›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 893-901.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.03.035

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

模拟月壤抗剪强度试验研究及离散元分析

林呈祥1, 2,凌道盛1, 2,钟世英1, 2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310058
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-10 出版日期:2017-03-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 凌道盛,男,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事土动力学、计算土力学等方面的研究工作。E-mail: dsling@zju.edu.cn E-mail:tonylin1988@163.com
  • 作者简介:林呈祥,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事模拟月壤试验及离散元数值分析等方面的研究工作。

Experimental research and discrete element analysis of shear strength of lunar soil simulants

LIN Cheng-xiang1, 2, LING Dao-sheng1, 2, ZHONG Shi-ying1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geo-environmental Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China
  • Received:2015-04-10 Online:2017-03-11 Published:2018-06-05

摘要: 模拟月壤作为探月工程模型试验的基床材料,其力学特性将直接影响到月球探测器、着陆器等机构的设计,而抗剪强度是其主要力学特性之一。针对软着陆模型试验所用的TJ-1模拟月壤,采用标准应力路径三轴仪对其进行静三轴试验,得到了不同相对密度、剪切速率和围压条件下模拟月壤的应力-应变关系曲线、弹性模量和抗剪强度指标值等,试验结果表明:模拟月壤具有应变软化特征并存在一定大小的表观黏聚力,峰值内摩擦角的值介于43°~51°之间;相对密度越大,应变软化特征越明显,黏聚力和内摩擦角的值都越大;在密实状态时,剪切速率越大,模拟月壤的抗剪强度指标值呈整体下降的趋势。利用PFC3D软件建立三轴试验数值模型,研究了颗粒间摩擦系数、初始孔隙率以及颗粒刚度这3个细观参数对模拟月壤抗剪强度的影响,模拟结果表明:颗粒间摩擦系数是影响抗剪强度指标内摩擦角的主要因素,而初始孔隙率及颗粒刚度的影响则相对不明显;在一定数值范围内,颗粒间摩擦系数越大,内摩擦角的值越大,两者近似呈线性关系。

关键词: 模拟月壤, 抗剪强度, 应力-应变关系, 离散元分析

Abstract: The mechanical properties of lunar soil simulant which is used as the bed material of the model test for the lunar exploration, directly affect the design of structures like lunar probe and lander, and the shear strength is one of the main mechanical properties. To determine the mechanical properties of TJ-1 lunar soil simulant used in soft-landing model tests, a series of triaxial tests with triaxial apparatus under standard stress path is carried out to obtain its stress-strain relationship curves for different relative densities, shear rates and confining pressures. The result shows that, TJ-1 lunar soil simulant possesses the characteristics of strain softening and an apparent cohesive force of certain values, the peak inner frictional angle lies in the range of 43°-51°. With the increase of relative density of lunar soil simulant, the characteristics of strain softening grows more obvious and the values of cohesive force and angle of internal friction become greater; meanwhile, the values of shear strength indices decrease generally when the loading rates becomes faster. A numerical model of triaxial test using PFC3D is established to study the effect of meso parameters, such as inter-particle frictional coefficient, initial porosity and particle stiffness on the shear strength indices of lunar soil simulant. The simulation turns out that the inter-particle frictional coefficient is the primary factor affecting the angle of internal friction, while the other two have less effect. Within a certain limit value, the inter-particle frictional coefficient increases approximately linearly with the angle of internal friction.

Key words: lunar soil simulant, shear strength, stress-strain relationship, discrete element analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 47

[1] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[2] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[3] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[4] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[5] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[6] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[7] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[8] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[9] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[10] 郑耀林, 章荣军, 郑俊杰, 董超强, 陆展, . 絮凝-固化联合处理超高含水率 吹填淤泥浆的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3107-3114.
[11] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[12] 洪本根, 罗嗣海, 胡世丽, 王观石, 姚康, . 基质吸力对非饱和离子型稀土抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2303-2310.
[13] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[14] 李修磊, 李金凤, 施建勇, . 考虑纤维加筋作用的城市生活 垃圾土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1916-1924.
[15] 付宏渊, 刘 杰, 曾 铃, 卞汉兵, 史振宁, . 考虑荷载与浸水条件的预崩解炭质泥岩 变形与强度试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1273-1280.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!