›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1762-1770.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.026

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于单元状态指标的盾构隧道水-力耦合模拟分析

马春景1, 2,姜谙男1, 2,江宗斌1, 2,王善勇3   

  1. 1. 大连海事大学 道路与桥梁工程研究所,辽宁 大连 116026;2. 大连海事大学 辽宁省公路工程重点实验室,辽宁 大连 116026; 3. 澳大利亚纽卡斯尔大学 土木系,卡拉汉,新南威尔士 2308,澳大利亚
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-31 出版日期:2017-06-12 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 姜谙男,男,1971年生,教授,博士生导师,从事岩土工程稳定性分析和多场耦合方面的研究工作。E-mail: jiangannan@163.com E-mail:machunjinglw@163.com
  • 作者简介:马春景,男,1990年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石多场耦合机理及数值模拟方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.51678101);中央高校基本科研业务费(No.3132014326)

Hydro-mechanical coupled simulation and analysis of shield tunnel construction based on the zone state index

MA Chun-jing1, 2, JIANG An-nan1, 2, JIANG Zong-bin1, 2, WANG Shan-yong3   

  1. 1. Institute of Road and Bridge Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning 116026, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Highway Engineering of Liaoning Province, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning 116026, China 3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
  • Received:2015-08-31 Online:2017-06-12 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (51678101) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3132014326).

摘要: 针对富水区土压平衡式盾构隧道施工进行了水-力耦合(H-M耦合)数值模拟。首先在既有的研究成果基础上建立了单元状态指标ZSI(Zone State Index),该指标将屈服、破坏接近度等进行适当变换,统一到单元安全度量体系(负值代表破坏),实现了单元的弹性、屈服和破坏3种状态的完整表达。然后将应变-渗透系数方程与ZSI结合,使渗透系数在耦合的过程中随单元状态发生改变,弥补了FLAC3D渗流模拟中渗透系数不变的不足。最后采用FLAC3D的FISH语言二次开发,以大连地铁202标段香工街站-沙河口火车站区间盾构地铁隧道为例,实现H-M耦合过程的模拟。分析了隧道掘进的过程中开挖面及围岩的变形和破坏特征,根据开挖面上ZSI的计算结果对开挖面进行了稳定性评价。研究结果表明,该方法可以较好地进行H-M耦合过程中模拟和分析,与实测结果较为吻合。

关键词: H-M耦合, 盾构隧道, 开挖面, 单元状态指标, FLAC3D

Abstract: The hydro-mechanical (H-M) coupled numerical simulation was conducted for the prediction of the tunneling construction in water-rich areas using the earth pressure balance (EPB) shield. First, a zone state index (ZSI) was established based on the achievements of other scholars. Then, the yield approach index and failure approach index was unified to safety evaluation system (negative values mean failure), which achieved a complete expression of elastic, yield and failure states. By combining the strain-permeability equation with ZSI, the variable of permeability coefficient was calculated during the coupled process, which made up for the deficiency of permeability coefficient in FLAC3D seepage simulation. Taken the 202 section of Dalian Metro, Xianggong street station to Shahekou railway station, as an example, the H-M coupled numerical simulation was realized by using program in FISH language. The deformation and failure characteristics of excavation face and surrounding rock during tunnel excavation were analyzed. The stability of excavation face was further evaluated according to numerical results of ZSI. The results indicate that the proposed method can be used to well simulate and analyze the H-M coupling process, which are in good agreement with measured results.

Key words: hydro-mechanical coupling, shield tunnel, excavation face, zone state index, FLAC3D

中图分类号: 

  • TU 94+1

[1] 毛家骅, 袁大军, 杨将晓, 张兵, . 砂土地层泥水盾构开挖面孔隙变化特征理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2283-2292.
[2] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[3] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[4] 杨振兴, 陈健, 孙振川, 游永锋, 周建军, 吕乾乾, . 泥水平衡盾构用海水泥浆的改性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 501-508.
[5] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[6] 章定文, 刘志祥, 沈国根, 鄂俊宇, . 超大直径浅埋盾构隧道土压力实测分析 及其计算方法适用性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 91-98.
[7] 张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层 变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[8] 杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧 道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[9] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[10] 黄大维, 周顺华, 冯青松, 罗锟, 雷晓燕, 许有俊, . 地表均布超载作用下盾构隧道上覆土层 竖向土压力转移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2213-2220.
[11] 莫振泽, 王梦恕, 李海波, 钱勇进, 罗跟东, 王辉, . 粉砂地层中浓泥土压盾构泥膜效应引起的 孔压变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2257-2263.
[12] 邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[13] 杨秀荣,姜谙男,江宗斌. 含水状态下软岩蠕变试验及损伤模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 167-174.
[14] 刘 建,赵国彦,梁伟章,吴 浩,彭府华,. 非均匀岩石介质单轴压缩强度及变形破裂规律的数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 505-512.
[15] 程红战,陈 健,胡之锋,黄珏皓, . 考虑砂土抗剪强度空间变异性的盾构开挖面稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3047-3054.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!