岩土力学 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1565-1572.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.004

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

堆石料应力-应变特性大型三轴试验研究

徐志华1, 2, 3, 4,孙大伟4,张国栋1, 2, 3, 4   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡地区地质灾害与生态环境湖北省协同创新中心,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 湖北长江三峡滑坡国家野外科学观测研究站,湖北 宜昌 443002;3. 湖北省地质灾害防治工程技术研究中心,湖北 宜昌 443002;4. 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点试验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-18 出版日期:2017-06-12 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:徐志华,男,1987年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体力学特性试验、数值模拟及本构模型研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51179097);湖北省自然科学基金创新群体(No.2012FFA040);湖北省科技支撑计划(No.2013BEC005,No.2015BCE038)。

Study on stress-strain behavior of rockfill using large-scale triaxial tests

XU Zhi-hua1, 2, 3, 4, SUN Da-wei4, ZHANG Guo-dong1, 2, 3, 4   

  1. 1. China Three Gorges University,Collaborative Innovation Center for Geo-Hazards and Eco-Environment in Three Gorges Area, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. National Field Observation and Research Station of Landsides in Three Gorges of Yangtze River, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. Hubei Engineering Research Center of Geological Hazards Prevention, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 4. China Three Gorges University Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2015-09-18 Online:2017-06-12 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51179097); Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation innovation group (2012FFA040) and Hubei Province science and technology support program (2013BEC005, 2015BCE038).

摘要: 通过对水布垭筑坝堆石料进行0.2~3.5 MPa围压下的大型三轴固结排水剪(CD)试验,分析了不同围压下堆石料的偏应力-轴应变关系及体应变-轴应变关系的变化规律;引入破坏强度和体变与围压的关系,采用临界偏应力 和临界体应变 作为归一化因子对不同围压下的应力-应变关系试验结果进行归一化处理,建立了不同围压下的应力-应变关系表达式,并将计算预测与试验结果进行对比验证。研究表明:对于颗粒级配确定的密实堆石料,初始变形期存在一定的弹性增长阶段,且该直线段的斜率受围压的影响较大;低围压时表现为应变软化,先剪缩后剪胀为主的力学特性,且围压越低,剪胀效应越明显;高围压(0.8 MPa≤ ≤3.0 MPa)时表现为应变硬化、剪缩为主的特性;剪胀消失的临界围压处于0.45~0.8 MPa之间;超高围压( >3.0 MPa)条件下,虽表现为应变软化、剪缩的特性,但其应变软化的机制与低围压下不同;分析认为,超高围压下剪切过程中颗粒的相对破碎率达15%以上,颗粒破碎引起的堆石料强度降低大于围压的增大对堆石料强度的提高。峰值主应力比随围压的增大而降低,且随轴应变的增大而趋于一致。堆石料的破坏强度与围压呈线性相关。最后,通过计算预测结果证明了该应力-应变关系表达式的正确性。

关键词: 堆石料, 超高围压, 大变形, 大型三轴试验, 应力-应变

Abstract: In this study, large-scale triaxial consolidation drained (CD) shear tests under 0.2-3.5 MPa confining pressure for the rockfill of Shuibuya Dam were performed to investigate the stress-strain behaviors of rockfill, i.e., deviatoric stress-axial strain relationship and volume strain-axial strain relationship. Stress-strain relationships under different confining pressure conditions are determined using relationships of failure strength and volume strain to confining pressure. Critical deviatoric stress and critical deviatoric strain normalize the stress-strain relationships of experimental results and verifies the proposed equation. The experimental results show that, for the dense rockfill, a certain elastic stage occurs in the initial deformation, and its slope is strongly dependent on confining pressure. More strain softening is observed under low the confining pressure. The rockfill presents strain hardening and shear contraction within 0.8≤ ≤3.0 MPa of confining pressure. Dilatancy behavior occurs depends on the critical confining pressure (between 0.45 and 0.8 MPa). The deformation of rockfill under >3.0 MPa presents strain softening and shear contraction. Analysis show that the rockfill strength decrement caused by particle breakage is greater than the increase caused by confining pressure increment. The relative breakage rate is above 15%. Peak principal stress ratio is reduced as the confining pressure increases, consistent with the increase of axial strain. The fracture strength is observed linear with confining pressure. Predictions by proposed equation show that the formula given in this paper is correct.

Key words: rockfill material, super-high confining pressure, large strain, large-scale triaxial test, stress-strain

中图分类号: 

  • TU 453
[1] 侯志强, 王宇, 刘冬桥, 李长洪, 刘昊. 三轴疲劳-卸围压条件下大理岩力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1510-1520.
[2] 雷升祥, 赵伟. 软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1039-1047.
[3] 雷江, 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 于洪丹, 马永尚, 谢华东, 王富刚, . 引红济石引水隧洞围岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3435-3446.
[4] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[5] 丁艳辉, 张丙印, 钱晓翔, 殷 殷, 孙 逊. 堆石料湿化变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2975-2981.
[6] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[7] 张凌凯, 王睿, 张建民, 唐新军, . 考虑颗粒破碎效应的堆石料静动力本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2547-2554.
[8] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 多孔隙岩石加卸载力学特性及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2673-2685.
[9] 孔宪京, 宁凡伟, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 周晨光, . 应力路径和干湿状态对堆石料颗粒破碎的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[10] 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周 洋, 闫 婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[11] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[12] 李修磊, 李金凤, 施建勇, . 考虑纤维加筋作用的城市生活 垃圾土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1916-1924.
[13] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[14] 王娟娟, 郝延周, 王铁行. 非饱和压实黄土结构特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1351-1357.
[15] 王 涛, 刘斯宏, 郑守仁, 鲁 洋, . 掺复合浆液堆石料压缩特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1420-1426.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!