张頔. 三轴及循环加卸载应力路径下深埋 硬岩变形破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1521-1530.
[8] 师旭超, 孙运德. 线性卸荷作用下软土超孔隙水压力 变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1333-1338.
[9] 任青阳, 张黄梅, 刘佳申, . 两种卸荷路径下泥岩流变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 127-134.
[10] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[11] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[12] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 张广东, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, . 不同卸荷速率下矩形巷道变形及 声发射特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3309-3318.
[13] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[14] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[15] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!