›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1629-1638.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.011

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单轴压缩下层状含水页岩损伤破坏过程及特征

腾俊洋1, 2,唐建新1, 2,张宇宁1, 2,段金成1, 2,王进博1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点试验室,重庆 400044;2. 重庆大学 资源及环境科学学院,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-11 出版日期:2017-06-12 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 唐建新,男,1959年生,博士,教授,主要从事矿山压力及地下工程围岩稳定性的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jtxtang@cqu.edu.cn E-mail: jteng89@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:腾俊洋,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道及地下工程围岩稳定性研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点试验室自主课题重点项目(No.2011DA105287-ZD201504)。

Damage process and characteristics of layered water-bearing shale under uniaxial compression

TENG Jun-yang1, 2, TANG Jian-xin1, 2, ZHANG Yu-ning1, 2, DUAN Jin-cheng1, 2, WANG Jin-bo1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2016-09-11 Online:2017-06-12 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by Key Project of Independent Subjects of National Key Laboratory: Control and Dynamics of Coal Mine (2011DA105287- ZD201504).

摘要: 页岩在重庆地区分布较广,在隧址围岩赋存环境中占较大比重,考虑到层理和水对页岩性质影响显著,因此,对页岩在层理和含水率影响下损伤破坏过程和劣化机制进行研究。试验借助于MTS815岩石力学测试系统和PAC声发射仪,进行单轴压缩条件下层状页岩损伤破坏过程的声发射试验研究,并采用大型离散元软件3DEC对页岩破坏模式进行对比分析。研究结果表明:(1)页岩的矿物成分、矿物排列和加载方向决定其损伤破坏过程,原生微裂隙的分布、矿物晶粒大小和加载方向决定了宏观裂隙的分布,宏观裂隙则控制着页岩的破坏模式。(2)页岩内部沿层理方向原生微裂隙群是页岩破坏起裂部位,次生微裂隙常沿矿物边界发展,与加载方向基本一致,最终形成宏观裂隙,起到连通层理破裂面的作用。(3)层状页岩AE事件的生成和分布与试件内部的微裂隙分布关系密切,初始压密阶段积聚于试件中部层理附近,后沿层理法向方向向端部或两侧发展,最终沿宏观裂隙转折及交点处聚结成核。(4)层理和水对页岩的损伤劣化机制不同,层理对页岩的损伤作用本质上是沿层理分布的原生微裂隙群的损伤作用,而水对页岩的损伤作用主要是水的吸附和毛细管压力作用。

关键词: 层状页岩, 含水率, 3DEC, 声发射, 损伤

Abstract: Shale widely distributed in Chongqing Region particularly accounts for a relatively large proportion in the surrounding tunnel of rock mass. The stratification and water significantly affect mechanical properties of shale, this study is to investigate the damage process of shale and its deterioration mechanism under the influence of stratification and water content using the MTS815 testing system and PAC acoustic emission (AE) instrument. AE experiments were performed in the damage process of layered shale under uniaxial compression. The damage mode of shale was further analyzed comparatively using the commercial software 3DEC. The damage process of shale was determined by its mineral component, mineral arrangement and loading direction. The distribution of macro-cracks was dominated by the distribution of pre-existing micro-crack, the size of mineral grain and loading direction. Moreover, the macro-cracks governed the damage mode of shale. The pre-existing micro-fissuring group towards the stratification direction inside the shale triggered the damage zones of shale. The secondary micro-cracks were generally found along the mineral boundary, which basically had the same direction as the loading direction. These micro-cracks were formed the macro-cracks, which connected the damaging surfaces of stratifications. The AE events of generation and distribution of layered shale were closely related to the distribution of micro-cracks inside the trial piece. The initial compression phase accumulated near the stratification in the central section of shale, then developed towards its ends or both sides along the normal direction of the stratification. It finally coalesced to the core along the turning point and intersection position of macro-cracks. The stratification and water had different damage and deterioration mechanism on shale. The effect of stratification on shale was essentially the damage effect of pre-existing micro-cracks group distributed along the stratification. However, the damage effect of water on shale is primarily depending on the water absorption and capillary pressure.

Key words: layered shale, water content, 3DEC, acoustic emission, damage

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 王创业, 常新科, 刘沂琳, 郭文彬, . 单轴压缩条件下大理岩破裂过程声发射频谱 演化特征实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 51-62.
[2] 张艳博, 吴文瑞, 姚旭龙, 梁鹏, 田宝柱, 黄艳利, 梁精龙, . 单轴压缩下花岗岩声发射、红外特征及 损伤演化试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 139-146.
[3] 张晓君, 李晓程, 刘国磊, 李宝玉, . 卸压孔劈裂局部解危效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 171-178.
[4] 叶阳, 曾亚武, 杜欣, 孙翰卿, 陈曦, . 球形砾石碰撞损伤破碎三维离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 368-378.
[5] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[6] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[7] 杨凯旋, 侯天顺. 击实试验类型对EPS颗粒轻量土击实特性的 影响规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1971-1982.
[8] 杜宇翔, 盛谦, 王帅, 付晓东, 罗红星, 田明, 王立纬, 梅鸿儒. 昔格达组半成岩微观结构与力学性质研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1247-1258.
[9] 杨艳霜, 周辉, 梅松华, 张占荣, 李金兰. 高地应力硬脆性围岩开挖损伤区时效性扩展案例分析——特征与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1357-1365.
[10] 王青元, 刘杰, 王培涛, 刘飞, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[11] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[12] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
[13] 陈卫忠, 李翻翻, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 热−水−力耦合条件下黏土岩蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 379-388.
[14] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[15] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!