›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1666-1674.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.015

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

开挖条件下非均质地基中单桩竖向承载特性非线性分析

纠永志1, 2, 3,祝彦知1   

  1. 1. 中原工学院建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450007;2. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092; 3. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-02 出版日期:2017-06-12 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:纠永志,男,1982年生,讲师,从事岩土工程方面的科研和教学工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51608548);河南省科技攻关项目(No.082102360056);郑州市科技攻关计划项目(No.10PTGG382-2)。

Nonlinear analysis for bearing characteristics of vertically loaded single pile in non-homogeneous soil under excavation

JIU Yong-zhi1, 2, 3, ZHU Yan-zhi1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministy of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2015-11-02 Online:2017-06-12 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51608548), the Science and Technology Project of Henan Province (082102360056) and the Science and Technology Project of Zhengzhou City (10PTGG382-2).

摘要: 在考虑开挖引起土体回弹和土体强度特性、应力状态变化的基础上,提出了开挖条件下非均质地基中竖向受荷单桩非线性计算方法,并与已有试验结果对比,证明了简化方法的正确性,并对开挖前、后单桩的竖向承载特性的变化以及开挖后土体回弹对基桩受力和变形的影响进行研究分析。研究表明,常规试桩法和套管试桩法高估了基桩竖向极限承载力和桩顶刚度,采用常规试桩和套管试桩法得到的承载力作为设计值偏于不安全;开挖卸荷引起桩周土体回弹使得桩身出现拉力,开挖深度较大时桩身中、下部的配筋应充分考虑由于开挖引起的沿桩身的拉力,防止开挖过程中基桩被拉断;桩周土体的卸荷回弹将会引起桩顶刚度的明显降低。

关键词: 开挖, 极限承载力, 土体卸荷回弹, 桩顶刚度, 超固结

Abstract: In this study, a simplified nonlinear calculation method was developed to analyze the single pile in non-homogeneous soil under excavation, considering the unloading rebound of soil and changes of soil property caused by excavation. The calculated results show good agreement with testing results obtained by the present method, which indicates that the validity of this method is verified. Moreover, we studied the responses of the single pile after excavation under vertical load using the simplified method. It is found that the ultimate vertical bearing capacity and vertical stiffness of the pile loaded after excavation are overestimated by both the conventional loading test method and loading test with the sleeve method, which could lead to an unsafe design. In addition, excavation causes rebound of soils around the pile and then results in tension force in the pile. To avoid the pile be pulled apart, the reinforcing bars in the middle-lower part of the pile should be raised when the excavation depth is deep. The unloading rebound of soil around caused a great decrease in stiffness of the pile top.

Key words: excavation, ultimate bearing capacity, soil unloading rebound, pile top rigidity, over-consolidation ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[3] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[4] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, 谢鑫, . 不同荷载下矩形巷道围岩变形及声发射 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1818-1828.
[5] 王洪新, 沈旭凯. 考虑支撑作用的基坑抗隆起稳定安全系数计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1680-1689.
[6] 杨艳霜, 周辉, 梅松华, 张占荣, 李金兰. 高地应力硬脆性围岩开挖损伤区时效性扩展案例分析——特征与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1357-1365.
[7] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[8] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[9] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[10] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[11] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[12] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
[13] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[14] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[15] 柯锦福, 王水林, 郑宏, 杨永涛, . 基于修正对称和反对称分解的 三维数值流形元法应用推广[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 695-706.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!