›› 1985, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 37-49.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粘土固结参数变化的分析

李作勤; 陈大珉; 闻新芳;   

  • 出版日期:1985-10-21 发布日期:2017-04-10

Analysis of Varation of Clay Consolidation Parameters

Li Zuoqin; Ghen Damin; Wen Xinfang   

  • Online:1985-10-21 Published:2017-04-10

摘要: 本文依据土力学中已建立的基本概念,通过试验研究,首先找出正常固结粘土的渗透系数K与孔隙比e的关系,压缩系数a_V与孔隙比e或有效固结压力σ′的关系,从而推导出固结系数C_V与孔隙比或有效固结压力的关系表达式。分析不同土类固结系数的变化,归纳出三种典型的情况,即:C_V随e的减小而减小;C_V随e的减小而增大和C_V基本上与e无关。并指出特殊土类的C_V有特殊的变化规律。其次,分析了固结指数m变化的物理依据,讨论了m值与有效固结压力和上层厚度H的关系,最后,说明C_V和m变化的相互关系以及实用计算中应注意的问题。

关键词: 固结压力, 关系表达式, 正常固结, 固结度, 固结指数, 次时间效应, 土类, 物理依据, 土力学, 重塑土样,

Abstract: Based on the fundamental conception soil mechanics, by experimental research, the relation of the coefficient of permeability K to the void ratio e and that of the coefficient of compression aγ to the effective consolidation pressureσ’ are first expressed for normally consolidation clays. Hences the expression of relation of the consolidation coefficient cν to the void ratio e or the effective consolidation pressures is given. There are three typical cases of variation of the consolidation coefficient for different soils types, i.e. the value Cν decreases with the void ratio’s decrease; the value Cν increases with the void ratio’s decrease and the value Cν is essentially independent of the void ratio. Specific variation of the value Cν for specifically soil type is pointed out. The physical foundation for the variation of consolidation index m is explained. The relationships between the value m, the effective consolidation pressure σ’ and the soil layer thickness H are discussed. Finally, correlation between the value Cν and m’s variation as well as the noteworthy problems in practice are represented.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 勇. 滑坡面下双排抗滑结构的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2971 -2977 .
[2] 李鸿博,郭小红. 公路连拱隧道土压力荷载的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3429 -3434 .
[3] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[4] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[5] 郭保华. 单孔岩样水压致裂的数值分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1965 -1970 .
[6] 孙 强. “对‘两种应变软化介质组成的边坡失稳研究’的讨论”的回复[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2351 -2352 .
[7] 王生新,陆勇翔,尹亚雄,郭定一. 碎石土湿陷性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2373 -2377 .
[8] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[9] 孟庆山,孔令伟,陈能远,范建海,郭 刚. 桩锚挡墙联合支护残积土边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3379 -3384 .
[10] 刘维正,石名磊,缪林昌. 基于扰动状态概念的结构性土压缩特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3475 -3480 .