›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 1258-1266.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.05.004

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

花岗岩巷道岩爆声发射信号主频特性试验研究

张艳博1, 2,于光远1, 2,田宝柱1, 2,刘祥鑫1, 2,梁 鹏1, 2,王亚东1, 2   

  1. 1. 华北理工大学 矿业工程学院,河北 唐山 063009; 2. 华北理工大学 河北省矿业开发与安全技术重点试验室,河北 唐山 063009
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-15 出版日期:2017-05-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:张艳博,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事采矿工程与岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51374088,No. 51574102);河北省自然科学基金(No. E2017209241)。

Experimental study of acoustic emission signal dominant-frequency characteristics of rockburst in a granite tunnel

ZHANG Yan-bo1, 2, YU Guang-yuan1, 2, TIAN Bao-zhu1, 2, LIU Xiang-xin1, 2, LIANG Peng1, 2, WANG Ya-dong1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Mining Engineering, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063009, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mining and Safety Technology of Hebei Province, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei 063009, China
  • Received:2015-06-15 Online:2017-05-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China (51374088, 51174071) and the Hebei Province Natural Science Fund (E2017209241).

摘要: 利用双轴伺服试验机开展花岗岩巷道岩爆模拟试验,采用声发射系统获取岩爆全过程的波形信号。基于频谱分析理论,研究岩爆孕育、发生全过程的声发射信号主频特性。研究结果表明:双轴加载条件下花岗岩巷道岩爆声发射主频分布区间为0.4~110 kHz,其中99%以上的主频值集中在35~65 kHz。声发射信号主频的分布随岩爆演化可分为3个阶段:(1)岩爆孕育前期,大部分主频值集中在35~65 kHz和15~25 kHz区间,且有一定数量接近0.4 kHz的低频值出现,极少出现接近110 kHz的高频值;(2)岩爆孕育中期,主频值集中在35~65 kHz区间,接近0.4 kHz的低频值基本消失,少量接近110 kHz的高频值开始出现;(3)岩爆发生阶段,35~65 kHz区间内的主频数量骤减,接近0.4 kHz的低频值极少出现,接近110 kHz的高频值密集出现。研究结果为优选声发射监测频段提供了方法和依据,且对巷道岩爆的监测预警工作具有重要理论意义。

关键词: 花岗岩, 巷道岩爆, 声发射, 主频

Abstract: A biaxial servo testing machine is used to simulate rockburst of a granite tunnel, and the acoustic emission (AE) system is applied to acquire the waveform signal. The dominant-frequency characteristics of AE signals from initiation to occurrence of rockburst are analyzed using the spectrum analysis theory. The results show that the dominant frequency interval of AE signal is from 0.4 to 110 kHz, and more than 99% of the dominant-frequency concentration is in the range of 35-65 kHz. The distribution of the dominant-frequency of the AE signal can be divided into three stages with the evolution of rockburst. In the early stage of rockburst initiation, the dominant frequency is in the range of 35-65 kHz and 15-25 kHz, a few of low frequency AE signal close to 0.4 kHz occurs, and high frequency around 110 kHz seldom appear. In the middle period of rockburst initiation, the low frequency around 0.4 kHz nearly disappears, but the high frequency around 110 kHz begins to appear. In the final stage of rockburst occurrence, the number of dominant-frequency in the range of 35-65 kHz plummets, the low frequency approximate to 0.4 kHz almost disappears, but the high frequency close to 110 kHz appears intensively. The study provides the fundamental understanding of optimizing the frequency band of AE monitoring, which has important theoretical significance with respect to monitoring and early warning of tunnel rockburst.

Key words: granite, tunnel rockburst, acoustic emission, dominant-frequency

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 王创业, 常新科, 刘沂琳, 郭文彬, . 单轴压缩条件下大理岩破裂过程声发射频谱 演化特征实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 51-62.
[2] 郤保平, 吴阳春, 王帅, 熊贵明, 赵阳升, . 热冲击作用下花岗岩力学特性及其随冷却温度 演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 83-94.
[3] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[4] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[5] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[6] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[7] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[8] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[9] 张艳博, 孙林, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 刘祥鑫, . 花岗岩破裂过程声发射关键信号时 频特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 157-165.
[10] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[11] 张国凯, 李海波, 王明洋, 李晓锋, . 基于声学测试和摄像技术的单裂隙岩石 裂纹扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 63-72.
[12] 楼烨, 张广清. 压裂液黏度对循环水力压裂影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 109-118.
[13] 刘希灵, 刘周, 李夕兵, 韩梦思. 单轴压缩与劈裂荷载下灰岩声发射b值特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 267-274.
[14] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[15] 杨道学, 赵奎, 曾鹏, 卓毓龙, . 基于粒子群优化算法的未知波速声发射 定位数值模[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 494-502.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!