›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 1133-1140.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.04.026

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多线叠交盾构隧道近距离穿越施工扰动机制研究

张晓清1,张孟喜1,李 林2,李武祥3,王有成1   

  1. 1. 上海大学 土木工程系,上海 200072;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 中铁二十局集团有限公司,广东 广州 511400
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-27 出版日期:2017-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 张孟喜,男,1963年生,博士后,教授,主要从事岩土工程及地下结构方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: mxzhang@i.shu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangxiaoqing582@163.com
  • 作者简介:张晓清,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41172238);中铁二十局集团有限公司技术开发课题。

Mechanism of approaching construction disturbance caused by multi-line overlapped shield tunnelling

ZHANG Xiao-qing1, ZHANG Meng-xi1, LI Lin2, LI Wu-xiang3, WANG You-cheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. China Railway 20 Bureau Group Corporation, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511400, China
  • Received:2015-05-27 Online:2017-04-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41172238) and the Project Technology Development of China Railway 20 Bureau Group Corporation.

摘要: 多线叠交盾构隧道在地下空间内布置形式繁多,土体-隧道间相互作用机制复杂。针对多线叠交盾构垂直上穿、垂直下穿和上、下夹穿3种典型穿越施工形式,根据盾构隧道近距离施工的技术特点和控制要求,采用排液法重点分析了施工中因地层损失和开挖卸荷引起的地表沉降以及既有隧道纵向变形规律,并通过构建三维弹塑性有限元动态模型,与部分试验结果进行了对比验证。研究结果表明:上穿施工中,地表沉降较大,既有隧道均呈现上浮趋势;下穿施工时,地表沉降较小,既有隧道均呈现下沉趋势;先下后上穿越施工在各阶段引起的地表沉降变化均匀,最终地表沉降量相对较小;先上后下穿越施工时既有隧道变形曲线曲率大,既有隧道变形呈现反复震荡变化。成果可为类似多线叠交隧道工程的施工提供理论指导。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 多线叠交, 模型试验, 数值模拟, 岩体变形

Abstract: Multi-line overlapping shield tunnel has a complex form in underground space layout. The interaction mechanism between tunnels and soil is very complex. The new tunnel caused ground settlement and made adverse effects when traversing the existing tunnels. The drainage method model test was applied according to the technical requirements of shield tunneling and control requirements of approaching construction. The ground surface subsidence and the existing tunnels longitudinal deformation caused by strata damage and excavation unloading are analyzed for three typical construction methods, above-crossing, under-crossing and above-under crossing. Finite element model was built to simulate the dynamic construction process of model test. The results show that ground settlement turns to be larger, and the existing tunnels have an upward moving during the construction of up-crossing. While under-crossed, a smaller settlement with a tendency of subsidence is found in the existing tunnel. The under-crossing first and then above-crossing construction leads to a uniform variation in ground settlement during various construction stages, and the final settlement is relatively small. The above-crossing first and then under-crossing construction results in a great curvature in deformation curve of existing tunnel, and the deformation of existing tunnel fluctuates constantly. The research results can provide some theoretical basis and prophase guidance for similar projects in the future.

Key words: shield tunneling, multi-line overlapped, model test, numerical simulation, geotechnical deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 杨钊, 乔春生, 陈松. 基于蒙特卡罗法的岩体变形模量统计 特征及参数权重分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 271-278.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[6] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[7] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[8] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[9] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[10] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[11] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[12] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[13] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[14] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[15] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!